She knew all along....

[SassyIrishLass]

 

[HappyJoy]

[


The Sudanese offered to hand over Bin Laden but Clinton declined so dont even go there.
And maybe you should be worrying about your own problems with your muslim "immigrants".....a problem that hilary and the messiah are intent on bringing to America.
So excuse me if I dont follow in the footsteps of your failures.

I didn't vote for any of the Clintons, and I'm not convinced they are good for the Democratic Party. I don't like their allegiance to Wall Street. Pay attention.

Your factoid about Bin Laden and the Sudanese has some awfully large qualifications and complications that you failed to report.

Click me for the full story on the Sudanese and Bin Laden > Clinton Passed on Killing bin Laden?

Stop distorting the truth.

Again: if you want us to take you seriously when you try to frame your enemies for crimes, you need to prove you're not merely a partisan hack. You need to prove that you hold both sides accountable for the mistakes regarding American lives, Bin Laden, etc.

Hold both sides responsible? Like you did in blaming Bush?
Why didnt Clinton take a stronger stance against terrorism after the world trade center bombings and the myriad of other attacks leading up to 9/11?

You're nothing but a hack.

And we move the goal posts. Why don't you respond to the link provided?

He/she is the one who took us down this path not me.
How about he/she stays on topic instead of bringing up Booooooosh!!!

I'm not concerned with who brought Bush into the argument. Someone presented a source that calls into question a point in your post about Clinton not getting Bin laden, you ignored it.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

[


The Sudanese offered to hand over Bin Laden but Clinton declined so dont even go there.
And maybe you should be worrying about your own problems with your muslim "immigrants".....a problem that hilary and the messiah are intent on bringing to America.
So excuse me if I dont follow in the footsteps of your failures.

I didn't vote for any of the Clintons, and I'm not convinced they are good for the Democratic Party. I don't like their allegiance to Wall Street. Pay attention.

Your factoid about Bin Laden and the Sudanese has some awfully large qualifications and complications that you failed to report.

Click me for the full story on the Sudanese and Bin Laden > Clinton Passed on Killing bin Laden?

Stop distorting the truth.

Again: if you want us to take you seriously when you try to frame your enemies for crimes, you need to prove you're not merely a partisan hack. You need to prove that you hold both sides accountable for the mistakes regarding American lives, Bin Laden, etc.

Hold both sides responsible? Like you did in blaming Bush?
Why didnt Clinton take a stronger stance against terrorism after the world trade center bombings and the myriad of other attacks leading up to 9/11?

You're nothing but a hack.

And we move the goal posts. Why don't you respond to the link provided?

He/she is the one who took us down this path not me.
How about he/she stays on topic instead of bringing up Booooooosh!!!

I'm not concerned with who brought Bush into the argument. Someone presented a source that calls into question a point in your post about Clinton not getting Bin laden, you ignored it.

You think I dont know the particulars?
They offered up Bin Laden,Clinton declined.
Thats as valid as the bullshit I was responding to.

 

[HappyJoy]

I didn't vote for any of the Clintons, and I'm not convinced they are good for the Democratic Party. I don't like their allegiance to Wall Street. Pay attention.

Your factoid about Bin Laden and the Sudanese has some awfully large qualifications and complications that you failed to report.

Click me for the full story on the Sudanese and Bin Laden > Clinton Passed on Killing bin Laden?

Stop distorting the truth.

Again: if you want us to take you seriously when you try to frame your enemies for crimes, you need to prove you're not merely a partisan hack. You need to prove that you hold both sides accountable for the mistakes regarding American lives, Bin Laden, etc.

Hold both sides responsible? Like you did in blaming Bush?
Why didnt Clinton take a stronger stance against terrorism after the world trade center bombings and the myriad of other attacks leading up to 9/11?

You're nothing but a hack.

And we move the goal posts. Why don't you respond to the link provided?

He/she is the one who took us down this path not me.
How about he/she stays on topic instead of bringing up Booooooosh!!!

I'm not concerned with who brought Bush into the argument. Someone presented a source that calls into question a point in your post about Clinton not getting Bin laden, you ignored it.

You think I dont know the particulars?
They offered up Bin Laden,Clinton declined.
Thats as valid as the bullshit I was responding to.

See, what you should do is ask the poster to do more than post a link, that way you and I don't have to pretend that you read it.

 

[kiwiman127]

The saddest thing about this entire thing is that the Republicans have spent all this time using 4 dead Americans as tools.

