S#!+ Gets Real Now. Trump Properties Targeted

[pknopp]

As we have done by the tens of thousands.

As we have done by the tens of thousands.

It is called collateral damage and it is an unfortunate unavoidable part of war. If you hate the country get the fuck out.

When we do it we call it collateral damage. When someone else does it we call it terrorism. I do not have to leave to want to change our hypocrisy.

No, when someone kills civilians on purpose we call it a war crime.

Good with me. How do we get the charges filed?

Prove America did that.

You don't bomb a hospital. You simply do not do that.

 

[Lastamender]

It is called collateral damage and it is an unfortunate unavoidable part of war. If you hate the country get the fuck out.

When we do it we call it collateral damage. When someone else does it we call it terrorism. I do not have to leave to want to change our hypocrisy.

No, when someone kills civilians on purpose we call it a war crime.

Good with me. How do we get the charges filed?

Prove America did that.

You don't bomb a hospital. You simply do not do that.

If there is a stock plie of weapons in it you sure as Hell do.

 

[pknopp]

When we do it we call it collateral damage. When someone else does it we call it terrorism. I do not have to leave to want to change our hypocrisy.

No, when someone kills civilians on purpose we call it a war crime.

Good with me. How do we get the charges filed?

Prove America did that.

You don't bomb a hospital. You simply do not do that.

If there is a stock plie of weapons in it you sure as Hell do.

There wasn't and even then you do not do that.

 

[daveman]

It's inevitable that at some time they will retaliate. We would do no less.

I've often thought that when that day comes they target the war mongers directly as opposed to the people in general.

Terrorists don't do that. They prefer to kill innocent, uninvolved people.

As we have done by the tens of thousands.

We did target a war monger. Y'all lost your shit about it.

You can stop pretending you hold the moral high ground. You don't care how many brown people die as long as Trump doesn't get his way.

 

[daveman]

No, when someone kills civilians on purpose we call it a war crime.

Good with me. How do we get the charges filed?

Prove America did that.

You don't bomb a hospital. You simply do not do that.

If there is a stock plie of weapons in it you sure as Hell do.

There wasn't and even then you do not do that.

The Law of Armed Conflict designates certain structures as having protected status...schools, hospitals, places of worship.

However, if combat activities are conducted from those structures, they lose their protected status and may be attacked.

Non-Western enemies love to attack from protected structures. The left takes their side when we legally attack those who attack us.

 

[pknopp]

It's inevitable that at some time they will retaliate. We would do no less.

I've often thought that when that day comes they target the war mongers directly as opposed to the people in general.

Terrorists don't do that. They prefer to kill innocent, uninvolved people.

As we have done by the tens of thousands.

We did target a war monger. Y'all lost your shit about it.

You can stop pretending you hold the moral high ground. You don't care how many brown people die as long as Trump doesn't get his way.

I've been every bit as against Obama and Hillary's war mongering. I refused to vote for Hillary over it and didn't vote for Obama over it.

There are a small number of people with principles. A number of them here but we are the minority unfortunately.

 

[pknopp]

Good with me. How do we get the charges filed?

Prove America did that.

You don't bomb a hospital. You simply do not do that.

If there is a stock plie of weapons in it you sure as Hell do.

There wasn't and even then you do not do that.

The Law of Armed Conflict designates certain structures as having protected status...schools, hospitals, places of worship.

However, if combat activities are conducted from those structures, they lose their protected status and may be attacked.

Non-Western enemies love to attack from protected structures. The left takes their side when we legally attack those who attack us.

Combat activities were NOT being done out of the hospital.

 

[Lastamender]

Prove America did that.

You don't bomb a hospital. You simply do not do that.

If there is a stock plie of weapons in it you sure as Hell do.

There wasn't and even then you do not do that.

The Law of Armed Conflict designates certain structures as having protected status...schools, hospitals, places of worship.

