Crackerjaxon
Senior Member
- Nov 12, 2012
- 2,375
- 274
- 48
You need to look up antebellum.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm a racist, because I disagree with your view of black people???? LOLWTF? Go back and re-read the nonsense you just wrote. I don't even have counter as everyone can see the weakness in your ridiculous position.
Can't handle a solid inspection by an outsider of your imperfections. That's obvious.
You are a closet racist and snob. You wouldn't last 15 minutes in a stand-up dialogue with an opponent on a college campus or bookstore platform. One, your philsophical positions are indefensible, and, two, emotionally, you are so shallow and immature.
An aside: I bet you don't even read Langston Hughes or Claude McKay competently out loud to an audience.
You don't know me, or what I'm capable of....but you do, however, know I'm more than capable of handily handling mental midgets like you. And you pegged me correct by labeling me "a snob", as I am, in spades....and especially, in the close proximity of conservatives.
And fyi, I gave a performance , specifically reading from Langston Hughes, in concert with Kenneth Gayle and Rodney Waters, at The Heinen Theater, two years ago. Google them, retarded bitch.
.the democrats didnt support shit in the 50s, hell LBJ watered down the 1957 Civil Rights bill so the racists in the party wouldnt cause shit...he's a trojan horse, and you people fell for that crap
.the democrats didnt support shit in the 50s, hell LBJ watered down the 1957 Civil Rights bill so the racists in the party wouldnt cause shit...he's a trojan horse, and you people fell for that crap
L'il fella, stfu. We are talking about the sixties (1964, 1965). The Civil Rights and Voting acts of 1964 and 1965 was a Dem-led and GOP-supported action. The votes support that view.
The only revisionism is located in puss pocket racist brains today.
.the democrats didnt support shit in the 50s, hell LBJ watered down the 1957 Civil Rights bill so the racists in the party wouldnt cause shit...he's a trojan horse, and you people fell for that crap
L'il fella, stfu. We are talking about the sixties (1964, 1965). The Civil Rights and Voting acts of 1964 and 1965 was a Dem-led and GOP-supported action. The votes support that view.
The only revisionism is located in puss pocket racist brains today.
And both very conservative..the democrats didnt support shit in the 50s, hell LBJ watered down the 1957 Civil Rights bill so the racists in the party wouldnt cause shit...he's a trojan horse, and you people fell for that crap
L'il fella, stfu. We are talking about the sixties (1964, 1965). The Civil Rights and Voting acts of 1964 and 1965 was a Dem-led and GOP-supported action. The votes support that view.
The only revisionism is located in puss pocket racist brains today.
Put down the bong. I just proved Wallace and Faubus were two huge segregationists that were Dem.
Get over yourself.
![]()
And both very conservative.L'il fella, stfu. We are talking about the sixties (1964, 1965). The Civil Rights and Voting acts of 1964 and 1965 was a Dem-led and GOP-supported action. The votes support that view.
The only revisionism is located in puss pocket racist brains today.
Put down the bong. I just proved Wallace and Faubus were two huge segregationists that were Dem.
Get over yourself.
![]()
Put down the bong. I just proved Wallace and Faubus were two huge segregationists that were Dem. Get over yourself.![]()
Put down the bong. I just proved Wallace and Faubus were two huge segregationists that were Dem. Get over yourself.![]()
Faubus, Wallace, Goldwater opposed the action, among others. Nothing you have said above rebuts that the Dems led the charge in the 1960s aided by the GOP minority. We were talking about the sixties (1964, 1965). The Civil Rights and Voting acts of 1964 and 1965 was a Dem-led and GOP-supported action. The congressional votes support that view.
And both very conservative.L'il fella, stfu. We are talking about the sixties (1964, 1965). The Civil Rights and Voting acts of 1964 and 1965 was a Dem-led and GOP-supported action. The votes support that view.
The only revisionism is located in puss pocket racist brains today.
Put down the bong. I just proved Wallace and Faubus were two huge segregationists that were Dem.
Get over yourself.
