Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
fucktard. it is team trump that claims immunity. delete your account.The fact that you think he needs imnunity is funny. You do realize that he ALSO has a 1st Amendment right to say whatever he wants.
Are you asking?I've got brass ball the size of canon balls thanks for asking
I don't think or I am not sure that the PAC can pay these types of bills.Trump is worth billions, he has a PAC to pay his legal bills with $200 million in it.
Trump can hire more than enough lawyers to prepare his defense in just months. Not years.
Some person rang the gong and this is all Democrats can do now. They want to screw up the forum.Im mad because you morons are too stupid to have any idea how stupid you sound.
I’ve been doing an extensive amount of remedial government education for you flunkies including pointing out there is no constitutional provision for presidential immunitySome person rang the gong and this is all Democrats can do now. They want to screw up the forum.
Prosecutor Smith is extremely confused.It would have cause a rather important change to the law if an ex-potus could not be tried and convicted of felonies he committed while potus. Or at least since Nixon, I thought most of us thought that because our judiciary has always been non-partisan
I have even actually quoted the Constitution and it is very easy to understand. For Crimes as president, the house impeaches and the Senate convicts. The Senate refused two times to convict Trump. You must be as confused as is Jack Smith the lawyer.I’ve been doing an extensive amount of remedial government education for you flunkies including pointing out there is no constitutional provision for presidential immunity
That’s the procedure for removing the president.I have even actually quoted the Constitution and it is very easy to understand. For Crimes as president, the house impeaches and the Senate convicts. The Senate refused two times to convict Trump. You must be as confused as is Jack Smith the lawyer.
Are you asking?
"What disagreements do you have with liberals, Mac?"
His acts happened when he was president. Why don't you understand the constitution? I know you are as confused as is Jack Smith who is a lawyer and so confused he went begging to the Supreme Court.That’s the procedure for removing the president.
He’s not the president. We don’t need to remove him.
No one is confused. You’re just being evasive because nothing in the constitution says the president has any immunity.
So what if the acts happened when he was president?His acts happened when he was president. Why don't you understand the constitution? I know you are as confused as is Jack Smith who is a lawyer and so confused he went begging to the Supreme Court.
Haha, Smith eats Trump's lunch.WASHINGTON (AP) — Special counsel Jack Smith on Monday asked the Supreme Court to take up and rule quickly on whether former President Donald Trump can be prosecuted on charges he plotted to overturn the 2020 election results.
Smith made his request for the court to act with unusual speed to prevent any delays that could push back the trial of the 2024 Republican presidential primary front-runner, currently set to begin on March 4, until after next year’s presidential election.
A federal judge ruled the case could go forward, but Trump signaled he would ask the federal appeals court in Washington to reverse that outcome. Smith is attempting to bypass the appeals court, the usual next step in the process, and have the Supreme Court take up the matter directly.
More at the link below...
SPECIAL COUNSEL PUSHES SCOTUS FOR SPEEDY TRUMP RULING
Wise move by Special Counsel Jack Smith to get speedy SCOTUS ruling. What do you think>
This is not about double Jeopardy.
Lets try this about Biden to help you get it.
Today he can't be charged since he is president. The sole remedy as president is to be removed from office. Then he can be tried for acts as a civilian.
Say as president Trump murdered a person. Once impeached and convicted, then he can be tried for murder. Trump however committed no crimes at all. Nothing even to be impeached for. They tried that as you must recall.
I am not discussing if Impeach is criminal.
I find it very amazing so many Democrats are full of certaintyTrump has been indicted for crimes upon probable cause.
The determination of guilt or not, well, that is what the trial is for. Saying "Trump however committed no crimes at all." is premature. The trail will be where that is determined.
WW
So what if the acts happened when he was president?
I'm sure you know why Ford pardoned Nixon and possibly lost the 1976 presidential election as a result.I have even actually quoted the Constitution and it is very easy to understand. For Crimes as president, the house impeaches and the Senate convicts. The Senate refused two times to convict Trump. You must be as confused as is Jack Smith the lawyer.
Getting the decision over with... precludes being used later for an appeal.Why is it a "wise move?"
What an absurd and self-serving interpretation of what is happening.and yet the lawyer prosecuting Trump is in the Supreme Court so confused he is begging them to explain it to him.
That is possible that Ford lost over that. Don't forget who picked Ford.I'm sure you know why Ford pardoned Nixon and possibly lost the 1976 presidential election as a result.
