RandomVariable
VIP Member
- Jan 7, 2014
- 5,103
- 360
- 85
- Thread starter
- #61
Senator Fischer keeps talking about the government doing "job creation". What does that mean?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You should take a few minutes to think about what you are going to write. First of all you make a rather foolish statement that people are being paid "to not work." Then you acknowledge that the economy is not thriving which means, THERE ARE FEW JOBS AVAILABLE. You do realize that these two statements are in conflict with each other, don't you? Why would you pay someone "not to work" when there are no jobs to be had?We need to stop paying people to not work. Maybe these people could actually find a job if Congress would do their's, but as long as we have people in charge in both the Executive and Legislative branches who don't know how to make an economy thrive this is going to be how it is for at least another few years.
Senator Fischer just stated that the tax code needs to be modified so that all those tax exemptions for those special interests that were put in the 80's are taken out. (She might want to check here presidential timeline.)
Five years and you fucks HAVE fixed the economy.Five years and you fucks haven't fixed the economy yet?
Five fucking years?
Now watch, within a few hours, some dim will be telling us about how the economy is so good.
unfuckingbelievable
You should take a few minutes to think about what you are going to write. First of all you make a rather foolish statement that people are being paid "to not work." Then you acknowledge that the economy is not thriving which means, THERE ARE FEW JOBS AVAILABLE. You do realize that these two statements are in conflict with each other, don't you? Why would you pay someone "not to work" when there are no jobs to be had?We need to stop paying people to not work. Maybe these people could actually find a job if Congress would do their's, but as long as we have people in charge in both the Executive and Legislative branches who don't know how to make an economy thrive this is going to be how it is for at least another few years.
Oh, and about those benefits, each state has its own way of calculating them. The amount you receive cannot exceed the wage you received while working. In fact, the amount received is a fraction of your previous wage. Also, there is a maximum to the benefits that varies from state to state. The maximum benefit in Arizona, the state with the lowest benefits, is $250 per week. If a person worked a 40 hour week and received $250 dollars his hourly wage would be about $6.25 per hour which is below minimum wage (Min. wage in Arizona is $7.90 per hour). Bear in mind that the $250 is the MAXIMUM benefit in Arizona and that most people receive less than that amount.The bottom line is this, if you think living on unemployment benefits is a sweet deal and that people are choosing not to find work so they can enjoy the easy life, you must be dumb as a rock.
And finally, YOU do understand that the gop primary goal is not to improve the economy. YOU do realize that their primary goal is to make sure President Obama is stopped from achieveing any success even if that means putting this country's economy in the sewer. YOU DO UNDERSTAND THAT THE GOP DOES NOT WANT THE ECONOMY TO IMPROVE. That is the reason this Congress was only able to pass 55 bills this year and not one of them was a jobs bill. You do realize the last Congress has been rated the worst Congress in history. YOU DO REALIZE THIS STUFF, DON'T YOU?
more people getting healthcare means MORE healthcare jobs.
make sense
Why not pay for doing nothing for 5 years?? 10?? life??
Jeez.. it never ends with the lazy crowd
Live: Updates from the Senate floor. To be continued....
Let's take more money from American businesses and give it to people for not working. In fact, the more people we employ, the more we pay for people to not work. Obama isn't finished destroying the economy yet, and he's not giving up trying.
more people getting healthcare means MORE healthcare jobs.
make sense
More people lost their healthcare insurance than are getting it. Yea shit is really working huh? You stupid fuck!!
There is instantaineous money for War and bombs, but no money for people who are just trying
to survive who paid their taxes. Something is wrong with governmental priorities here.
There is an irony in the gop finding new revenue for bombs and not this. And, it's one the dems want to exploit in Nov.
Gotta BUY them votes!Why not pay for doing nothing for 5 years?? 10?? life??
Jeez.. it never ends with the lazy crowd
The lazy crowd make up most of the retards who vote Democrat. So it shouldn't be much of a surprise that Odumbo and the Democrat jackoffs in Congress would push for more free money for that important voting group.
One way to get the long-term unemployment back on the payroll is to have the government cover their paycheck for a period of time. This gives companies a risk-free way to see what the employee can contribute, while giving workers a possible foot in the door. So instead of paying people for not working, pay the employer for giving them a try.We need to stop paying people to not work. Maybe these people could actually find a job if Congress would do their's, but as long as we have people in charge in both the Executive and Legislative branches who don't know how to make an economy thrive this is going to be how it is for at least another few years.
While killing the private sector so NO ONE looking for a job can find one...THUS keeping them on the dole and THUS buying votes...CREATE a problem, PRETEND to have a solution...and the voters will eat out of your hands...GOOD to be the KINGS...So what's true...from the Democrats
Obama has done such an outstanding job getting the ecoonmy in such good shape or
The Obama economy sucks so bad that we need to extend UE benefits again,and again,and again,and again...