Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
- 245
- Thread starter
- #621
Only a fool would think it idiotic to defend the location the Benghazi survivors were being moved to. It's a good thing you are not making military decisions.There was no "stand down" order. There was an order to defend the embassy in Tripoli after Hicks reported that there was a call to attack the Tripoli embassy, which is where the Benghazi survivors were being taken to at the time.
From Hicks' testimony:
HICKS: "About 12:30 at the same time that we see the Twitter feeds that are asserting that Ansar Sharia is responsible for the attack, we also see a call for an attack on the embassy in Tripoli."
Once again, Ed...I repeat my question. Who was in charge of an operation that deemed it a good strategy to send protection to a facility that might be attacked while denying protection to a facility the WAS under attack? Who would be THAT idiotic?
They were not being moved anywhere, they were holed up waiting for help from Tripoli, and the team that got on the same flight the military was ordered not to board came under attack when they arrived. They did manage to beat off that attack, which is why it is honest to say they were not needed, but it is dishonest to say they would not have arrived in time to help.