Remember what Hillary said about challenging election results in the debate?

[AnCap'n_Murica]

You actually believe we have official election results the day of the election?

STATES have 3-4 weeks before their election results are fully counted and then certified.... TV may make us think the election is over on election day, BUT IT IS NOT, and has NEVER BEEN over on election day....

these processes of counting absentees and provisional ballots and recounts are ALL PART OF THE PROCESS and the results ARE NOT FINAL until the fat lady sings, and she does not sing, until all state votes are counted and certified.

The election has already been conceded. Then there's this little tidbit:

Stein is a liar and prop player for the Clintons.

 

[Clementine]

Interesting, huh? What an audacious and disingenuous political hack. She is completely going against what she said in the debate when Trump said he would have to wait and see what the results were before he decides if he is going to ask for a recount. This is what she said about that. Try to read it without laughing out loud, knowing she is challenging the results.

CLINTON: So that is not the way our democracy works. We've been around for 240 years. We've had free and fair elections. We've accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them. And that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election. You know, President Obama said the other day when you're whining before the game is even finished...it just shows you're not up to doing the job. And let's -- you know, let's be clear about what he is saying and what that means. He is denigrating -- he's talking down our democracy. And I, for one, am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that kind of position.

The funny part is that Jill Stein is just doing this to raise money for her green party. She even criticized Hillary for supporting a recount.


"Why would Hillary Clinton—who conceded the election to Donald Trump—want #Recount2016? You cannot be on-again, off-again about democracy.

Why would Hillary Clinton—who holds "public" and "private" positions—want to engage in something as transparent as #Recount2016?"


After calling for a recount, Jill Stein drops BOMB on HILLARY... - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com

Hilarious. Hillary is a born grifter.

And she doesn't realize that Stein managed to humiliate her one last time. Not only did Stein make Hillary look like a hypocrite for supporting a recount but she managed to bilk Hillary's supporters out of $6 million and counting. And since there won't be a recount, all that money will go to Stein's party. She must be laughing now and saying "Thanks, suckers!"

 

[FA_Q2]

Wouldn't be what? Afraid of a recount? No, why should she be? And no, she would NEVER diminish herself to tweeting like a spoiled child with a silver spoon in his mouth....

He needs to grow up and start acting like a President....

She would never diminish herself to tweeting like a spoiled child, but she's going to have three states recounted because she thought she should have won but didn't; no other reason.

Who needs to grow a pair again?

Hello? Is anybody home?

clinton did NOT call for the recounts, she accepted the results, it was not until the computer scientists came out and said that machines with electronic voting gave Hillary 7% less votes than ALL OTHER VOTING MACHINES WITH A PAPER TRAIL THAT Jill Stein asked for a recount. NOT Hillary, her team of lawyers will simply be monitors

. Now why would Jill ask for a recount ???? Is Hillary paying her under the table while hiding out ??

That is the real question - why the hell is Stein asking for a recount - it is irrelevant. How does she even have standing to do so - her result is conclusive in that she did not win.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

That is the real question - why the hell is Stein asking for a recount - it is irrelevant. How does she even have standing to do so - her result is conclusive in that she did not win.

There's a lot of people going to make a lot of money on this scam. Stein is only doing Hillary's work for her since Hillary remembers how she bashed Trump for saying he wouldn't concede the election if he thought something was wrong.

What I really would like to know is where these donations are coming from. She raised an awful lot of money awfully quickly for just a recount.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Interesting, huh? What an audacious and disingenuous political hack. She is completely going against what she said in the debate when Trump said he would have to wait and see what the results were before he decides if he is going to ask for a recount. This is what she said about that. Try to read it without laughing out loud, knowing she is challenging the results.

CLINTON: So that is not the way our democracy works. We've been around for 240 years. We've had free and fair elections. We've accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them. And that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election. You know, President Obama said the other day when you're whining before the game is even finished...it just shows you're not up to doing the job. And let's -- you know, let's be clear about what he is saying and what that means. He is denigrating -- he's talking down our democracy. And I, for one, am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that kind of position.

