Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or..to condense your post to its cogent whole:
But..but...but...Obama!
Trump needs all the intel he can get to hold an advantage in case he sits down with Meuller.
Rudi spilled the beans
Giuliani told HuffPost that Trump needed the information about the informant before deciding whether to agree to an interview with special counsel Robert Mueller. “We can’t let our guy go in and be questioned without knowing this,” he said.
In other words, according to Giuliani, Trump convened the meeting to gain a strategic advantage in his personal negotiations with the special counsel.
...but yet Liberal Extremists and snowflakes would have us believe that...what...the Russians did all of this in an attempt to influence the election FOR DONALD TRUMP?!
Negative, Barry Jock-sniffer. My point was:Or..to condense your post to its cogent whole: But..but...but...Obama!
Doesn't every criminal wish they could have a copy of all the evidence against them, before they decide what story to tell.
Nielsen? You left out Feinstein, Reid, Schumer, and other prominent Democrats, who when pushed to answer if they had seen any evidence to support the Witch Hunt all said 'NO!'...but yet Liberal Extremists and snowflakes would have us believe that...what...the Russians did all of this in an attempt to influence the election FOR DONALD TRUMP?!
Is that you Ms Nielsen?
Donald Trump’s homeland security secretary, Kirstjen Nielsen, told reporters on Tuesday she was unaware of intelligence assessments that Russia favored Trump over Hillary Clinton in the 2016 election.Homeland security chief: I haven't seen intel that showed Russia favored Trump
“I do not believe I’ve seen that conclusion that the specific intent was to help President Trump win,” she said. “I’m not aware of that.”
Nielsen’s comments stand at odds with the US intelligence community, which concluded in 2017 that Russia tried to influence the 2016 election to benefit Trump. Last week, the Senate intelligence committee said it agreed with that assessment.
The problem is there is no crime, never was a crime, never was any evidence of a crime...involving Trump. When you loo at all the evidence against Obama and his administration, you have a completely different story....Doesn't every criminal wish they could have a copy of all the evidence against them, before they decide what story to tell.
Nielsen? You left out Feinstein, Reid, Schumer, and other prominent Democrats, who when pushed to answer if they had seen any evidence to support the Witch Hunt all said 'NO!'
Feinstein: No Evidence Of Russian Collusion With Trump Campaign, But There Are Rumors
Feinstein: No evidence Trump campaign received 'dirt' on Clinton - CNN Video
Check it out..dude..this thread is not about Obama..start an anti-Obama thread of your own..I'm sure you'll get plenty of action.Negative, Barry Jock-sniffer. My point was:Or..to condense your post to its cogent whole: But..but...but...Obama!
ALL THE EXISTING EVIDENCE IN THE WORLD SHOWS OBAMA AND HIS CRIMINAL ILLEGALLY-COLLUDING ADMINISTRATION AIDED, ABETTED, ASSISTED, AND PROTECTED RUSSIA AND PUTIN WHILE THEY PILLAGED AND PLUNDERED THE UNITED STATES....
...AND SNOWFLAKES LIKE YOU CONTINUE TO YAWN AT THE EVIDENCE WHILE CONTINUING TO PROMOTE THE FALSE NARRATIVE CREATED AND PUSHED BY PROVEN TREASONOUS OBAMA ADMINISTRATION / CABINET / AGENCY DIRECTORS.
Those are some pretty impressive words there. So, if you're as smart as those words suggest you are, why on earth are you a leftist - which - by definition - is a dependent state that needs others to think and do for them???!!!I try to post so that you leftists may understand. If that means dumbing down, then I have accomplished my goal.Your posts never suggest thinking, nor do they support others in that quest. Some day in the distant future you may grow up, and post something of substance, thoughtful or thought provoking.
Thanks so much for sharing, your opinions are very telling, and though there is no substance nor thought behind it.
Now you understand! When you, as a leftist, learn to think and do for yourself, get back to me. I will at that time post something that you can grasp! Good luck!
For the record: This ^^^ is not a rebuttal, nor is it substantive, thoughtful or thought provoking.
The use of the term "leftist" as a pejorative is not substantive and your post is a childish*** response by one whose best work - so to speak - is to echo others who lack substance, thinking and credibility.
*** I know you are, but what am I, and, I'm rubber, you're glue, whatever you call me bounces off of me and sticks to you.
