Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Also, he's pretty heavy on suspecting players that have a couple of others defending them when the smart play for scum in the early game is to let votes melt off naturally as players flit from one wagon to the next.
Seems like an easy ploy to look helpful while misdirecting town.
Note away, I see you have nothing to say on my other comment.I wanted to know how many chances we had to kill the tyrant house. I think you were just looking for an excuse to vote for me since I had a vote on you earlier. I'll make a note of it
yes vote me so i can be out of this stupid game and watch the obviscum titus lead everyone to downfall
@Mertex, this sounds like a policy lynch bc you do not like Wolf's play. Let's suppose arguendo, Wolf is scum. I disagree but for sake of argument. It will be easier to lynch Wolf when the required votes will be less. We get rid of those who refuse to play before teaching lessons. Tunnelling people rarely teaches the lesson.
@Wolfsister77 The sane argument above is true for Mertex.
@Both, This setup lacks a nightkill I believe so that will be a huge boon. We can cut the fat and see the resistance.
@Scarlet. I voted for Wolfsister due to the reasons I gave. Also, I happen to know that WS gets very agitated and threatens to quit when she has been scum, before.
If I'm wrong, well, it won't be the first time. She claims that she has the right to state her opinion on any of the other players in any way she feels best, but then bemoans those of us who state our opinion on her gameplay. She continues to use anti-town play (bolded below).
Most of us have been the cause of a wagon at one time or another. We give our defense and hope it is believed, we don't threaten.
Also, regarding the backflips you say I'm doing over Josh-go back and read the post explaining why I am currently townreading him. I have a right to state my opinion on any of the other players in any way I feel is best. The problem is that some of you immediately scumread me and vote me for it on bad reasoning. Then attack me for using bad reasoning. It's annoying. Give me a good case against me. Tell me your reads of the other players. Because so many refuse to do either and instead are just going to vote me and go after me for stupid things, while ignoring anything else I say, then yes, I am going to get really fucking frustrated in case you haven't noticed. It's a waste of my time to play under those conditions.
When people want to play the game for real, I'll play, just like I always do. In the meantime I'm done banging my head against the wall and will do no more.
how come house doesn't know about the fact that the rebels need to take out the usurper?
@Wolfisister77
Your post asking to be replaced wasn't there when I started to type my post.
WolfSister77 - Null (seems townie, but participating in the bickering creates noise and goes against our win con)
RosieS - Leaning Town
So... you want to take ika's idea, and lynch him for advocating it?
That's interesting.
WolfSister77 - Null (seems townie, but participating in the bickering creates noise and goes against our win con)
RosieS - Leaning Town
LOL-Almost all of Rosie's contributions to this thread are bickering with me, voting for people that vote for her, and basically bullying and threatening me with a vote park for a vote on her I didn't even have while calling me a crap player for not noticing she's town telling just because she says she's town.
Good one House.
