Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Five Hundred posts on the topic and in not one of them has Cum Slinger managed to post the part of the federal law which allegedly dictates that schools patrol homemade lunches and force kids to take school lunches.
Hey Cum Slinger have you noticed that not ONE person has came to your aid in this thread? Not one, That would suggest to a mentally stable person that maybe just maybe their position is untenable.
Long story short, you're an idiot and no one wants anything to do with you or your stupid opinion.
Yep..It's degenerated into a somewhat sexual display of liberal civility so is not a thread anymore. But birds do it better'n bears.
Your constant barrage of insults serve to do nothing but reflect back on you. I don't need the friend of a liberal to take my part in this thread.. if he wants to sell out, that;s his fucking problem, not mine.. Also, I'm not the only conservative.. guess again.
Is this the same article you posted that debunked those other stories?
Michelle Obama has champoined child obesity from the beginning of her role as First Lady. It seems I remember her promoting this particular program. If a public school employee checks a lunch on behalf of the program, they function as a de facto federal official. So did this happen? Is that the reason NY dropped the program? Seems like if the answers are both yes, there is no real argument left.
Michelle Obama has champoined child obesity from the beginning of her role as First Lady. It seems I remember her promoting this particular program. If a public school employee checks a lunch on behalf of the program, they function as a de facto federal official. So did this happen? Is that the reason NY dropped the program? Seems like if the answers are both yes, there is no real argument left.
NO ONE is checking lunches on behalf of the program.
Here's an analogy.
Let's say you are hiding something illegal in your closet and your girlfriend gets mad at you and takes it and gives it to the cops telling them where she found
That is NOT her acting as an agent of the police because they didn't ask her to look for illegal things.
If on the other hand , a police officer asked her to look through your shit for anything illegal, that is an ILLEGAL search becuase she is acting as an agent of the police.
The program here has NOT asked anyone to search home packed lunches. How much of a simpleton are some of you morons?
It's amazing just how far the Obama Presidency has used the force of the Federal Government to enslave Americans. He wasn't lying, "FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE."
What we are talking about here are free lunches given to illegal aliens, for the most part. Any child is free to take a lunch from home and eat what they please, we are only talking about the free lunch from the cafeteria. So honestly, I have to say at the point that one is accepting free lunch from the government, the government does have a right to say what is in that lunch,
No we're not.. IT'S ALL FREE and REDUCED lunches, PERIOD.. WTF?
Really?? SO when my date takes me out and pays for my dinner I forfeit the right to order what I like????It's amazing just how far the Obama Presidency has used the force of the Federal Government to enslave Americans. He wasn't lying, "FUNDAMENTAL CHANGE."
What we are talking about here are free lunches given to illegal aliens, for the most part. Any child is free to take a lunch from home and eat what they please, we are only talking about the free lunch from the cafeteria. So honestly, I have to say at the point that one is accepting free lunch from the government, the government does have a right to say what is in that lunch,
No we're not.. IT'S ALL FREE and REDUCED lunches, PERIOD.. WTF?
If the lunch is paid for by others, then others decide what is in it. I can't figure out what is wrong with that?
If I buy tacos for the homeless as I drive through Del Taco, I decide what I will buy, not they.
NO ONE is checking lunches on behalf of the program.
Here's an analogy.
Let's say you are hiding something illegal in your closet and your girlfriend gets mad at you and takes it and gives it to the cops telling them where she found
That is NOT her acting as an agent of the police because they didn't ask her to look for illegal things.
If on the other hand , a police officer asked her to look through your shit for anything illegal, that is an ILLEGAL search becuase she is acting as an agent of the police.
The program here has NOT asked anyone to search home packed lunches. How much of a simpleton are some of you morons?
Breibart disagree's with you CONS who say it's only free lunches.. I guess Breibart lies.
On July 1, the standards got stricter for all participants in the National School Lunch Program that is shepherded out of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and has forced schools to limit calories, trans fats and sodium, while serving students a wider variety of fruit, vegetables and whole grains, and axe portion sizes. However, the lunch lady in chief's program's been working out so well that the only increase the feds have seen is a noticeable uptick in food thrown in the garbage.
Michelle Obama s Federal Forced Food Efforts Stir Controversy
The National School Lunch Program serves 30.5 million or over 60% children National School Lunch Act - Wikipedia the free encyclopediaBreibart disagree's with you CONS who say it's only free lunches.. I guess Breibart lies.
On July 1, the standards got stricter for all participants in the National School Lunch Program that is shepherded out of the U.S. Department of Agriculture and has forced schools to limit calories, trans fats and sodium, while serving students a wider variety of fruit, vegetables and whole grains, and axe portion sizes. However, the lunch lady in chief's program's been working out so well that the only increase the feds have seen is a noticeable uptick in food thrown in the garbage.
Michelle Obama s Federal Forced Food Efforts Stir Controversy
From your own article;
{NSLP provides per meal cash reimbursements to schools as an entitlement to provide nutritious meals to children. This means that all eligible schools can participate and all children attending those schools can participate. Schools participating in NSLP also receive agricultural commodities (unprocessed or partially processed foods) as a supplement to the per-meal cash reimbursements, in amounts based on the number of lunches they serve.}
It's welfare.
IF you want free food, then you get what is given.
What a flimsy argument some of you conservatives are coming up with in order to revert to type and align with leftists.. WTG
What a flimsy argument some of you conservatives are coming up with in order to revert to type and align with leftists.. WTG
some of foods were so bland, and they cut down on portions so the kids either weren't eating it and throwing it away or were still hunger for the rest of school. I was a baker, I baked the regular size cinnamon rolls for three years, 500 of them for the school. then when MaBella came involved they wanted to cut down the portions, so they ended up looking like little eyeballs and I had to make 1500 -1600 of those and it took me two days because I also had to make breakfast serve both breakfast and lunch, clean up, all in 5.75 hrs.
They made the kids go back into the lunch room,( I worked in a grade school kindergartner to 5th) and GET a fruit or vegetable if they didn't have it on their trays. Kids crying all over the lunch room and decided I wasn't going to be their food Nazi. so I quit.
Parents need to go see what they are doing to your children.