What's sadder is you idiot loons could care less about four dead Americans, just keep protecting the one that got them killed. That's pathetic

Considering 72% of the American people think this Benghazi 17 month investigation is a political witch hunt, it's not just the left that sees the GOP is using those who were killed at Benghazi as political tools.
2016 is going to be real interesting.

Bleh, stop kissing the old fat hag's ass

I have stated on USMB, that I have no intention of voting for anyone who is running for president. They are either too far to the right or too far to the left.
I'm just calling a spade a spade in regards the usage of four dead Americans to satisfy any political gain and satisfy their hate.
It's quite despicable.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The saddest thing about this entire thing is that the Republicans have spent all this time using 4 dead Americans as tools.

What's sadder is you idiot loons could care less about four dead Americans, just keep protecting the one that got them killed. That's pathetic

Considering 72% of the American people think this Benghazi 17 month investigation is a political witch hunt, it's not just the left that sees the GOP is using those who were killed at Benghazi as political tools.
2016 is going to be real interesting.

Bleh, stop kissing the old fat hag's ass

I have stated on USMB, that I have no intention of voting for anyone who is running for president. They are either too far to the right or too far to the left.
I'm just calling a spade a spade in regards the usage of four dead Americans to satisfy any political gain and satisfy their hate.
It's quite despicable.

What is despicable is four dead Americans were left hung out to dry by their country....the fat ass hag is responsible. That's just a fact

 

[koshergrl]

And how exactly is that taking responsibility for the death of four Americans?

You might be right about Clinton. I'm not convinced Bill'ary is good for the Democratic Party, especially after capitulating with Wall Street against Labor/Unions in the 90s.

But here is the problem. Your desire to stop the Clinton's at any cost makes it hard for people to accept your version of the facts. Your party has an overlapping set of institutions - think tanks, print and digital media, political action committees named "Stop Hillary", etc. These institutions provide incentives to anyone who produces information that harms Hillary. They and you are literally at war.

In your defense. It is very obvious to an outside observer that you deeply believe Hillary is evil, and that you are morally obligated and psychologically compelled to say whatever is necessary to keep her from winning the presidency and, thus, stop her from destroying your country. I have no doubt that you believe Hillary lies about everything. I'm inclined to agree with you here. I think that, like any politician, she puts a spin on nearly everything in order to make herself look better, and she could have easily made terrible mistakes, ethical and otherwise, while Secretary of State. So I wouldn't be surprised if some of your suspicions are true. But your party's willingness to distort and invent facts to stop her makes it impossible to take you seriously. Your desire to destroy Hillary at all costs is too transparent. And, like I said, I don't think you are destroying her because you are evil. I think you are acting out of fear over the fate of your country.

But there is a deeper complication that I can't square.

If you cared about American lives, you would have raised a concern when George Bush ignored a August 2001 memo warning of an impending attack using planes & skyscrapers. Your leading presidential candidate says that Bush acted with terrible negligence in his handling of the Iraq War. Do you know what happened because of that negligence which Trump asserts? 5,000+ dead Americans - yet your side asked for no investigation. Don't you at least want to find out what happened with our 9/11 preparedness? After being warned of an impending terrorist attack using planes and skyscrapers, why didn't we have scramble ready planes to meet the planes after they went off course? This is inexcusable and it makes Clinton's alleged errors look like nothing. And what about the intelligence surrounding the resulting Iraq War? And what about the execution of the war itself? Why didn't you - in your concern for American lives - ask for any investigations . . . so that we could learn from the experience and improve our methods for the next crisis?

Point is: you never - and I mean never - take action against a sitting Republican president or high ranking Republican official. So we know that you are just a partisan who is doing everything possible to help your party win. You are a political actor and not a truth teller. You are a deeply partisan hack who is doing all he can to stop Hillary.

You think Nixon would have left office if Repubs hadn't demanded that he do so? Don't insult us with your rants if you don't know what you're talking about. Or are you just a liar?

 

[HappyJoy]

The saddest thing about this entire thing is that the Republicans have spent all this time using 4 dead Americans as tools.

What's sadder is you idiot loons could care less about four dead Americans, just keep protecting the one that got them killed. That's pathetic

Considering 72% of the American people think this Benghazi 17 month investigation is a political witch hunt, it's not just the left that sees the GOP is using those who were killed at Benghazi as political tools.
2016 is going to be real interesting.

