Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We are trying to convict him in front of a jury but Trump has been doing everything to make sure that it never goes to trial. You are going to help him do it.Then convict him of it in front of a Jury.
If you are really comparing an age requirement and being born here the same as some court denying the people the right to vote for who they want to vote for (A previously elected President no less) than you are the biggest hack on the planet and deserve to die cold and alone, mourning the loss of all your loved ones before you.
At the moment Donald J. Trump is making the argument that a President of the United States is immune from all prosecution for acts he did in office. Including criminal acts. Not only have very similar arguments been rejected previously. He has made them, although in different context. They were rejected out of hand, including by the Supreme Court.
I've yet to see ANY Maga person EVER claim. Trump shouldn't try that.
Jan 6th was about the notion that the Vice-president of the United States under a certain way to read the Constitution had the right to ignore the vote tally certified by the States.
I've yet to see ANY Maga person claim.
Trump shouldn't have tried to get the VP to ignore the voters.
Your objection is not about the voters or respect for the Constitution. Your objection is to Trump being penalized for his actions.
You expect everyone to take those actions "lying down", and are pissed the judicial branch (not just Democrats) aren't.
We are trying to convict him in front of a jury but Trump has been doing everything to make sure that it never goes to trial. You are going to help him do it.
The Constitution provides very few limitations on who can be president and this is one of them.
Don't forget that this tactic was tried by Republicans with Obama. Payback is a bitch.
And we should ignore Trump's insurrection?Where has he been charged with Insurrection?
If he was truly foreign born, should we have ignored that?
When are you going to link to at least one case of ANYONE being charged or convicted of insurrection on J6?And we should ignore Trump's insurrection?
And we should ignore Trump's insurrection?
Don't pretend as if you give a fuck about democracy. Trump doesn't care. You don't care. All you care about is winning. Your support of Trump's attempt to overthrow the election based on your feelings is bullshit.
Facts and evidence were provided to the court in Colorado.What Insurrection?
Assuming facts not in evidence.
And banning your opponent from running is "caring about democracy"
LOLOL GO FUCK YOURSELF.
An insurrection with no charges for insurrection.Attempted insurrection.
Read the Colorado Supreme Court’s Decision Disqualifying Trump From the Ballot
Colorado’s top court ruled on Tuesday that former President Donald J. Trump is disqualified from holding office again because he engaged in insurrection leading up to the Jan. 6 storming of the Capitol. Here is the full ruling.www.nytimes.com
Facts and evidence were provided to the court in Colorado.
If Trump caused an insurrection, should we just ignore that?
Oh that's right. You think we should ignore the Constitution because half the country wants to.
You still haven't linked to any reputable source, or even msm that has reported ANY charges of insurrection. The only insurrection is in your addled, partisan mind. Wake up.Facts and evidence were provided to the court in Colorado.
If Trump caused an insurrection, should we just ignore that?
Oh that's right. You think we should ignore the Constitution because half the country wants to.
And when did you suddenly give a shit about due process? You were fine with taking away citizen's votes without convicting them of fraud in 2020.Facts and evidence were provided to the Dredd Scott and Plessey Courts. Meaningless statement is meaningless.
Prosecute him for it then. Oh wait, no one is doing that because he didn't partipate in an insurrection.
You ignore Due process, and the right to a trial by a jury of your peers for major crimes, and the right of people to vote for who they want to elect.
And when did you suddenly give a shit about due process? You were fine with taking away citizen's votes without convicting them of fraud in 2020.
This ^^^ is hilarious. The party of "They've been tried in the press. They're guilty if they're conservative. HANG 'EM." is pointing fingers. Lack of due process? Like J6 defendants? Like Trump for seven continuous years. Take it down the road Saul.And when did you suddenly give a shit about due process? You were fine with taking away citizen's votes without convicting them of fraud in 2020.
When you defended lawsuits that Trump and his corrupt cronies filed to take away our votes without proving fraud.Where Did I say that? The issue was if Fraud was found the votes should have been either discounted as fraudulent or a re-vote taken. The lawsuits used the proper channels, they were just ignored by activist or scared judges.
You are comparing apples and pitchforks.
When you defended lawsuits that Trump and his corrupt cronies filed to take away our votes without proving fraud.
You said yourself they couldn’t find fraud because it was “too hard” so they made up other reasons.
The only votes that were removed were those that were negated by fraudulent democrat actions. What is your opposition to investigating that fraud? You didn't seem to need any evidence to hound Trump for seven years.When you defended lawsuits that Trump and his corrupt cronies filed to take away our votes without proving fraud.
Your side tried to jury rig the electors clause to take away our votes without due process.They used the legal process available, not jury rigged a civil war amendment to apply to someone who was and is not an insurrectionist.
I stand by all my previous posts, dipshit.
FOAD.
Your side tried to jury rig the electors clause to take away our votes without due process.
The courts stopped you because you wanted to violate the constitution. As you already alluded to, that made enough to precipitate a violent riot and attempt to overthrow the election by force, otherwise known as an insurrection.
You are on the wrong side of every issue here. Your rank hypocrisy is astounding. You stand by your previous posts because you don't give a shit about democracy. You only care about winning.
Of course cheating violates the Constitution. Where did anyone get tried and convicted of this cheating?No we didn't. That's your made up fantasy bullshit.
Cheating doesn't violate the Constitution?
I'm on the side of the righteous, you prog SJW twat.
Die alone.
Of course cheating violates the Constitution. Where did anyone get tried and convicted of this cheating?