However, if combat activities are conducted from those structures, they lose their protected status and may be attacked.

Non-Western enemies love to attack from protected structures. The left takes their side when we legally attack those who attack us.

Combat activities were NOT being done out of the hospital.

Storing weapons for combat is just as good.

 

[pknopp]

You don't bomb a hospital. You simply do not do that.

If there is a stock plie of weapons in it you sure as Hell do.

There wasn't and even then you do not do that.

The Law of Armed Conflict designates certain structures as having protected status...schools, hospitals, places of worship.

However, if combat activities are conducted from those structures, they lose their protected status and may be attacked.

Non-Western enemies love to attack from protected structures. The left takes their side when we legally attack those who attack us.

Combat activities were NOT being done out of the hospital.

Storing weapons for combat is just as good.

Which wasn't done either.

 

[daveman]

It's inevitable that at some time they will retaliate. We would do no less.

I've often thought that when that day comes they target the war mongers directly as opposed to the people in general.

Terrorists don't do that. They prefer to kill innocent, uninvolved people.

As we have done by the tens of thousands.

We did target a war monger. Y'all lost your shit about it.

You can stop pretending you hold the moral high ground. You don't care how many brown people die as long as Trump doesn't get his way.

I've been every bit as against Obama and Hillary's war mongering. I refused to vote for Hillary over it and didn't vote for Obama over it.

There are a small number of people with principles. A number of them here but we are the minority unfortunately.

So, Trump wants to draw down our military activities throughout the Middle East, works toward that goal, offers no response to many Iranian military activities, targets a singular man for his role in attacking Americans -- and you claim he's a warmonger.

And you expect to be taken seriously?

 

[daveman]

Prove America did that.

You don't bomb a hospital. You simply do not do that.

If there is a stock plie of weapons in it you sure as Hell do.

There wasn't and even then you do not do that.

The Law of Armed Conflict designates certain structures as having protected status...schools, hospitals, places of worship.

However, if combat activities are conducted from those structures, they lose their protected status and may be attacked.

Non-Western enemies love to attack from protected structures. The left takes their side when we legally attack those who attack us.

Combat activities were NOT being done out of the hospital.

You'll understand -- or not -- if I don't take your word for it.

 

[Deplorable Yankee]

According to the Daily Mail, Iran is implying threats to attack Trump-branded properties. Notice that this signals very clearly that unlike millions of dimwits in America, the Middle East clearly understands Trump is not acting in America’s interests and they are smart enough to signal “our beef is with Trump, not America.”

Two things are interesting about this move:

• Iran doesn’t actually have to fire a single weapon for this to be a very effective attack that hits Trump personally very hard.
• Remember that many of the “Trump properties” are actually nothing but licensing arrangements. Trump is not a “billionaire”. He is just a grifter who scams money here and there trading on his name.

Two questions:

• If you are a sane person with average intelligence, why would you book a room in any building that has the “Trump” name on the outside, knowing that this building might be in the crosshairs of a grenade attack or worse?
• If you are one of those geniuses who thought it was a good idea to sign a Trump branding agreement, how are you liking that arrangement now that you will be running at 30% occupancy?
• (Bonus question) If you are a traditional American ally (UK, Germany, France, Canada, Australia, etc) how are you liking the idea that there are buildings in your country that are now being cased by terrorists? How do you like the idea of having to spend millions of dollars on extra security to protect those buildings?

I predict the “Trump” name will be coming off a lot of buildings in the next 90 days.

S### gets real now. Trump properties targeted

Even if the Iranians don't succeed in launching attacks on Trump's buildings, the damage is done. No one in their right senses will put themselves in harms way by staying at any of his hotels or resorts.

 

[pknopp]

It's inevitable that at some time they will retaliate. We would do no less.

I've often thought that when that day comes they target the war mongers directly as opposed to the people in general.

Terrorists don't do that. They prefer to kill innocent, uninvolved people.

As we have done by the tens of thousands.

