Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obstruction of just only happens after a legal requirement to preserve evidence has been given to them. Prior to such, there is no such legal reuirement.You mean you are always s wrong. Every word of your post is wrong. Destroying the evidence is a crime in itself called "obstruction of justice." Evert email transmitted to or from her server was a crime.
This is why Trump got indicted. He claimed that national security documents were personal property. Which by law and Executive Order, are clearly the property of the current sitting president.He makes the determination simply by retaining them, you dumb fucking moron. There is no determination after he leaves office.
Wrong.Obstruction of just only happens after a legal requirement to preserve evidence has been given to them.
Destroying evidence of a crime is always a crime, you colossal dumbfuck.Prior to such, there is no such legal reuirement.
Fawn Hall (born September 15, 1959) is a former secretary to Lieutenant Colonel Oliver North and had a role in the Iran-Contra affair by helping North shred confidential documents.
Fawn Hall was never charged
You're committed a crime, but there is no evidence with which to charge you. So to use terms from literature, you committed the "perfect crime."So if your attempt to obstruct justice is successful you haven't committed a crime?
Your stupidity is monumental.
He got indicted because the Biden criminal gang is terrified of him, and for no other reason. As I already pointed out to you, a federal judge ruled that the president determines which records are personal. The documents Trump had in his possession became his the minute he left the White House with them.This is why Trump got indicted. He claimed that national security documents were personal property. Which by law and Executive Order, are clearly the property of the current sitting president.
Whether it's technically feasible to convict you is another matter. Now you're changing your argument. There was a mountain of evidence to convict Hillary. Comey chose to ignore it.You're committed a crime, but there is no evidence with which to charge you. So to use terms from literature, you committed the "perfect crime."
That's because Trump violated the espionage act, and obstructed justice in his violation of the PRA.First and foremost, President Trump is not being charged in violation of any law you just listed.
If he takes the documents with him, then he's made the determination.The PRA requires the president to make that determination "prior to leaving office"
The Presidential Records Act (PRA) requires the President to separate personal documents from Presidential records before leaving office. 44 U.S.C. 2203(b)
Once they become an ex-president, the determination of what's presidential and what's personal falls upon the National Archives.
He did no such thing.That's because Trump violated the espionage act, and obstructed justice in his violation of the PRA.
You're clearly clueless. Evidence is destroyed every day with no crime being committed.Wrong.
Destroying evidence of a crime is always a crime, you colossal dumbfuck.
So? North was granted immunity.
You're an idiot who doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.
Then votes to indict on various charges, no?You do not have the Grand Jury testimony so you have no idea what the Grand Jury discovered, or not discovered. The Grand Jury does not recommend which law applies, they simply conduct an investigation.
And the PRA says that the president has to make the determination BEFORE LEAVING OFFICE.As I already pointed out to you, a federal judge ruled that the president determines which records are personal.
Except votes to indict.A bunch of morons on a DC grand jury are authorities on nothing.
Whether it's technically feasible to convict you is another matter.
The grand jury says you're wrong. And they were legally sworn under color of law to make that determinationHe did no such thing.
A bunch of morons on a DC grand jury are authorities on nothing.
Plus it was a FLORIDA grand jury. Made up of all Florida residents. A state that voted for Trump.Except votes to indict.
Except, we are not talking about clowns at a circus, we are talking about Hillary Clinton.Don't be a clown. Destroying the evidence before they can catch you, means they have no evidence to arrest or charge you. That's just a simple fact.
The PRA allows President Trump to physically possess the documents.That's because Trump violated the espionage act, and obstructed justice in his violation of the PRA.
wrong. Not prosecuted is not the same as no crime.You're clearly clueless. Evidence is destroyed every day with no crime being committed.
Sure they can.Example: Businesses routinely dispose of records more than 7 years old. Even if those records contain evidence of a crime, they can't be charged with obstruction for destroying them.
