PROJECTIONHow about you fuck off and get some evidence...
You look like a guy sitting there wanking off using you imagination...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
PROJECTIONHow about you fuck off and get some evidence...
You look like a guy sitting there wanking off using you imagination...
Go to hell. Whole world knows you are lying Sacks.How about you fuck off and get some evidence...
You look like a guy sitting there wanking off using you imagination...
There is no way the SCOTUS is going to let what Trump did as a part of a Presidents roles..
They could slow ball it but they are not letting future Presidents rig an Elections...
You fuckers always confuse Trump for Biden.
Yeah the Big Guy. Money Laundeter N Chief. And lets put a top secret server in bathroom Clinton
Trump had the opportunity to prosecute Hillary (and should have) but did nothing.
As a first world country we were always above that.
Although President Trump surely wanted to.
We have lost our 1st world status at this point.
We are a 2nd world country who does prosecute our political opponents while borrowing ourselves into 3rd world status trying to buy the outcomes that we want all over the planet.
Sounds like you need a good cry. Then you can try to convince me that a perfectly legitimate replacement of a Justice on the Supreme Court, done constitutionally, with the advice and consent of the Senate, complete with open hearings and everything above board is somehow equivalent to a petty, petulant president simply adding Justices of his own pick until he gets the results he wants. Good luck with that, and good luck trying to maintain the legitimacy of the Court while doing it. Here's a clue, you won't, and that's one BIG reason why presidents and the Senate don't just add Justices every time a new president takes office.Oops, sorry, nobody asked you if you like it. And they don't have to ask you.
Just like nobody asked me if it was okay to replace, weeks before an election, the champion of women's rights for decades on the court with a religious nutsack whose title in her cult is literally, "Handmaiden".
Let's get a beer and cry together.
I threw up a little reading that.
Why?
That certainly is how TRUMP thinks and largely why he did what he didJustice Alito suggests that, if former presidents are subject to prosecution after leaving office, they'll be more likely to seek to unlawfully remain in office after they were defeated for re-election/their term has ended.
That certainly is how TRUMP thinks and largely why he did what he did
I keep telling you, those foil helmets really don't give you mind-reading powers, but here we are...That certainly is how TRUMP thinks and largely why he did what he did
Well of course not. He and his nepo babies were using personal email servers and unsecured cell phones.Trump had the opportunity to prosecute Hillary (and should have) but did nothing.
Uh , no, you are the one crying up a little storm at the perfectly legal suggestion of expanding the court.Sounds like you need a good cry.
It is too late for that an election was already stolen.There is no way the SCOTUS is going to let what Trump did as a part of a Presidents roles..
They could slow ball it but they are not letting future Presidents rig an Elections...
Well, in order for any of this to approach reality, they have to be true. One, I've explicitly said repeatedly that it is legal to expand the court. It's also wrong-headed, democrat party level stupid, and would rebound immediately to the democrats' detriment, but it's legal.Uh , no, you are the one crying up a little storm at the perfectly legal suggestion of expanding the court.
Which laws or rules were broken that you think were, and why did you not send your information to the proper authorities?Right after insisting McConnell broke no rules or laws, so everyone should stop complaining.
I'm sure you enjoy your imagination quite a lot, but you have yet to even attempt explaining how Quid Pro cravenly expanding the court solely to get the rulings he wants in any way equates to TRUMP! duly replacing Justices lost to death, with the advice and consent of the Senate. And yes, I am enjoying watching you try to come up with some plausible excuse to think such democrat-level stupid things. Name the rule and/or the law that was broken.And I am enjoying every second of it.
Duplicity on parade.