Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Since you can't come up with any evidence of widespread voter fraud then every effort to stop widespread voter fraud is completely ridiculous.Why do Conservatives always assume that because there isn't any evidence of widespread voter fraud that this somehow justifies the need for Voter ID laws to stop widespread non-existent voter fraud?
Why do liberals always assume you have some sort of Constitutional right to vote? States determine your voting qualifications and any requirements aside from those things spelled out in amendments that can not be used to disqualify a person from voting. If a state wants to ensure the quality of the vote and safeguard against any possible fraud, that is their right as long as they don't violate the Constitution.
Perhaps Miguel de Cervantes can be the 2016 GOPbagger nominee.
Jimmy Carter's grandson: People have right to sport Confederate battle flag license plate - Washington Times
White democrats backing the confederate flag?
I Thought they all switched to the republican party?
pan·der
ˈpandər
verb
gerund or present participle: pandering
1.
gratify or indulge (an immoral or distasteful desire, need, or habit or a person with such a desire, etc.).
so you support the dems then completely whitewash all their activities and blame republicans for racism, you crack me up. You really have no clue do you?
No First where is your evidence that the Southern Strategy doesnt or never existed. You've said it a number of times and the best you got is one sentence saying its a falsehood.
Last point, you've offered no defense to Republican racism only saying that they cant be racist because Dems didnt do something. That doesnt change what republicans are. For example the Dems do everything you ask of them then viola Republican history of racism goes away.
NOT!
Ok, so what do republicans do that is racist? Not care about the confederate flag? not care about people calling each other names?
or is it being against social welfare programs? ahhhhh....I bet we have a winner! But do tell
Once we establish current racism, I'd love to get into the southern strategy, but you still haven't told me what it is?
No First where is your evidence that the Southern Strategy doesnt or never existed. You've said it a number of times and the best you got is one sentence saying its a falsehood.
Last point, you've offered no defense to Republican racism only saying that they cant be racist because Dems didnt do something. That doesnt change what republicans are. For example the Dems do everything you ask of them then viola Republican history of racism goes away.
NOT!
Ok, so what do republicans do that is racist? Not care about the confederate flag? not care about people calling each other names?
or is it being against social welfare programs? ahhhhh....I bet we have a winner! But do tell
Once we establish current racism, I'd love to get into the southern strategy, but you still haven't told me what it is?
Oh go fuck yourself...We've been over this and everytime you pull this amnesia act and ask for a list. You said the Southern Strategy was false (or something) and 3 posts later you offer nothing but more goal post moving.
Please, stupid racist neo-Confederate assholes, sport your failed rebellion flag on your car so I know which tires to slash.
"Of that time"? Like the South ever stopped being racist?Only really stupid idiots try to judge people of that time by today's standards. You seem to fit that to a T.The Confederacy fought specifically to retain ownership of black people. That is as racist as you can get.
It took how many decades for black people to be able to vote?
Why accept any what? Voter fraud? We don't. That's why there were laws set up to stop that type of thing. Those laws worked to a point where no one can cite any legitimate examples of widespread voter fraud. So if voter fraud isn't a problem then why do you need more big government laws to prevent it?Why do Conservatives always assume that because there isn't any evidence of widespread voter fraud that this somehow justifies the need for Voter ID laws to stop widespread non-existent voter fraud?
But why accept any at all?
If the photo IDs are free and easily available, what's the problem?
I have a bigger problem with eliminating early voting. IDs? I don't see the problem.
Also, the photo IDs are not going to be free or easily available. If that were the case, a driver's license would be enough. But this isn't about stopping voter fraud, it's about stopping voter participation.
Please, stupid racist neo-Confederate assholes, sport your failed rebellion flag on your car so I know which tires to slash.
Why accept any what? Voter fraud? We don't. That's why there were laws set up to stop that type of thing. Those laws worked to a point where no one can cite any legitimate examples of widespread voter fraud. So if voter fraud isn't a problem then why do you need more big government laws to prevent it?But why accept any at all?
If the photo IDs are free and easily available, what's the problem?
