Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 95,858
- 70,756
Wrong. Again.Again. This applies to private property. Something painted on the street isn’t private property.
It applies to private and public property.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Wrong. Again.Again. This applies to private property. Something painted on the street isn’t private property.
What “facts”. If there’s a law distinguishing painted road decorations as different than all other road markings should be easy to post. That you haven’t tell us everything we need to know.
No it doenst. Me damaging your property is treated differently under the law than me damaging public propertyWrong. Again.
It applies to private and public property.
I'm waiting for an serious accident to happen as a result of the lack of traction on that excessive paint. But WTF, the taxpayers of Spokane have plenty of money to shell out for stupid fee-good projects gone wrong. I steer clear of that county at all costs.No it doenst. Me damaging your property is treated differently under the law than me damaging public property
Nope. Sorry. It can be charged as criminal mischief in Florida.No it doenst. Me damaging your property is treated differently under the law than me damaging public property
Well doing burnouts on a public street is a safety risk to everyone involved so yeah you would think anyone doing so should be a concern to government and society. Doing it on top of a City sanctioned art display is just moronic.What about all the people in government and society who were offended by skid marks on a street? That’s the better question
So you agree damaging public property is a crime, like say a city approved piece of art.No it doenst. Me damaging your property is treated differently under the law than me damaging public property
I agree that the government should treat thisSo you agree damaging public property is a crime, like say a city approved piece of art.
Thus admitting you don't think they should be treated the same.I agree that the government should treat this
View attachment 965911
Anand this
View attachment 965912
The same.
That said the second one shouldn’t be on the street to begin with.
You must be immune to reading comprehension.Thus admitting you don't think they should be treated the same.
You must be immune to cognitive dissonance.
Keep your hands to yourself and respect other people’s property isn’t that hard, unless you’re a closed minded bigot
If you want to give them a ticket, that’s fine.Well doing burnouts on a public street is a safety risk to everyone involved so yeah you would think anyone doing so should be a concern to government and society. Doing it on top of a City sanctioned art display is just moronic.
?Thus admitting you don't think they should be treated the same.
You must be immune to cognitive dissonance.
If they were treated the same, then no problem with either of them being there.You must be immune to reading comprehension.
How does saying one shouldn't even be allowed to be there mean treating them the same??
How does wanting to treat things the same mean not wanting to treat them the same?
One is a political statement which the Government shouldn’t be involved in. They should be treated the same under the law if they are going to put it on the road though. Goodness you are dumb.If they were treated the same, then no problem with either of them being there.
I.E., the opposite of what you said.
Yeah, you fked up again. Even when you try to deceive, the truth still comes out.
That’s just the bullshit you choose to believe. The same folks who went ape shit when the public property they liked was vandalized are seeing no problem with this vandalism. Like then don’t do the crime if you are going to be a bitch when caught.If you want to give them a ticket, that’s fine.
A felony? That’s state-imposed intimidation/punishment for defacing their religious symbol.
The intent of the “pride” flag crosswalk is political. The Government should never be pushing political statements via the public money, unless it’s going to do it for all points of view regardless of how objectionable some people might find them. Why aren’t there crosswalk flags for (insert political movement here)?How does saying one shouldn't even be allowed to be there mean treating them the same?
Jesus, are they putting lead in paint again?
Damn that government of freedom embracing the freedom to love and live how you choose. Can’t have that shit.One is a political statement which the Government shouldn’t be involved in. They should be treated the same under the law if they are going to put it on the road though. Goodness you are dumb.
Were the people who defaced the confederate generals statues charged with a felony?That’s just the bullshit you choose to believe. The same folks who went ape shit when the public property they liked was vandalized are seeing no problem with this vandalism. Like then don’t do the crime if you are going to be a bitch when caught.