Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I agree with everything you said except this. ^^ A person born to American parents abroad is considered a natural born citizen. They are issued two birth certificates--one from the hospital and one from the state department. I was born in Japan in 1951 and I am considered a natural born citizen and always have been. FYI.3rd. Someone born of a US citizen outside the US is not natural born. McCain got a pass because he was born in the Canal Zone, which was a US territory at the time.
JUst because they aren't in the pay of banana republican billionaires doesn't make them biased. Quite the opposite in fact.LOL. Yes, I highly democratic court. Who could have guessed?
Golfing Gator have you found the civil code for insurrection?What is the civil code for insurrection?
I can't find one.
Oooh, Typo Nazis.first. "wasn't qualified". think before you type.
2nd. Find any post where I bought into that stuff.
3rd. Someone born of a US citizen outside the US is not natural born. McCain got a pass because he was born in the Canal Zone, which was a US territory at the time.
No he didn't.
I agree with everything you said except this. ^^ A person born to American parents abroad is considered a natural born citizen. They are issued two birth certificates--one from the hospital and one from the state department. I was born in Japan in 1951 and I am considered a natural born citizen and always have been. FYI.
THey didn't ignore it, they found the claims unsupported, INCLUDING the Supreme Court, which is hardly "Left Wing".LMAO, the same place the CO supreme court got its info that Trump was guilty of insurrection. I'm glad we got that cleared up. The only difference is Trump made his case in court, the leftist courts that were supposed to look at the democrat voter fraud chose to ignore it. Try again, fool.
I look forward to Red States disqualifying key Democrats from the ballot for insurrection. Not even a charge is required per the new rules, let alone a conviction.
All of the Midwest can now be Democrat free at their will now.
New Rules now.
I mean the criminal acts that the Trump LAWYERS say he's immune from. The acts he did in order to IGNORE the will of the voters and stay in power.What criminal acts? Oh wait the trumped up (lol) acts you made up to impeach and prosecute him.
Jan 6th was a protest that got out of hand resulting in only 1 direct death, and that death was of an unarmed protester shot by a cop.
I mean the criminal acts that the Trump LAWYERS say he's immune from. The acts he did in order to IGNORE the will of the voters and stay in power.
Oooh, Typo Nazis.
I'm not wasting my time cataloging all the stupid things wingnuts say. Point is, the only difference between Trump and the other 16 bags of bad ideas was Trump was an open Birther... and you guys embraced him, even though he was lying.
Yes, he did. He fomented an insurrection with the intent to overturn an election. The only question is, will SCOTUS stand for the rule of law or not?
Great. We will nominate Obama then. Being able to vote doesn’t mean being able to vote for anyone. They still have to qualify for office.
WTF are you talking about a choice of one candidate? Even if Trump is declared ineligible in every state by SCOTUS, there’d still be a republican candidate.
I agree with everything you said except this. ^^ A person born to American parents abroad is considered a natural born citizen. They are issued two birth certificates--one from the hospital and one from the state department. I was born in Japan in 1951 and I am considered a natural born citizen and always have been. FYI.
Oooh, Typo Nazis.
I'm not wasting my time cataloging all the stupid things wingnuts say. Point is, the only difference between Trump and the other 16 bags of bad ideas was Trump was an open Birther... and you guys embraced him, even though he was lying.
Yes, he did. He fomented an insurrection with the intent to overturn an election. The only question is, will SCOTUS stand for the rule of law or not?
I mean the criminal acts that the Trump LAWYERS say he's immune from. The acts he did in order to IGNORE the will of the voters and stay in power.
So you’re going to disenfranchise us by not letting us vote for Obama.That actually breaks the rules, clearly breaks the rules.
Until your side made more shit up and got them disqualified.
So you’re going to disenfranchise us by not letting us vote for Obama.
No one made up anything about Trump. You just can’t bring yourself to acknowledge what he did.
That’s for the courts to decide.Trump is eligible under the Constitution, despite your shit interpretation of the 14th amendment.
That’s for the courts to decide.
Your shit interpretation of the constitution crumbled long ago so your lashing out at me is particularly hilarious.
Maybe. It’ll be hilarious to watch either way.And the SC will, probably with a 9-0 verdict.
They may, or they may not....And the SC will, probably with a 9-0 verdict.
That actually breaks the rules, clearly breaks the rules.
Until your side made more shit up and got them disqualified.