Remember when Trump said the election was rigged?

 

[beagle9]

Interesting, huh? What an audacious and disingenuous political hack. She is completely going against what she said in the debate when Trump said he would have to wait and see what the results were before he decides if he is going to ask for a recount. This is what she said about that. Try to read it without laughing out loud, knowing she is challenging the results.

CLINTON: So that is not the way our democracy works. We've been around for 240 years. We've had free and fair elections. We've accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them. And that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election. You know, President Obama said the other day when you're whining before the game is even finished...it just shows you're not up to doing the job. And let's -- you know, let's be clear about what he is saying and what that means. He is denigrating -- he's talking down our democracy. And I, for one, am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that kind of position.

The funny part is that Jill Stein is just doing this to raise money for her green party. She even criticized Hillary for supporting a recount.


"Why would Hillary Clinton—who conceded the election to Donald Trump—want #Recount2016? You cannot be on-again, off-again about democracy.

Why would Hillary Clinton—who holds "public" and "private" positions—want to engage in something as transparent as #Recount2016?"


After calling for a recount, Jill Stein drops BOMB on HILLARY... - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com

. Raise money for her green party by a recount ?? How do you raise money by a recount ?? If people send money to her, will she be able to keep some of the money raised or shouldn't she have to give the excess or overruns to charity ??? Clintons foundation is supposed to be a charity or something isn't it, but wasn't she and Bill abusing the foundation also ??

 

[beagle9]

Wouldn't be what? Afraid of a recount? No, why should she be? And no, she would NEVER diminish herself to tweeting like a spoiled child with a silver spoon in his mouth....

He needs to grow up and start acting like a President....

She would never diminish herself to tweeting like a spoiled child, but she's going to have three states recounted because she thought she should have won but didn't; no other reason.

Who needs to grow a pair again?

Hello? Is anybody home?

clinton did NOT call for the recounts, she accepted the results, it was not until the computer scientists came out and said that machines with electronic voting gave Hillary 7% less votes than ALL OTHER VOTING MACHINES WITH A PAPER TRAIL THAT Jill Stein asked for a recount. NOT Hillary, her team of lawyers will simply be monitors

. Now why would Jill ask for a recount ???? Is Hillary paying her under the table while hiding out ??

As I have mentioned, Jill Stein had NO LOVE at all for Hillary Clinton, and her ads were downright NASTY against Hillary....

She says she felt the election could be wrong due to hackers and the anomaly the computer scientists found and due to the Russian involvement during the race and that we the people, deserve to know if it was tampered with or not.

. Not buying it... Most if not all 3rd party or independent candidates disappear immediately after an election, now what's going on here ???

 

[beagle9]

Interesting, huh? What an audacious and disingenuous political hack. She is completely going against what she said in the debate when Trump said he would have to wait and see what the results were before he decides if he is going to ask for a recount. This is what she said about that. Try to read it without laughing out loud, knowing she is challenging the results.

CLINTON: So that is not the way our democracy works. We've been around for 240 years. We've had free and fair elections. We've accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them. And that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election. You know, President Obama said the other day when you're whining before the game is even finished...it just shows you're not up to doing the job. And let's -- you know, let's be clear about what he is saying and what that means. He is denigrating -- he's talking down our democracy. And I, for one, am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that kind of position.

Remember when Trump said the election was rigged?

. He was right in that the MSM tried everything it could to fool the voters with it's biased rehtoric, and slanted reporting, lies and innuendo. Then there was the crap that was done to Bernie where as it was the same thing they were attempting to do to Trump and he knew it.. They jumped the shark though, and they regret it came out as to what they had done. The New York Times at least tried to clear the air in it's organization... The recap of this stuff is unbelievable, but the losers keep trying to twist themselves into pretzel's.. lol.

 

[easyt65]

Rewriting History again, eh?

