Not so fast Republicans......

[JakeStarkey]

45.2	Roberts (R)
45.2	Orman (I)

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

today's avg on RCP

the GOP mainstream is fine

it is the far right of the party that is dying

 

[thanatos144]

Don't you facists get tired of being wrong all the time?

Tapatalk

 

[Listening]

45.2	Roberts (R)
45.2	Orman (I)

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

today's avg on RCP

the GOP mainstream is fine

it is the far right of the party that is dying

What a laugh.

Roberts is only going to win because of the far right wing of the party.

 

[Conservative65]

For months Republicans have been boasting of their inevitable taking of the Senate in 2014. It seems the tide has turned and a Republican win is less likely

Once having a 60-40 probability of taking the Senate, Democrats now have a 59-41 probability of holding the Senate

Are Republicans blowing their chance to retake the Senate? - The Week

Maybe people want politicians helping the country rather than playing politics on things like Benghazi.

good one leftard; but what would change anyway?
Dems have been the overall MAJORITY OF THE US GOVERNMENT FOR 8 YEARS and are have been blaming all their faiures on the minority Republicans anyway

Seems Democrats don't know inequalities. There are three basic elements in the law making portion of the government, both houses of Congress and the President. The Supreme Court, while it plays a role, comes in after the laws are made and challenged. Since, for the last 8 years, Democrats have had control of 2 of those 3, blaming it on Republicans is like saying 1 > 2.

 

[JakeStarkey]

45.2	Roberts (R)
45.2	Orman (I)

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

today's avg on RCP

the GOP mainstream is fine

it is the far right of the party that is dying

What a laugh.

Roberts is only going to win because of the far right wing of the party.

Not at all. If he wins, he will have the centrists he needs. If he loses, he will still have the far right.

Tis what is.

 

[JakeStarkey]

For months Republicans have been boasting of their inevitable taking of the Senate in 2014. It seems the tide has turned and a Republican win is less likely

Once having a 60-40 probability of taking the Senate, Democrats now have a 59-41 probability of holding the Senate

Are Republicans blowing their chance to retake the Senate? - The Week

Maybe people want politicians helping the country rather than playing politics on things like Benghazi.

good one leftard; but what would change anyway?
Dems have been the overall MAJORITY OF THE US GOVERNMENT FOR 8 YEARS and are have been blaming all their faiures on the minority Republicans anyway

Seems Democrats don't know inequalities. There are three basic elements in the law making portion of the government, both houses of Congress and the President. The Supreme Court, while it plays a role, comes in after the laws are made and challenged. Since, for the last 8 years, Democrats have had control of 2 of those 3, blaming it on Republicans is like saying 1 > 2.

GOP > 2

Takes all branches working together.

 

[whitehall]

The low information left finally realized that the elections are next month. It should be be noted that they went from claiming a democrat party dynasty to "not so fast republicans" in a couple of years of the Hussein administration. You almost gotta laugh that democrat candidates actually refuse to admit that they voted for Barry Hussein. Where does that leave the rank and file?

 

[Conservative65]

For months Republicans have been boasting of their inevitable taking of the Senate in 2014. It seems the tide has turned and a Republican win is less likely

Once having a 60-40 probability of taking the Senate, Democrats now have a 59-41 probability of holding the Senate

Are Republicans blowing their chance to retake the Senate? - The Week

Maybe people want politicians helping the country rather than playing politics on things like Benghazi.

good one leftard; but what would change anyway?
Dems have been the overall MAJORITY OF THE US GOVERNMENT FOR 8 YEARS and are have been blaming all their faiures on the minority Republicans anyway

Seems Democrats don't know inequalities. There are three basic elements in the law making portion of the government, both houses of Congress and the President. The Supreme Court, while it plays a role, comes in after the laws are made and challenged. Since, for the last 8 years, Democrats have had control of 2 of those 3, blaming it on Republicans is like saying 1 > 2.

GOP > 2

Takes all branches working together.

Only in your simple mind is a party holding 1 of the 3 portions greater than the party holding 2 of the 3. .

The problem with what you say about working together is that Democrats define that as the Republicans rubberstamping whatever they want. When statements to the effect of we won, get over it are used, that's plenty of proof.

 

[rightwinger]

For months Republicans have been boasting of their inevitable taking of the Senate in 2014. It seems the tide has turned and a Republican win is less likely

Once having a 60-40 probability of taking the Senate, Democrats now have a 59-41 probability of holding the Senate

Are Republicans blowing their chance to retake the Senate? - The Week

Maybe people want politicians helping the country rather than playing politics on things like Benghazi.

good one leftard; but what would change anyway?
Dems have been the overall MAJORITY OF THE US GOVERNMENT FOR 8 YEARS and are have been blaming all their faiures on the minority Republicans anyway

Seems Democrats don't know inequalities. There are three basic elements in the law making portion of the government, both houses of Congress and the President. The Supreme Court, while it plays a role, comes in after the laws are made and challenged. Since, for the last 8 years, Democrats have had control of 2 of those 3, blaming it on Republicans is like saying 1 > 2.