We did target a war monger. Y'all lost your shit about it.

You can stop pretending you hold the moral high ground. You don't care how many brown people die as long as Trump doesn't get his way.

I've been every bit as against Obama and Hillary's war mongering. I refused to vote for Hillary over it and didn't vote for Obama over it.

There are a small number of people with principles. A number of them here but we are the minority unfortunately.

So, Trump wants to draw down our military activities throughout the Middle East, works toward that goal, offers no response to many Iranian military activities, targets a singular man for his role in attacking Americans -- and you claim he's a warmonger.

And you expect to be taken seriously?

The Screeching Kettle: Trump has chosen to continue all 7 of the wars started under Bush and Obama

Iraq has asked us to leave. What was Trump's response? No, we are never leaving.

 

[pknopp]

You don't bomb a hospital. You simply do not do that.

If there is a stock plie of weapons in it you sure as Hell do.

There wasn't and even then you do not do that.

The Law of Armed Conflict designates certain structures as having protected status...schools, hospitals, places of worship.

However, if combat activities are conducted from those structures, they lose their protected status and may be attacked.

Non-Western enemies love to attack from protected structures. The left takes their side when we legally attack those who attack us.

Combat activities were NOT being done out of the hospital.

You'll understand -- or not -- if I don't take your word for it.

You don't have to. It's in the links I posted.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

According to the Daily Mail, Iran is implying threats to attack Trump-branded properties. Notice that this signals very clearly that unlike millions of dimwits in America, the Middle East clearly understands Trump is not acting in America’s interests and they are smart enough to signal “our beef is with Trump, not America.”

Two things are interesting about this move:

• Iran doesn’t actually have to fire a single weapon for this to be a very effective attack that hits Trump personally very hard.
• Remember that many of the “Trump properties” are actually nothing but licensing arrangements. Trump is not a “billionaire”. He is just a grifter who scams money here and there trading on his name.

Two questions:

• If you are a sane person with average intelligence, why would you book a room in any building that has the “Trump” name on the outside, knowing that this building might be in the crosshairs of a grenade attack or worse?
• If you are one of those geniuses who thought it was a good idea to sign a Trump branding agreement, how are you liking that arrangement now that you will be running at 30% occupancy?
• (Bonus question) If you are a traditional American ally (UK, Germany, France, Canada, Australia, etc) how are you liking the idea that there are buildings in your country that are now being cased by terrorists? How do you like the idea of having to spend millions of dollars on extra security to protect those buildings?

I predict the “Trump” name will be coming off a lot of buildings in the next 90 days.

S### gets real now. Trump properties targeted

Even if the Iranians don't succeed in launching attacks on Trump's buildings, the damage is done. No one in their right senses will put themselves in harms way by staying at any of his hotels or resorts.

lol,
Question: What is the definition of a Freudian slip?
Answer: a post by a white liberal claims/admits trump puts his own interests at risk and not his country in the war on terror.

 

[Zander]

According to the Daily Mail, Iran is implying threats to attack Trump-branded properties. Notice that this signals very clearly that unlike millions of dimwits in America, the Middle East clearly understands Trump is not acting in America’s interests and they are smart enough to signal “our beef is with Trump, not America.”

Two things are interesting about this move:

• Iran doesn’t actually have to fire a single weapon for this to be a very effective attack that hits Trump personally very hard.
• Remember that many of the “Trump properties” are actually nothing but licensing arrangements. Trump is not a “billionaire”. He is just a grifter who scams money here and there trading on his name.

Two questions:

• If you are a sane person with average intelligence, why would you book a room in any building that has the “Trump” name on the outside, knowing that this building might be in the crosshairs of a grenade attack or worse?
• If you are one of those geniuses who thought it was a good idea to sign a Trump branding agreement, how are you liking that arrangement now that you will be running at 30% occupancy?
• (Bonus question) If you are a traditional American ally (UK, Germany, France, Canada, Australia, etc) how are you liking the idea that there are buildings in your country that are now being cased by terrorists? How do you like the idea of having to spend millions of dollars on extra security to protect those buildings?