As I suggested, grow up!
Show us on the doll where Putin touched you to make you flip your voteIt was Russians who infiltrated the Trump campaign, not the FBI.The extremely nervous charlatan-in-chief has chosen (in his infamous barrage of tweets instead of news conferences) to label the FBI investigation as "spy-gate"......
I don't know if ANY right winger on here still has an ounce of objectivity left, but at the very least consider these facts:
1. the Trump campaign was thoroughly informed that there were ample suspicions that the Russians were trying to infiltrate both campaigns.
2. Trump hired several people within his campaign who either boasted of their ties to Russian information (Papadapolous) OR were actively being recruited by Russian agents (Page).......not to mention the crooked Manafort and Flynn.
3. IF the FBI investigation was POLITICAL and not simply the FBI performing its functions.....THEN information on the Russian influence on the Trump campaign would have been exposed BEFORE the election....and, obviously, that did not happen.........(and conversely, the FBI's Comey did screw over the Clinton campaign.)
So, Mr. Trump.......where the hell do you find the basis to be "irate"???.............Unless, of course, you're trying to rally your moronic base to reject the upcoming storm (pardon the expression) of Mueller's investigation???
Funny how the President doesn't make so much as a single tweet to complain about a foreign government infiltrating his campaign, isn't it?
Do you honestly believe that? It's a particularly amusing allegation..given the indictment FOR lying to the FBI! The indictment for money laundering? Most of the indictments have nothing at all to do with anyone's statements..but are the results of evidence..yup, evidence..uncovered via patient investigation. AKA..the paper trail.TO-DATE THERE'S NO SMOKE, AND I'M LAUGHING MY ASS OFF @ TREATED TRUMP FAIRLY BUT CHEATED CLINTON OUT OF A WIN YOU WILL NEVER GET OVER.
So, Mr. Trump.......where the hell do you find the basis to be "irate"???.............Unless, of course, you're trying to rally your moronic base to reject the upcoming storm (pardon the expression) of Mueller's investigation??? WITCH HUNT
"To date there's NO smoke"?????..............Really, nitwit?
View attachment 195027
......and, regarding the "Witch Hunt"....(hannity would be proud of you.) How did that mantra worked out for that other guy?
..View attachment 195028.
You stupid fuck. The indictments are unrelated and primarily the result of misinformation aka "lying to the FBI".
Has it ever occurred to you to post facts garnered by learning...about both sides of the issues of the day--rather than just knee-jerking along with all the other partisan hacks?
Just askin...
ROFL. Brennan has admitted the government spied on the Trump campaign, so how are they delusions? The conspiritors are going to delude themselves straight into an orange jump suit.The extremely nervous charlatan-in-chief has chosen (in his infamous barrage of tweets instead of news conferences) to label the FBI investigation as "spy-gate"......
I don't know if ANY right winger on here still has an ounce of objectivity left, but at the very least consider these facts:
1. the Trump campaign was thoroughly informed that there were ample suspicions that the Russians were trying to infiltrate both campaigns.
2. Trump hired several people within his campaign who either boasted of their ties to Russian information (Papadapolous) OR were actively being recruited by Russian agents (Page).......not to mention the crooked Manafort and Flynn.
3. IF the FBI investigation was POLITICAL and not simply the FBI performing its functions.....THEN information on the Russian influence on the Trump campaign would have been exposed BEFORE the election....and, obviously, that did not happen.........(and conversely, the FBI's Comey did screw over the Clinton campaign.)
So, Mr. Trump.......where the hell do you find the basis to be "irate"???.............Unless, of course, you're trying to rally your moronic base to reject the upcoming storm (pardon the expression) of Mueller's investigation???
A concern that every citizen should have, is Trump may really believe these delusions, and such paranoia puts all of us at risk.
When the government spies on the opposition party, it's going down the same road as Russia and Venzeula. The FBI and CIA broke numerous laws to do this. About a dozen people need to go to prison.The governments first duty is to protect its citizens, which includes voting rights. It would be a dereliction of duty to not have SOME investigation by the FBI. To call this SPYGATE is the most desperate overreach I have ever seen in politics. This response reveals the level of panic within the administration, which is so high, they are willing to grasp at any straw placed in front of them. Problem is that straw is a NoOSE! See ya in prison!