Bleh, stop kissing the old fat hag's ass

I have stated on USMB, that I have no intention of voting for anyone who is running for president. They are either too far to the right or too far to the left.
I'm just calling a spade a spade in regards the usage of four dead Americans to satisfy any political gain and satisfy their hate.
It's quite despicable.

What is despicable is four dead Americans were left hung out to dry by their country....the fat ass hag is responsible. That's just a fact

No, it's not a fact.

 

[Avatar4321]

and the hearing was invaluable for the clarity it provided.

"Here’s what the Benghazi committee found in Thursday’s hearing. Two hours into Mrs. Clinton’s testimony, Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan referred to an email Mrs. Clinton sent to her daughter, Chelsea, at 11:12 the night of the attack, or 45 minutes after the secretary of state had issued a statement blaming YouTube-inflamed mobs."

"That same evening, Mrs. Clinton spoke on the phone with Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf, around 8 p.m. The notes from that conversation, in a State Department email, describe her as saying: “We have asked for the Libyan government to provide additional security to the compound immediately as there is a gun battle ongoing, which I understand Ansar as Sharia [sic] is claiming responsibility for.” Ansar al Sharia is al Qaeda’s affiliate on the Arabian Peninsula. So several hours into the attack, Mrs. Clinton already believed that al Qaeda was attacking U.S. facilities."

"The next afternoon, Mrs. Clinton had a call with the Egyptian Prime Minister Hesham Kandil. The notes from it are absolutely damning. The secretary of state tells him: “We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack—not a protest.” And yet Mrs. Clinton, and Ms. Rice and Mr. Obama for days and days continued to spin the video lie."

She Knew All Along

so what? She told the committee she took responsibility for Benghazi. Whats so damn difficult to understand?

how damn dumb are RW's ?

If she took responsibility for it she wouldn't be seeking a promotion

 

[koshergrl]

The saddest thing about this entire thing is that the Republicans have spent all this time using 4 dead Americans as tools.

What's sadder is you idiot loons could care less about four dead Americans, just keep protecting the one that got them killed. That's pathetic

Considering 72% of the American people think this Benghazi 17 month investigation is a political witch hunt, it's not just the left that sees the GOP is using those who were killed at Benghazi as political tools.
2016 is going to be real interesting.

Bleh, stop kissing the old fat hag's ass

I have stated on USMB, that I have no intention of voting for anyone who is running for president. They are either too far to the right or too far to the left.
I'm just calling a spade a spade in regards the usage of four dead Americans to satisfy any political gain and satisfy their hate.
It's quite despicable.

You're a foreigner...that makes you a preferred voter these days. You can probably legally vote as many times as you like....as long as you vote Clinton.

 

[HappyJoy]

And how exactly is that taking responsibility for the death of four Americans?

You might be right about Clinton. I'm not convinced Bill'ary is good for the Democratic Party, especially after capitulating with Wall Street against Labor/Unions in the 90s.

But here is the problem. Your desire to stop the Clinton's at any cost makes it hard for people to accept your version of the facts. Your party has an overlapping set of institutions - think tanks, print and digital media, political action committees named "Stop Hillary", etc. These institutions provide incentives to anyone who produces information that harms Hillary. They and you are literally at war.

In your defense. It is very obvious to an outside observer that you deeply believe Hillary is evil, and that you are morally obligated and psychologically compelled to say whatever is necessary to keep her from winning the presidency and, thus, stop her from destroying your country. I have no doubt that you believe Hillary lies about everything. I'm inclined to agree with you here. I think that, like any politician, she puts a spin on nearly everything in order to make herself look better, and she could have easily made terrible mistakes, ethical and otherwise, while Secretary of State. So I wouldn't be surprised if some of your suspicions are true. But your party's willingness to distort and invent facts to stop her makes it impossible to take you seriously. Your desire to destroy Hillary at all costs is too transparent. And, like I said, I don't think you are destroying her because you are evil. I think you are acting out of fear over the fate of your country.

But there is a deeper complication that I can't square.

If you cared about American lives, you would have raised a concern when George Bush ignored a August 2001 memo warning of an impending attack using planes & skyscrapers. Your leading presidential candidate says that Bush acted with terrible negligence in his handling of the Iraq War. Do you know what happened because of that negligence which Trump asserts? 5,000+ dead Americans - yet your side asked for no investigation. Don't you at least want to find out what happened with our 9/11 preparedness? After being warned of an impending terrorist attack using planes and skyscrapers, why didn't we have scramble ready planes to meet the planes after they went off course? This is inexcusable and it makes Clinton's alleged errors look like nothing. And what about the intelligence surrounding the resulting Iraq War? And what about the execution of the war itself? Why didn't you - in your concern for American lives - ask for any investigations . . . so that we could learn from the experience and improve our methods for the next crisis?