![]()
Put down the bong. I just proved Wallace and Faubus were two huge segregationists that were Dem. Get over yourself.![]()
Faubus, Wallace, Goldwater opposed the action, among others. Nothing you have said above rebuts that the Dems led the charge in the 1960s aided by the GOP minority. We were talking about the sixties (1964, 1965). The Civil Rights and Voting acts of 1964 and 1965 was a Dem-led and GOP-supported action. The congressional votes support that view.
Put down the bong. I just proved Wallace and Faubus were two huge segregationists that were Dem. Get over yourself.![]()
Faubus, Wallace, Goldwater opposed the action, among others. Nothing you have said above rebuts that the Dems led the charge in the 1960s aided by the GOP minority. We were talking about the sixties (1964, 1965). The Civil Rights and Voting acts of 1964 and 1965 was a Dem-led and GOP-supported action. The congressional votes support that view.
You prove the Dems led the charge. This is your assertion. You prove it.
.the democrats didnt support shit in the 50s, hell LBJ watered down the 1957 Civil Rights bill so the racists in the party wouldnt cause shit...he's a trojan horse, and you people fell for that crap
L'il fella, stfu. We are talking about the sixties (1964, 1965). The Civil Rights and Voting acts of 1964 and 1965 was a Dem-led and GOP-supported action. The votes support that view.
The only revisionism is located in puss pocket racist brains today.
Put down the bong. I just proved Wallace and Faubus were two huge segregationists that were Dem.
Get over yourself.
![]()
And both very conservative.Put down the bong. I just proved Wallace and Faubus were two huge segregationists that were Dem.
Get over yourself.
![]()
Oh bite me.I know this argument well.
Who can I be now?
Lincoln was "liberal". The KKK were "conservative" democrats. Jim Crow laws were enacted by "ultra right wing democrats".
Shall I continue? I know everything out there. I know your talking points very well.
I've seen such bullshit on such a repetitive basis before it makes one want to bazooka barf.
And both very conservative.
Oh bite me.I know this argument well.
Who can I be now?
Lincoln was "liberal". The KKK were "conservative" democrats. Jim Crow laws were enacted by "ultra right wing democrats".
Shall I continue? I know everything out there. I know your talking points very well.
I've seen such bullshit on such a repetitive basis before it makes one want to bazooka barf.
Lincoln was a liberal
KKK was conservative
Jim Crow was enacted by southerners of both parties
OMG, the cutoff is knowing them really well. Yeah I knew the guy I was working for, and pretty well, but probably not that well. I mean do I have to explain this to you? There are some things you say to close friends you dont say to others.
But watch the clip, I bring it up and you dismiss it, it's not about sports, it's about the racist attitude of blacks who get pissed when other date white chicks or when they vote republican....because if you do either you're not really black, whatever that means.
WTF? Why would you fucking say it at all? You're one of those racist fucks that just has to say it, aren't you? I'm all for interracial dating and marriage. I'm in an interracial marriage. I have interracial marriages in my family. WTF?
you just said that Thomas has a white trophy wife. Why say that then?
and no I dont have to say it, man you have some obsession over a word, you need to get that checked into, it's pathological.
I'm a racist, because I disagree with your view of black people???? LOLCan't handle a solid inspection by an outsider of your imperfections. That's obvious.
You are a closet racist and snob. You wouldn't last 15 minutes in a stand-up dialogue with an opponent on a college campus or bookstore platform. One, your philsophical positions are indefensible, and, two, emotionally, you are so shallow and immature.
An aside: I bet you don't even read Langston Hughes or Claude McKay competently out loud to an audience.
You don't know me, or what I'm capable of....but you do, however, know I'm more than capable of handily handling mental midgets like you. And you pegged me correct by labeling me "a snob", as I am, in spades....and especially, in the close proximity of conservatives.
And fyi, I gave a performance , specifically reading from Langston Hughes, in concert with Kenneth Gayle and Rodney Waters, at The Heinen Theater, two years ago. Google them, retarded bitch.
I know exactly of what you are capble: very little. Now, instead of dissing the challenged, you are dissing women. Those who perform at The Heinen etc are an elitist and liberal set of artists more known for leftist causes than artistic talent. Be that as it may: I said you did not read Hughes or McKay competently. Nothing in the research shows anything differently.