I have a bigger problem with eliminating early voting. IDs? I don't see the problem.
Also, the photo IDs are not going to be free or easily available. If that were the case, a driver's license would be enough. But this isn't about stopping voter fraud, it's about stopping voter participation.
Voter fraud never happens.
Over 40,000 voters are registered in both Virginia and Maryland, group finds
Over 40,000 voters are registered in both Virginia and Maryland, group finds | Fox News
Oct. 13) -- Federal, state, and local officials are gathering information about allegations of voter registration fraud that were first raised Channel 8 Eyewitness News.
An employee of a private voter registration firm alleges that his bosses trashed registration forms filled out by Democratic voters because they only wanted to sign up Republican voters.
The allegations have set off a political firestorm stretching from Las Vegas to Washington D.C., and beyond.
An effort by Republicans to register voters with paid workers is underway in North Carolina and across the nation. In the past month various ads have appeared on Craigslist, Facebook and other online job listings offering amounts from $11 to $13 per hour (and in some cases internship credit) to help Republicans and Mitt Romney win in North Carolina in November by identifying conservatives and registering them as voters. The operation is linked to an Arizona company with a history of fraud allegations including the destruction of Democratic registration cards.
The operation appears to be run by a company called Strategic Allied Consulting, LLC, on behalf of the NC Republican Party. Campaign filings with the Federal Election Commission show that the NC Republican Party federal fund paid $333,267.50 to Strategic Allied Consulting in July. The company was set up in Virginia in June 2012 and filings with the Virginia Secretary of State reveal no identifying information other than that of a corporate filing service.
If youre a woman in Texas, getting married or divorced could cost you your vote, especially if you drive too. In fact, Republicans are counting on it.
Under Texas new voter ID law, Women who were married or divorced will have to update their voter ID to match their current legal name.
It means first, middle and surname on your voter ID must be your current legal name and must match with your voter registration card exactly. This is serious stuff. Some estimates suggest this law affects 34% of eligible women voters. It is complicated, as a Texas judge found out the hard way
The reduction in the number of days allowed for early voting is particularly important because early voting plays a major role in Obamas ground game. The Democrats carried most states that allow many days of early voting, and Obamas national field director admitted, shortly before last years election, that early voting is giving us a solid lead in the battleground states that will decide this election.
Pennsylvanias GOP chairman, Rob Gleason, is pleased with how effective Voter ID laws were in the 2012 election. Despite President Obamas victory, Gleason believes the laws did what they were designed to do: suppress the Democratic vote.
When asked by a Pennsylvania cable news reporter earlier this week if the laws affected last years elections, Gleason responded: I think we had a better election. Think about this: we cut Obama by 5 percent I think Voter ID helped a bit in that.
Why accept any what? Voter fraud? We don't. That's why there were laws set up to stop that type of thing. Those laws worked to a point where no one can cite any legitimate examples of widespread voter fraud. So if voter fraud isn't a problem then why do you need more big government laws to prevent it?
Also, the photo IDs are not going to be free or easily available. If that were the case, a driver's license would be enough. But this isn't about stopping voter fraud, it's about stopping voter participation.
Voter fraud never happens.
Over 40,000 voters are registered in both Virginia and Maryland, group finds
Over 40,000 voters are registered in both Virginia and Maryland, group finds | Fox News
the fraud is not who is registered (since the voter can't always control when rosters are cleaned) it is WHERE THEY VOTE?
until you prove anyone voted twice, there is no VOTER FRAUD
(except for things like this, of course..... ):
Investigation into Trashed Voter Registrations - 8 News NOW
and this:
http://www.bluenc.com/republican-paid-voter-registration-operation-linked-fraud
and, of course, this:
Texas Voter ID Law Prevents Women from Voting while Married
The reduction in the number of days allowed for early voting is particularly important because early voting plays a major role in Obamas ground game. The Democrats carried most states that allow many days of early voting, and Obamas national field director admitted, shortly before last years election, that early voting is giving us a solid lead in the battleground states that will decide this election.
