Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
tissue?
Blow me, you feckless kunt.
Snyd idiocy doesn't cover for the fact that you seek to eradicate history. You are a Stalinist shit bag who thinks you will get away with altering the past so as to pervert the future.
snide, dummy, snide
jesus, 5 years in sixth grade and you still can't spell single syllable words
carry on
Why do you want to keep statues that glorify Democrats who kept slaves?only idiots think a statue is history.
Yeah, that must be why all you idiots want them taken down.
Regardless of his 'Southern Gentleman' persona, Lee still took up arms against the United States in order to defend the institution of slavery. Personally, I don't particularly want that glorified in my town square.How about Robert E. Lee? Nathan Bedford Forrest was a better man than Abraham Lincoln.Statues don't teach history, they celebrate it. Take them all down tonight and the history will be there just fine, in the schools and libraries and museums.
A statue in the town square is a commemoration, a statement that this is the person we want to emulate, and wants our kids to idolize. I think we as a people have moved beyond wanting our kids growing up wanting to be just like Nathan Bedford Forrest.
Also, your second sentence is, to say the least, a minority opinion.
ROFL! How was it "illegal?" The perpetual union was dissolved when the Constitution was signed, moron. Your claim that it was illegal to secede has never been established. In fact, the Founding Fathers agreed that it was perfectly legal.It has nothing to do with the present, treasonous two parties that have taken control of an otherwise wonderful country. The Civil War was fought over the attempt of some states to unilaterally, illegally and immorally dissolve the Perpetual Union they had joined. This is clear and has been establish numerous times in other threads, as well as by history itself. This pining for a past that would embarrass anyone reasonable is a fetish difficult to understand, like sexual ones that 'normal' people can't fathom.So then the Republican Party is the party of traitors. Seems fair.Making war against a state of the union is treason. It says so in the Constitution.
Lincoln's party was a gang of traitors. That much is true.So then the Republican Party is the party of traitors. Seems fair.Making war against a state of the union is treason. It says so in the Constitution.
Why do you want to keep statues that glorify Democrats who kept slaves?only idiots think a statue is history.
Yeah, that must be why all you idiots want them taken down.
You're so full of double standards, that this picture is actually very representative of you. Pretending you don't have double standards when you clearly do.
Or we can just leave them right where they are. Why you think anyone is obligated to cater to the Orwellian demands of snowflakes mystifies me.They are made to HONOR GREAT EVENTS...dumbass.
Confederates have nothing to be honored for. They fought to perpetuate slavery by succeding from the Union. From historic perspective their cause was a disgrace.
You must have a reading comprehension problem, it's honor "GREAT EVENTS", similar to "ILLEGAL" immigrants.
Put up statues of Lincoln instead then.
At least statutes of Union generals, since half the state fought for the Union. Notice how that historical fact is never mentioned by these half wits?
The statues don't have to be destroyed. Put the ones that were actually erected in the 1800s in a museum and auction off the ones erected in the 1950s and 60s to racists to masturbate to at night.
The people who live there are entitled to whatever monuments they choose.The Confederacy was a nation built to ensure the preservation of slavery
It deserves no monuments
[
Statues are not history.
They are made to HONOR and commemorate - we should do niether for the Confederate cause, just as we should not honor or commemorate Nazi cause.
Your ilk are the ones trying to divide the country. I love the way scum like you throw a royal hissy fit about stuff that never bothered anyone in the past, and then claim your critics are "dividing the country." Apparently any resistance to your loathsome agenda is what it means to "divide the country."Are we trying to divide the country again over this? Are we going to hand victory to the power élite by allowing them to manipulate us this way?
Or, are these threads so bought and paid for by vested interests that only partisan posts remain and reason, thought, reflection and genuine debate are impossible?
What "agreement" are you referring to?Any adult who signs an agreement knows there are legal ramifications. That, indeed, is history.
That's an insult to cat turds.tissue?
Blow me, you feckless kunt.
Snyd idiocy doesn't cover for the fact that you seek to eradicate history. You are a Stalinist shit bag who thinks you will get away with altering the past so as to pervert the future.
snide, dummy, snide
jesus, 5 years in sixth grade and you still can't spell single syllable words
carry on
You have the IQ of a cat turd, derp.
AgreeThe people who live there are entitled to whatever monuments they choose.The Confederacy was a nation built to ensure the preservation of slavery
It deserves no monuments
Educate me - should Nazi statues be put up for "historic" reasons?
A statue isn't history. History is stuff that happened, not statues.
SPEACH, and yes it does....unless it is hateful racist speach, in which case you pretty much admit that statues represent hateful, racist past.
Why do you want to keep statues that glorify Democrats who kept slaves?only idiots think a statue is history.
Yeah, that must be why all you idiots want them taken down.
I really don't feel statues glorify anything, they are there to remind us of our past.
Biblical character David...thats who you feel is relvant ot this? WTF?