I predict the “Trump” name will be coming off a lot of buildings in the next 90 days.

S### gets real now. Trump properties targeted

Even if the Iranians don't succeed in launching attacks on Trump's buildings, the damage is done. No one in their right senses will put themselves in harms way by staying at any of his hotels or resorts.

Are you afraid of the boogey man too? Better stay home!

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

According to the Daily Mail, Iran is implying threats to attack Trump-branded properties. Notice that this signals very clearly that unlike millions of dimwits in America, the Middle East clearly understands Trump is not acting in America’s interests and they are smart enough to signal “our beef is with Trump, not America.”

Two things are interesting about this move:

• Iran doesn’t actually have to fire a single weapon for this to be a very effective attack that hits Trump personally very hard.
• Remember that many of the “Trump properties” are actually nothing but licensing arrangements. Trump is not a “billionaire”. He is just a grifter who scams money here and there trading on his name.

Two questions:

• If you are a sane person with average intelligence, why would you book a room in any building that has the “Trump” name on the outside, knowing that this building might be in the crosshairs of a grenade attack or worse?
• If you are one of those geniuses who thought it was a good idea to sign a Trump branding agreement, how are you liking that arrangement now that you will be running at 30% occupancy?
• (Bonus question) If you are a traditional American ally (UK, Germany, France, Canada, Australia, etc) how are you liking the idea that there are buildings in your country that are now being cased by terrorists? How do you like the idea of having to spend millions of dollars on extra security to protect those buildings?

I predict the “Trump” name will be coming off a lot of buildings in the next 90 days.

S### gets real now. Trump properties targeted

Even if the Iranians don't succeed in launching attacks on Trump's buildings, the damage is done. No one in their right senses will put themselves in harms way by staying at any of his hotels or resorts.

AOL home page has an article about it too.

People will be hurt possibly seriously and possibly fatally.

I sure hope that our tax dollars aren't being used for security for his properties. Especially the ones overseas and the ones he doesn't go to.

Yeah, Trump employees dont deserve protection. Just let them die, right?

Remember when CRC trumpanzees said that people aren't forced to work somewhere and can always leave and work elsewhere?

What a sick pathetic stupid response, as if every single employee of any Trump enterprise all vote the same.
Obviously you are willing to sacrifice American lives as long as it hurts Trump somehow.
That, clearly shows what a sociopath you are.

Yeah,
Who does he think he is, getting elected president? It will continue through his second term unfortunately.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

According to the Daily Mail, Iran is implying threats to attack Trump-branded properties. Notice that this signals very clearly that unlike millions of dimwits in America, the Middle East clearly understands Trump is not acting in America’s interests and they are smart enough to signal “our beef is with Trump, not America.”

Two things are interesting about this move:

• Iran doesn’t actually have to fire a single weapon for this to be a very effective attack that hits Trump personally very hard.
• Remember that many of the “Trump properties” are actually nothing but licensing arrangements. Trump is not a “billionaire”. He is just a grifter who scams money here and there trading on his name.

Two questions:

• If you are a sane person with average intelligence, why would you book a room in any building that has the “Trump” name on the outside, knowing that this building might be in the crosshairs of a grenade attack or worse?
• If you are one of those geniuses who thought it was a good idea to sign a Trump branding agreement, how are you liking that arrangement now that you will be running at 30% occupancy?
• (Bonus question) If you are a traditional American ally (UK, Germany, France, Canada, Australia, etc) how are you liking the idea that there are buildings in your country that are now being cased by terrorists? How do you like the idea of having to spend millions of dollars on extra security to protect those buildings?

I predict the “Trump” name will be coming off a lot of buildings in the next 90 days.