Republicans Admit Voter ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters - The Daily Beast
and let's not forget the Pennsylvania republican who talked about how voter id cut the president's lead in that state:
Pennsylvanias GOP chairman, Rob Gleason, is pleased with how effective Voter ID laws were in the 2012 election. Despite President Obamas victory, Gleason believes the laws did what they were designed to do: suppress the Democratic vote.
When asked by a Pennsylvania cable news reporter earlier this week if the laws affected last years elections, Gleason responded: I think we had a better election. Think about this: we cut Obama by 5 percent I think Voter ID helped a bit in that.
Pennsylvania GOP Chief Admits Voter ID Laws Suppressed Democratic Vote In 2012 - The National Memo
so what were you whining about again?
Voter fraud never happens.
Over 40,000 voters are registered in both Virginia and Maryland, group finds
Over 40,000 voters are registered in both Virginia and Maryland, group finds | Fox News
the fraud is not who is registered (since the voter can't always control when rosters are cleaned) it is WHERE THEY VOTE?
until you prove anyone voted twice, there is no VOTER FRAUD
(except for things like this, of course..... ):
Investigation into Trashed Voter Registrations - 8 News NOW
and this:
http://www.bluenc.com/republican-paid-voter-registration-operation-linked-fraud
and, of course, this:
Texas Voter ID Law Prevents Women from Voting while Married
Republicans Admit Voter ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters - The Daily Beast
and let's not forget the Pennsylvania republican who talked about how voter id cut the president's lead in that state:
Pennsylvanias GOP chairman, Rob Gleason, is pleased with how effective Voter ID laws were in the 2012 election. Despite President Obamas victory, Gleason believes the laws did what they were designed to do: suppress the Democratic vote.
When asked by a Pennsylvania cable news reporter earlier this week if the laws affected last years elections, Gleason responded: I think we had a better election. Think about this: we cut Obama by 5 percent I think Voter ID helped a bit in that.
Pennsylvania GOP Chief Admits Voter ID Laws Suppressed Democratic Vote In 2012 - The National Memo
so what were you whining about again?
Or this:
"Former Ohio poll worker Melowese Richardson, who was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison for voter fraud, was released early because she has bi-polar disorder.
Richardson, who was trusted with the position of "being a guardian to free elections," admitted to illegally voting in 2009, 2011 and 2012. At her trial, Richardson claims she had no intent to commit voter fraud even though she had cast multiple votes for President Obama at her Hamilton County polling place. Her infractions included voting in person at the poll while also sending in an absentee ballot. Moreover, Melowese had voted on behalf of her sister who is in a coma, her brother, and her grandchild."
the fraud is not who is registered (since the voter can't always control when rosters are cleaned) it is WHERE THEY VOTE?
until you prove anyone voted twice, there is no VOTER FRAUD
(except for things like this, of course..... ):
Investigation into Trashed Voter Registrations - 8 News NOW
and this:
http://www.bluenc.com/republican-paid-voter-registration-operation-linked-fraud
and, of course, this:
Texas Voter ID Law Prevents Women from Voting while Married
Republicans Admit Voter ID Laws Are Aimed at Democratic Voters - The Daily Beast
and let's not forget the Pennsylvania republican who talked about how voter id cut the president's lead in that state:
Pennsylvania GOP Chief Admits Voter ID Laws Suppressed Democratic Vote In 2012 - The National Memo
so what were you whining about again?
Or this:
"Former Ohio poll worker Melowese Richardson, who was convicted and sentenced to five years in prison for voter fraud, was released early because she has bi-polar disorder.
Richardson, who was trusted with the position of "being a guardian to free elections," admitted to illegally voting in 2009, 2011 and 2012. At her trial, Richardson claims she had no intent to commit voter fraud even though she had cast multiple votes for President Obama at her Hamilton County polling place. Her infractions included voting in person at the poll while also sending in an absentee ballot. Moreover, Melowese had voted on behalf of her sister who is in a coma, her brother, and her grandchild."
so she voted multiple times in the same election, whats the excuse mow liberals?
