g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 125,228
- 68,948
The courts have said they are not unconstitutional, but they also have said they accomplish nothing. You can make a law to do 10 jumping jacks before you vote, with waivers for the handicapped, and it would be constitutional, too. But if I claimed jumping jacks made voting more secure, you would instantly understand what a stupid claim that would be.Not in every case, it hasn't. The courts have ruled some states' Voter ID laws are too restrictive.
True, but requiring ID to vote in general is not unconstitutional.
It's just too bad the rubes have not caught on that Voter ID is as effective as jumping jacks. They have been given a false sense of security which actually aids and abets voter fraud.