S### gets real now. Trump properties targeted

Even if the Iranians don't succeed in launching attacks on Trump's buildings, the damage is done. No one in their right senses will put themselves in harms way by staying at any of his hotels or resorts.

The ayatollahs must think that President Trump is mighty stupid. Everyone knows that Trump own Mar a Lago, and Doral and the Trump Tower. He isn't intimidating Trump at all. Further, Trump knows where this jackass lives, and has a lot surer way to get him that Khamenei has to get Trump.

They know he's stupid. So does everyone else. That is except a dimwit dotard supporter.

They don't have to do anything. Just the threat and fear is going to cost the Trump family millions in lost revenue.

And Trump won't be in office forever. Eventually, he and the crime family lose protection, and become soft targets. And the Iranians know where he lives to.

And since they're not targeting Americans at large, that isn't anybody else's problem. Is it.

Maybe the Clinton Foundation can help him out, like they did for the people of Haiti [emoji1122]?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

According to the Daily Mail, Iran is implying threats to attack Trump-branded properties. Notice that this signals very clearly that unlike millions of dimwits in America, the Middle East clearly understands Trump is not acting in America’s interests and they are smart enough to signal “our beef is with Trump, not America.”

Two things are interesting about this move:

• Iran doesn’t actually have to fire a single weapon for this to be a very effective attack that hits Trump personally very hard.
• Remember that many of the “Trump properties” are actually nothing but licensing arrangements. Trump is not a “billionaire”. He is just a grifter who scams money here and there trading on his name.

Two questions:

• If you are a sane person with average intelligence, why would you book a room in any building that has the “Trump” name on the outside, knowing that this building might be in the crosshairs of a grenade attack or worse?
• If you are one of those geniuses who thought it was a good idea to sign a Trump branding agreement, how are you liking that arrangement now that you will be running at 30% occupancy?
• (Bonus question) If you are a traditional American ally (UK, Germany, France, Canada, Australia, etc) how are you liking the idea that there are buildings in your country that are now being cased by terrorists? How do you like the idea of having to spend millions of dollars on extra security to protect those buildings?

I predict the “Trump” name will be coming off a lot of buildings in the next 90 days.

S### gets real now. Trump properties targeted

Even if the Iranians don't succeed in launching attacks on Trump's buildings, the damage is done. No one in their right senses will put themselves in harms way by staying at any of his hotels or resorts.

AOL home page has an article about it too.

People will be hurt possibly seriously and possibly fatally.

I sure hope that our tax dollars aren't being used for security for his properties. Especially the ones overseas and the ones he doesn't go to.

Yeah, Trump employees dont deserve protection. Just let them die, right?

trump employees are the responsibility of trump. Not us tax payers.

That is private property. Some of it is in other nations. We as tax payers have absolutely no obligation to provide security at those properties. Our obligation is to protect trump. If he's not there we don't need to protect anything.

Why doesn't trump care enough about his employees and guests to provide the proper security they deserve at his properties? Why do you and trump want them to die?

Maybe he can sponsor a Democrat convention at one of his exotic locations?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[daveman]

Terrorists don't do that. They prefer to kill innocent, uninvolved people.

As we have done by the tens of thousands.

We did target a war monger. Y'all lost your shit about it.

You can stop pretending you hold the moral high ground. You don't care how many brown people die as long as Trump doesn't get his way.

I've been every bit as against Obama and Hillary's war mongering. I refused to vote for Hillary over it and didn't vote for Obama over it.

There are a small number of people with principles. A number of them here but we are the minority unfortunately.

So, Trump wants to draw down our military activities throughout the Middle East, works toward that goal, offers no response to many Iranian military activities, targets a singular man for his role in attacking Americans -- and you claim he's a warmonger.

And you expect to be taken seriously?

The Screeching Kettle: Trump has chosen to continue all 7 of the wars started under Bush and Obama

Iraq has asked us to leave. What was Trump's response? No, we are never leaving.

Okay.