Point is: you never - and I mean never - take action against a sitting Republican president or high ranking Republican official. So we know that you are just a partisan who is doing everything possible to help your party win. You are a political actor and not a truth teller. You are a deeply partisan hack who is doing all he can to stop Hillary.

You think Nixon would have left office if Repubs hadn't demanded that he do so? Don't insult us with your rants if you don't know what you're talking about. Or are you just a liar?

After Nixon was completely disgraced? Did he have a choice? Thankfully he had his day in court and spent a couple years in prison because the next Republican President totally didn't pardon him.

Good thing he didn't commit the ultimate sin of lying about a blowjob.

 

[HappyJoy]

The saddest thing about this entire thing is that the Republicans have spent all this time using 4 dead Americans as tools.

What's sadder is you idiot loons could care less about four dead Americans, just keep protecting the one that got them killed. That's pathetic

Considering 72% of the American people think this Benghazi 17 month investigation is a political witch hunt, it's not just the left that sees the GOP is using those who were killed at Benghazi as political tools.
2016 is going to be real interesting.

Bleh, stop kissing the old fat hag's ass

I have stated on USMB, that I have no intention of voting for anyone who is running for president. They are either too far to the right or too far to the left.
I'm just calling a spade a spade in regards the usage of four dead Americans to satisfy any political gain and satisfy their hate.
It's quite despicable.

You're a foreigner...that makes you a preferred voter these days. You can probably legally vote as many times as you like....as long as you vote Clinton.

Sad thing is you probably believe what you posted.

 

[koshergrl]

What's sadder is you idiot loons could care less about four dead Americans, just keep protecting the one that got them killed. That's pathetic

Considering 72% of the American people think this Benghazi 17 month investigation is a political witch hunt, it's not just the left that sees the GOP is using those who were killed at Benghazi as political tools.
2016 is going to be real interesting.

Bleh, stop kissing the old fat hag's ass

I have stated on USMB, that I have no intention of voting for anyone who is running for president. They are either too far to the right or too far to the left.
I'm just calling a spade a spade in regards the usage of four dead Americans to satisfy any political gain and satisfy their hate.
It's quite despicable.

You're a foreigner...that makes you a preferred voter these days. You can probably legally vote as many times as you like....as long as you vote Clinton.

Sad thing is you probably believe what you posted.

Sad thing is, it's pretty true.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

What's sadder is you idiot loons could care less about four dead Americans, just keep protecting the one that got them killed. That's pathetic

Considering 72% of the American people think this Benghazi 17 month investigation is a political witch hunt, it's not just the left that sees the GOP is using those who were killed at Benghazi as political tools.
2016 is going to be real interesting.

Bleh, stop kissing the old fat hag's ass

I have stated on USMB, that I have no intention of voting for anyone who is running for president. They are either too far to the right or too far to the left.
I'm just calling a spade a spade in regards the usage of four dead Americans to satisfy any political gain and satisfy their hate.
It's quite despicable.

You're a foreigner...that makes you a preferred voter these days. You can probably legally vote as many times as you like....as long as you vote Clinton.

Sad thing is you probably believe what you posted.

What's sadder is you idiot loons could care less about four dead Americans, just keep protecting the one that got them killed. That's pathetic

Considering 72% of the American people think this Benghazi 17 month investigation is a political witch hunt, it's not just the left that sees the GOP is using those who were killed at Benghazi as political tools.
2016 is going to be real interesting.

Bleh, stop kissing the old fat hag's ass

I have stated on USMB, that I have no intention of voting for anyone who is running for president. They are either too far to the right or too far to the left.
I'm just calling a spade a spade in regards the usage of four dead Americans to satisfy any political gain and satisfy their hate.
It's quite despicable.

What is despicable is four dead Americans were left hung out to dry by their country....the fat ass hag is responsible. That's just a fact

No, it's not a fact.

yeah it's a fact, dip shit.

