The T
George S. Patton Party
And the welfare monster will grow...
anchor babies anyone...?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
And the welfare monster will grow...
anchor babies anyone...?
Those numbers are all over the place and can't be tied to anything except maybe RvW.
Did you even look at the links? The STD rates show state-by-state comparisons of the per population rates of their respective diseases. Why the Hell are you talking about Roe v Wade? That has nothing to do with any of this.
So I guess teaching abstinence really is effective.
Obviously not. Because if that were the truth, then Texas would have among the lowest rates of teen pregnancy, and of STD cases. Yet Texas ranks among the top in all of these. Texas is just about the only place in the country where teen births continue to be on the rise. If abstinence only is working, why are Texas teens still having sex and having more babies than the rest of the country? If it's working, why are Texans coming down with more STDs than almost anyone in the rest of the country? Your best argument is to invoke Roe v Wade? Are you fucking serious? Okay, we have a NEW stupidest thing ever said on this board.
anchor babies anyone...?
per your request in red below
you may want the GOP to stay way from moral issues now....but if they simply "let things happen" you, yourself, will ulitmately be disappoointed.
I think gays should get the same benefits as we straights. So there's one. I have a couple friends who like you, wore the Birdie on the Ball for decades. Some were ForeCon. They were doing walkabouts in Afghanistan and lost the translator who kept them away from bad juju because he was gay. Took FIVE WEEKS to get another guy who could speak fluent Pashtu or whatever the hell it was. Guess how they felt about that?Same here. I mean, he wasn't part of their team. He sat with the 5/5 I think it was, and monitored chatter etc... So there/s that. I don't think using BC is immoral AT ALL. Also, I was a volunteer at The Storefront Teen Crisis center. So although I went in pro-life, I'm now pro-choice.
They did not bring up the issue of birth control...it was buried in the healthcare law and came out recently....so it HAD TO BE addressed.
You see, I am a true proponent of the free market. It works. It always has.
If a company does not want to offer a service, such is their choice...and should be their choice. And you know what happens? Someone else does, and that copmpany gets a larger chunk of market share.
I'm sensing Libertarian and I disagree with the philosophy that the Market Corrects such problems. If it did, you would be able to find out why I won't work with Skadden Arps under any circumstances. Wal-Mart would be out of business. So would Squibb Bristol-Meyers, Eli Lilly, Kaiser and so on.
We dont want government telling us what we MUST sell. I have no issue with government telling us what we CANT sell....that keeps the greedy in check....but when it comes to telling us what we MUST sell...the key word being MUST....? That is over the line. That is tyranny.
That is how you view it but I respectfully disagree. Insurance companies have a long and documented history of abuse, market manipulation, price fixing and wrongfully denying benefits. If they weren't regulated, the abuse would be much worse.
If you want a BLT and a restaurant doesnt sell it becuase it is Kosher...what will you do? Go to another restaurant, of course. That is the free market at its finest.
In theory yes. Wish it always worked that way but it doesn't.
If you want birth control and your carrier doesnt cover it....what should you do? Go to another carrier....or pay for it out of pocket if you are otherwise happy with the carrier.
And when all those insurance execs get together and decide they all find bone-marrow transplants "morally objectionable"? High priced drugs and other treatments? And guess what? Americans are captive consumers because most can only afford insruance through their employer. So they don't have the choice you mention on a practical level.
If your employer doesnt pay you what you think you deserve, what will you do? Look for a higher paying job. If you deserve more, you will get it elsewhwere...and if you dont, then maybe you dont deserve it.
Free market...not government...is the answer.
So all that being said....and here is where it gets good.....
I am pro choice...and further more...I have no issue with birth control....I disagree wholehearetedly with Rick Santorum as it pertains to BC....but I also know what he said and what he feels....it is his personal faith....but he is not telling ANYONE they must follow his way.....
At least he was honest...anmd it pisses me off how the left is taking what he said and making it as if he plans to mandate all foolow his ideology.
Well he and Romney have both stated that they would attempt exactly that, during the last few days.
It is BS and taking away from what is going to be a very impoortant time in our history.
In essence, we have the likes of MSNBC and FOX deciding where our country goes.
And it is very dsiturbing to me.
While I disagree with much of it, it is a rational post.
Thank you for your service btw.
Thanks...but curious...
What do you disagree with and why?
anchor babies anyone...?
Top 10 States With Highest Teenage Pregnancy and Birth Rates
1. Nevada (113)
2. Arizona (104)
3. Mississippi (103)
4. New Mexico (103)
5. Texas (101)
6. Florida (97)
7. California (96)
8. Georgia (95)
9. North Carolina (95)
10. Arkansas (93)
States ranked by rates of live births among women age 15-19 (births per thousand):
Mississippi (71)
Texas (69)
Arizona (67)
Arkansas (66)
New Mexico (66)
Georgia (63)Louisiana (62)
Nevada (61)
Alabama (61)
Oklahoma (60)
anchor babies anyone...?
I know I'm pumping you full of shit.
I know I'm pumping you full of shit.
Hey, that's all I'm asking; for you to admit that the abstinence only policy is a horrid failure and a detriment to society.
Here's the thing...to baby killers like inthemiddle, dead babies are preferable to live ones. They count live babies as FAILURE because it shows the unfortunate expansion of what they consider a loathesome population.
True story.
I know I'm pumping you full of shit.
Hey, that's all I'm asking; for you to admit that the abstinence only policy is a horrid failure and a detriment to society.
where was that policy implemented?
by and large....yes along with teaching them responsibility....handing out rubbers like candy only encourages promiscuity.....guess you don't know what abstinence-only education teaches....i believe it is having some positive effect today on teen pregnancy rates which soared for years after "free sex" took hold of society...
well it sure seems to be a policy issue to PP and liberals who want to hand them out like candy and force churches and insurance companies to pay for them....
we seem to be back to my earlier question that you didn't answer.....'thou shalt not kill' is a religious belief.....so why is it law?........why can't people just decide for themselves....?
...laws have a funny way of "encouraging" moral or immoral behavior...![]()
so far the liberal solution has not been working......it's produced high unmarried pregnancy rates and plenty of abortions...neither is good for society....
anchor babies anyone...?
anchor babies anyone...?
Ok THAT'S fucking hilarious. So you bitch about how everyone should be using abstinence only education, then ITM stuffs stats down your throat showing that it's ineffective so you jump to calling them anchor babies. Man you are some piece of work.