NO

 

[Clementine]

Interesting, huh? What an audacious and disingenuous political hack. She is completely going against what she said in the debate when Trump said he would have to wait and see what the results were before he decides if he is going to ask for a recount. This is what she said about that. Try to read it without laughing out loud, knowing she is challenging the results.

CLINTON: So that is not the way our democracy works. We've been around for 240 years. We've had free and fair elections. We've accepted the outcomes when we may not have liked them. And that is what must be expected of anyone standing on a debate stage during a general election. You know, President Obama said the other day when you're whining before the game is even finished...it just shows you're not up to doing the job. And let's -- you know, let's be clear about what he is saying and what that means. He is denigrating -- he's talking down our democracy. And I, for one, am appalled that somebody who is the nominee of one of our two major parties would take that kind of position.

The funny part is that Jill Stein is just doing this to raise money for her green party. She even criticized Hillary for supporting a recount.


"Why would Hillary Clinton—who conceded the election to Donald Trump—want #Recount2016? You cannot be on-again, off-again about democracy.

Why would Hillary Clinton—who holds "public" and "private" positions—want to engage in something as transparent as #Recount2016?"


After calling for a recount, Jill Stein drops BOMB on HILLARY... - Allen B. West - AllenBWest.com

. Raise money for her green party by a recount ?? How do you raise money by a recount ?? If people send money to her, will she be able to keep some of the money raised or shouldn't she have to give the excess or overruns to charity ??? Clintons foundation is supposed to be a charity or something isn't it, but wasn't she and Bill abusing the foundation also ??

The conditions were that any money over and above what would be needed to apply for a recount would be kept by the Green Party and she gave a vague explanation of what it would go for, something about ensuring election integrity in the future. In other words, her party keeps the money and it will likely be spent on campaigns in the future. No intentions of giving the money back whether there is a recount or not. It's doubtful there will be any as the deadline is tomorrow and states require a reason to spend the money recounting votes. Even Obama stated that there is no sign of hacking or anything else that would justify a recount.

So, last I heard, Stein had taken in over $6 million (some sources saying about $7 million). Even if she spent money to apply for a recount in the 3 states it would take less than $2 million to do so. That's a lot of extra money that will be kept by her and her party.

 

[Clementine]

Remember when Trump said the election was rigged?

There were reports of Dem cheating. One poll worker witnessed co-workers filling out stacks of ballots prior to the election. In another location, boxes of ballots were delivered to a guy's house. Obama came out and told illegal aliens they could vote, which meant millions of extra votes for Hillary. We had George Soros saying that Hillary had the electoral votes and he made it sound like the fix was in.

There may have been some cheating but most likely on the Dem side. Unfortunately for Hillary, it still wasn't enough.

It was like when Al Franken lost initially and then, like magic, a trunk full of ballots for him appeared in a poll workers car a week later. Yea, all on the up and up. I am willing to bet that those were ballots intended for legally registered voters who didn't show up at the polls. All they had to do was fill them out and check off the names of legal voters to make it appear that they had cast the ballots.

There must be a reason why Dems want motor voter and fight against states updating voter rolls. Motor voter ensures millions of legal voters being registered but only a third actually voting. That means the majority of ballots up for grabs. The left also fights against anything which could potentially stop millions of illegal aliens from voting. Obama was asked specifically if illegals had to worry about being caught and deported if they voted and Obama told them no worries.

 

[Londoner]

Mrs. Clinton is not challenging the election. Others are doing it. Not she.

Don't bother. The OP is deeply partisan, confused and prone to distortion.

Trump said several times that the election was rigged, but said these things prior to the election, and in the absence of actionable proof that anything illegal had happened.

Trump also said that he would not accept the results if he lost.

Nobody ever said he couldn't ask for a recount if the vote totals of a given state fell inside the stipulated margin.