 

[koshergrl]

Don't kid yourself, republican voters only care about those issue as it relates to democrat infractions. The Benghazi investigation charade is being conducted for your benefit and i haven't seen any one of you on the right calling for the focus of the investigation to change.

what exactly was the purpose of the watergate investigation? was it a partisan witch hunt over a minor break in where no one was killed? A president resigned over that very insignificant issue because he lied about it to the american people. the benghazi lies directly caused the deaths of 4 americans and you libs don't give a shit. pathetic.

and for the record, republicans did not support nixon, they had principles.

Name one alleged lie that happened before the attack that contributed in any way to the deaths.

So like all lefties, you're okay with lying unless it gets someone killed...and even then it's okay if they say they did it for the good of all.

You realize that all murderous regimes, and the crafters of Obama are, depend heavily on your stupidity, right?

is that a sentence?

My phone thought so hahaha

 

[Manonthestreet]

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Boo hoo the mean conservatives are picking on poor Hillary, don't tell me if she wins we have to listen to this BS like we had to over Obungles

 

[Care4all]

and the hearing was invaluable for the clarity it provided.

"Here’s what the Benghazi committee found in Thursday’s hearing. Two hours into Mrs. Clinton’s testimony, Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan referred to an email Mrs. Clinton sent to her daughter, Chelsea, at 11:12 the night of the attack, or 45 minutes after the secretary of state had issued a statement blaming YouTube-inflamed mobs."

"That same evening, Mrs. Clinton spoke on the phone with Libyan President Mohamed Magariaf, around 8 p.m. The notes from that conversation, in a State Department email, describe her as saying: “We have asked for the Libyan government to provide additional security to the compound immediately as there is a gun battle ongoing, which I understand Ansar as Sharia [sic] is claiming responsibility for.” Ansar al Sharia is al Qaeda’s affiliate on the Arabian Peninsula. So several hours into the attack, Mrs. Clinton already believed that al Qaeda was attacking U.S. facilities."

"The next afternoon, Mrs. Clinton had a call with the Egyptian Prime Minister Hesham Kandil. The notes from it are absolutely damning. The secretary of state tells him: “We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack—not a protest.” And yet Mrs. Clinton, and Ms. Rice and Mr. Obama for days and days continued to spin the video lie."

She Knew All Along

Actually NO she did not KNOW for certain all along... no one did....

at the time she spoke to Chelsea and the foreign Presidents, a terrorist group had taken credit for it....

thus her messages as they were.

but the following day, the alqaeda type wanna be group, reneged their claim, they retracted it....and said they did not do it.


CLINTON: Well, Congressman, there was a lot of conflicting information that we were trying to make sense of. The situation was very fluid. It was fast-moving. There was also a claim of responsibility by Ansar al-Sharia. And when I talked to the Egyptian prime minister, I said that this was a claim of responsibility by Ansar al-Sharia, by a group that was affiliated -- or at least wanted to be affiliated -- with Al Qaida.

Sometime after that, the next -- next day, early the next morning after that, on the 12th or 13th, they retracted their claim of responsibility.

Rep. Jim Jordan vs. Hillary Clinton: Why Did You Tell Egyptians Benghazi Was a Terrorist Attack But Not The American People?

Hillary’s Unconscionable Benghazi Lie, by Mona Charen, National Review

of course dear Mona Charen would spin it the way she did, without providing a single link to substantiate her opinion...

And yes, the videos released in the ME from the Obama administration regarding the Mohamed bashing video were necessary, unlike Mona dearest, they don't operate in a vacuum...all of this civil unrest on the video in the middle east was going on at the same time period, and they needed to calm the region so our other Americans working in the middle east were not hurt. Why was Mona even questioning that???

Does she really expect our government to spill the beans on everything their intelligence thinks they know on World wide CNN? Seriously???

gawd almighty, she's a partisan hack....trying to spin a story without the real pertinent facts.

What difference does 1+week make, on us knowing everything, other than top secret, confidential information?

This is all based on the CRAZY idea that 1 week would have mattered in the election and Romney would have won theory if the public knew 1 week earlier that is was done by some alqaeda wanna be group? It was still 2 months before the election?

this is simply partisan bullcrud that makes no sense, and HAS NOTHING to do with the attack itself or the dead, NADA, NIENTE, ZILCH, ZIP.

RNC/GOP, needs to pay us tax payers back from their advertising and marketing budget for these sham hearings....

 

[paddymurphy]

Boo hoo the mean conservatives are picking on poor Hillary, don't tell me if she wins we have to listen to this BS like we had to over Obungles

They were not picking on her; they were getting their asses handed to them by the next President.

 

[Manonthestreet]