GOP > 2

Takes all branches working together.

Only in your simple mind is a party holding 1 of the 3 portions greater than the party holding 2 of the 3. .

The problem with what you say about working together is that Democrats define that as the Republicans rubberstamping whatever they want. When statements to the effect of we won, get over it are used, that's plenty of proof.

Except when you need all three to pass legislation

 

[Listening]

45.2	Roberts (R)
45.2	Orman (I)

[TBODY] [/TBODY]

today's avg on RCP

the GOP mainstream is fine

it is the far right of the party that is dying

What a laugh.

Roberts is only going to win because of the far right wing of the party.

Not at all. If he wins, he will have the centrists he needs. If he loses, he will still have the far right.

Tis what is.

Do they ever let you out of your room ?

You don't live in Kansas.....you don't know Kansas.

Moron.

 

[Listening]

Maybe people want politicians helping the country rather than playing politics on things like Benghazi.

good one leftard; but what would change anyway?
Dems have been the overall MAJORITY OF THE US GOVERNMENT FOR 8 YEARS and are have been blaming all their faiures on the minority Republicans anyway

Seems Democrats don't know inequalities. There are three basic elements in the law making portion of the government, both houses of Congress and the President. The Supreme Court, while it plays a role, comes in after the laws are made and challenged. Since, for the last 8 years, Democrats have had control of 2 of those 3, blaming it on Republicans is like saying 1 > 2.

GOP > 2

Takes all branches working together.

Only in your simple mind is a party holding 1 of the 3 portions greater than the party holding 2 of the 3. .

The problem with what you say about working together is that Democrats define that as the Republicans rubberstamping whatever they want. When statements to the effect of we won, get over it are used, that's plenty of proof.

Except when you need all three to pass legislation

No passing legislation works for me.

Defunding Obamacare will be just as good too.

 

[Listening]

North Carolina.....the state that gave you.....

John Edwards......

former democratic VP nominee......

Rielle Hunter apologizes for John Edwards affair

Edwards, a former senator and the 2004 Democratic vice presidential nominee, was indicted on six felony charges of misusing campaign money to cover up his affair. After a lengthy trial last year, Edwards was found not guilty on one count and a mistrial was declared on five others when the jury was deadlocked.

Now....we get Kay Hagan......

Can libs be more stupid ?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Listening whimpers at an accurate chart: typical.

She opines but then whines that others do the same.

 

[Conservative65]

good one leftard; but what would change anyway?
Dems have been the overall MAJORITY OF THE US GOVERNMENT FOR 8 YEARS and are have been blaming all their faiures on the minority Republicans anyway

Seems Democrats don't know inequalities. There are three basic elements in the law making portion of the government, both houses of Congress and the President. The Supreme Court, while it plays a role, comes in after the laws are made and challenged. Since, for the last 8 years, Democrats have had control of 2 of those 3, blaming it on Republicans is like saying 1 > 2.

GOP > 2

Takes all branches working together.

Only in your simple mind is a party holding 1 of the 3 portions greater than the party holding 2 of the 3. .

The problem with what you say about working together is that Democrats define that as the Republicans rubberstamping whatever they want. When statements to the effect of we won, get over it are used, that's plenty of proof.

Except when you need all three to pass legislation

No passing legislation works for me.

Defunding Obamacare will be just as good too.

If the bleeding hearts that believe one person has a right to healthcare funded by another would pay the premiums for those people, they would get what Obamacare was supposed to do and the rest of us wouldn't have to fund it.

 

[PredFan]

Oh please. How long did you have to search to find the one of hundreds of polls that said what you wanted it to say? Since a democrat victory is so sure now, you don't need to vote. Stay home.

 

[Listening]

Listening whimpers at an accurate chart: typical.

She opines but then whines that others do the same.

What chart was that.....the one that had no breakdown of the support for Roberts.

Accurate ?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Hmmm . . . you or the RCP.

hint . . . your opinion doesn't matter.

 

[Listening]

Hmmm . . . you or the RCP.

hint . . . your opinion doesn't matter.

And your accurate chart does not exist.

 

[JakeStarkey]

you lose

RealClearPolitics - Election 2014 - Kansas Senate - Roberts vs. Orman

 

[Silhouette]

Well one things for sure...I was all set to go vote if the conservatives on the Supreme Court took up the appeals on gay marriage/stood for letting people have their votes count.

But if conservatives aren't about having votes count and cannot even stand up to the gay mafia, why vote at all? Think if nothing happens by November I'll just sit with my feet up by the fire intstead that day. If something changes radically by then, their numbers might go back up again. If they stand out against gay marriage by the election, they're looking at traffic jams trying to get to the polls to vote for conservatives. I'll crawl on my belly in the mud to the polls to vote conservative if I have to..should that be the case.

Currently I and millions of others in the middle are patently unimpressed with "conservatives". That might change in the next week or two. We'll see.