Kilroy2
Gold Member
- Dec 22, 2018
- 6,528
- 2,238
The same time you gave up horsesHow do you prove a negative ?As stated time and time and time again. Mueller was never going to indict the president, he was prohibited per DOJ policy of doing just that.
If he couldn't do anything they why investigate to begin with? But he told Barr three times, in front of witnesses the DOJ policy had nothing to do with his non-decision. Of course facts seem to elude you commies.
.
Yet the man has recently stated
Robert Mueller, in first public remarks, says charging Trump was 'not an option we because of Justice Department policy against indicting a sitting president
wow someone is lying
Actually those specific words never passed his lips, it was all insinuation and innuendo. He essentially placed the burden on Trump to prove himself innocent. How do you prove a negative?
.
well if the negative is wrong then it is easy to overcome
ie - the Sun revolves around the Earth now we know that it is the opposite
ie - if I owe 20 bucks and I earn 30 bucks now it is all good in a positive way
The only way is using the justice system in place.
Now people will always have their opinions
but once the system has played out and a decision of guilt or innocent was made, the only things that matter is the outcome
We will all have opinions on the positive outcome or negative outcome
Trump was doing the happy dance when no collusion was established so he clearly overcame the negative in that situation.
So we are still on the obstruction portion and a conclusion must be reached and as hard as he tries to do that happy dance, there are those who say
whoa, save that dance till the end
So when did you stop beating your wife?
.