You mean it isn't what the liberals wanted. The EC prevents big city libs from running rough shod over everyone else. This is the United STATES, not Europe. Each state has a say, don't like it? Move to Europe.So if the electors do not vote for Trump it goes to the GOP House, why would it not go to the person who really won Clinton?
I would hate to have Pence or Ryan be President, even worst than Trump.
Electors will cast their ballots on Dec. 19.
If anti-Trump electors manage to whip up enough votes against him, the decision would then go to the GOP-controlled House.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/harvard-professor-says-gop-electors-are-close-to-blocking-trump-win/ar-AAlx8zJ?ocid=eventhub
Exactly ! Every other country in the world who has elections , goes by the popular vote. They don't have this electoral nonsense crap.
With the last three elections the winning candidate/president won both the popular and electoral vote. So it was in line with what the people wanted. But with this election and 2000, it was not what the people wanted.
Yep. The liberals don't just want cities to swell the votes with legal voters either. Right now for example the city of fraud Chicago can't steal more than the electoral votes in Illinois and illegal alien importer California can't steal more than California's EVs. If we go to PV, those fraud caps are removed. No one who believes in America picking our own leaders would support going to PV under the present system.
Penelope's claims are worse than that though. She said the dipshit Hillary actually ran for the popular vote. Kudos to her for that heads up. We haven't had anyone THAT dumb run for President since Gore did the same thing in 2000. Makes one shudder how close they came.
Thanks for the info, Penelope!