The Clinton camp came out and said that they found not evidence of hacking. They rebuffed the University of Michigan professors who reported statistical irregularities. However, when the Green Party said they were going forward no matter what, the Clinton team obviously wanted to be involved. Trump will also have lawyers there.

The OP is cherry picking.

 

[beagle9]

Mrs. Clinton is not challenging the election. Others are doing it. Not she.

Don't both. The OP is deeply partisan, confused and prone to distortion.

The criticism of Trump was based on the fact that he said several times that the election was rigged, and he made these comments prior to the election, and in the absence of actionable proof that anything illegal had happened.

Trump also said that he would not accept the results if he lost.

The Clinton camp came out and said that they found not evidence of hacking. They rebuffed the University of Michigan professors who reported statistical irregularities. However, when the Green Party said they were going forward no matter what, the Clinton team obviously wanted to be involved. Trump will also have lawyers there.

The OP is cherry picking.

. That is not what Trump said at all... He said that he wasn't going to say one way or the other about excepting the election results (left it open). He did not say he wasn't going to except the results.

 

[keepitreal]

During the campaign, Clinton made a major issue of Trump's refusal to say he would accept the results of the election no matter what. Now she is suddenly interested in contesting the results of the election, an election she had previously conceded.

Judge Jeanine uses Hillary's own words to prove she is nothing but a whining hypocrite. Check it out:

Judge Jeanine: I, for one, am appalled, Hillary

Probably one of the reasons she had Stein do it for her instead.

Probably one of the reasons she had Stein do it for her instead.

ROFLMAO... Well, of course!
How else do you explain Jill raising more money, in less then a week,
then she did for her campaign, over the course of, what, a yr

 

[Londoner]

Mrs. Clinton is not challenging the election. Others are doing it. Not she.

Don't both. The OP is deeply partisan, confused and prone to distortion.

The criticism of Trump was based on the fact that he said several times that the election was rigged, and he made these comments prior to the election, and in the absence of actionable proof that anything illegal had happened.

Trump also said that he would not accept the results if he lost.

The Clinton camp came out and said that they found not evidence of hacking. They rebuffed the University of Michigan professors who reported statistical irregularities. However, when the Green Party said they were going forward no matter what, the Clinton team obviously wanted to be involved. Trump will also have lawyers there.

The OP is cherry picking.

. That is not what Trump said at all... He said that he wasn't going to say one way or the other about excepting the election results (left it open). He did not say he wasn't going to except the results.

He said he would only accept the results if he wins.

But yes, you are right - in a debate he said he wasn't going to commit either way. But the thing that bothered people were his comments about not accepting a loss. This suggests that he wasn't going to accept the final results, which includes recounts (if legally permitted and executed). Had he simply stated that he was going to avail himself of his legal options, it wouldn't have made that much news because every candidate obviously has a right to do that. Respectfully.

 

[keepitreal]

Clinton isn't asking for a recount.

From what I read, she has joined forces with it.

No. Wrong again. They are just observing it. Not joining forces. Read more carefully.

No. Wrong again. They are just observing it. Not joining forces. Read more carefully.

Keep up to date on the stories you've read, more often

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

That is not what Trump said at all... He said that he wasn't going to say one way or the other about excepting the election results (left it open). He did not say he wasn't going to except the results.

Correct, he did say he would have to look at the circumstances first. However Hillary said just the opposite; she would accept the results because doing otherwise would be a danger to democracy.

 

[Esmeralda]

Clinton isn't asking for a recount.

From what I read, she has joined forces with it.

No. Wrong again. They are just observing it. Not joining forces. Read more carefully.

No. Wrong again. They are just observing it. Not joining forces. Read more carefully.

Keep up to date on the stories you've read, more often

She did not initiate it. She is not involved in it. She is observing. THAT is the story.

 

[NoNukes]

Mrs. Clinton is not challenging the election. Others are doing it. Not she.

It is the MAJORITY of Americans who vote for her.

 

[Freewill]

She is doing this as if we need a reminder of why she lost in the first place.