Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
/——-/ You can indict a ham sandwich but not a Nothing Burger.Let the sky screaming commence
^^^^That was good...that was freaking great...^^^^/——-/ You can indict a ham sandwich but not a Nothing Burger
Mewler is just covering his ass....
Like I said, and NOW the fun begins as the IG and his prosecutor go to work-)
To the REAL Democrats, sorry.
To the far Leftists----------->this is going to be soooooooo good-)
According to the article, there has been some legal arguments about doing it differently, but that's really not up to lawyers to decide--it's up to the courts, and we'll be dead of old age before that gets changed.Not everyone knows thisWe already knew that, since 1973.
APRIL 5, 2018 WASHINGTON—One of the most fundamental questions facing Special Counsel Robert Mueller in his investigation of President Trump is what to do if he uncovers evidence of wrongdoing by Mr. Trump.
Since 1973, the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel has maintained a policy that a sitting president may not be prosecuted or indicted. That policy was first articulated during the Nixon administration’s Watergate scandal, and was reaffirmed in 2000 following the assorted scandals of the Clinton presidency.
The policy seeks to insulate the nation’s chief executive from prosecutorial pressures that would “impermissibly undermine the capacity of the executive branch to perform its constitutionally assigned functions,” according to the formal policy statement announced during the Clinton administration.
Now, 19 months into the Trump-Russia investigation, legal analysts are questioning whether Mr. Mueller should jettison the 45-year-old Justice Department policy, if necessary, to indict Trump.
Much of the recent debate is being driven by Trump critics who are fearful that if Mueller has no ability to prosecute the president, Trump will escape accountability. Others have held the same position on the thorny constitutional issue through decades of presidential scandals.
If Mueller finds evidence of wrongdoing, can he indict Trump?
A lot of people had high hopes...
Let the sky screaming commence
LMAO. As Donald said himself, Rudy is new on the job.
The noose is around Duh Donald's neck and I am lovin' that it gets tighter every fucking day.
Over 100 Charges, 19 People and 3 Companies: The Mueller Inquiry, Explained
If you've been watching Sunday morning talk shows for the last two weeks, Rudy's been right about everything.Has Giuliani been right about anything so far?
trumplings will clutch at any straw
No, there is a chance, if Dems take Congress in the elections, that justice could be served. They could possibly impeach and indict, if serious wrong doing was found. 2/3 though--that would be a mighty lot of Democrats, so it would have to be serious enough crimes that some Republicans would agree.Like I said, and NOW the fun begins as the IG and his prosecutor go to work-)
To the REAL Democrats, sorry.
To the far Leftists----------->this is going to be soooooooo good-)
Won’t happen. It sucks, but nothing will happen. Jail is for us, not them.
No, there is a chance, if Dems take Congress in the elections, that justice could be served. They could possibly impeach and indict, if serious wrong doing was found. 2/3 though--that would be a mighty lot of Democrats, so it would have to be serious enough crimes that some Republicans would agree.Like I said, and NOW the fun begins as the IG and his prosecutor go to work-)
To the REAL Democrats, sorry.
To the far Leftists----------->this is going to be soooooooo good-)
Won’t happen. It sucks, but nothing will happen. Jail is for us, not them.
So, most probably.....like you said, won't happen.
how many days has it been getting tighter for now?The noose is around Duh Donald's neck and I am lovin' that it gets tighter every fucking day.
No, there is a chance, if Dems take Congress in the elections, that justice could be served. They could possibly impeach and indict, if serious wrong doing was found. 2/3 though--that would be a mighty lot of Democrats, so it would have to be serious enough crimes that some Republicans would agree.Like I said, and NOW the fun begins as the IG and his prosecutor go to work-)
To the REAL Democrats, sorry.
To the far Leftists----------->this is going to be soooooooo good-)
Won’t happen. It sucks, but nothing will happen. Jail is for us, not them.
So, most probably.....like you said, won't happen.
