Actually it changes a lot.
Subjective challenges the level of accuracy of the list. Arbitrary claims that list is complete garbage.
Telling that you make no distinction between those two words.
You want to admit that you are opposed to this discussion because you are emotionally invested in the idea that diversity is good and you dont' care about the facts?
Facts!
Here are the "facts"...some magazine made a list of totally subjective items to determine "quality of life".
The other fact is that if even if you agree 100% with their list...not a damn fucking thing on it is impacted by the color of one's skin.
I do not know if you have a job or have ever had a job, but never in my current job or previous job or my 20 years in the Marine Corps did I find that a color of a person's skin made any difference in how they preformed their jobs. There were shitty people of all colors and amazing people of all colors, no color had a higher percent of "shitty" people or better people.
The fact that you are a racist and judge people by the color of their skin is not something I can help, but I take solace in the fact that people like you and BL are a dying breed and you will die off eventually, and that day the world will be a better place.
You ever hear of the Roseto Effect?
Roseto effect - Wikipedia
So, what you are saying is that you cannot be close to someone of a different skin color or nationality
....t.
No, that is not what I am saying.
Then what was the point of your link?
Having a close knit community has real benefits to the people in it. Having a diverse community, loses those benefits.
Thus your rejection of the idea, and your race baiting, is refuted.