Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
^^^ Old man, pretending to be female. Pathetic
Boring...old man. LOL You don't realize I know who you are LMAO
Yawn....Obamacare doesn't affect me. Our insurance is fully paid for. It's losers like you that mooch off the hard working people of this nation. Nothing to proud of old man
I work for an insurer.Rubio disagrees with the decision because "people are getting hit with a $4,000 deductible". I guess he thinks a $30,000 bill is preferable to an insurance deductible.
And he is wrong, it is more like 6000
Boring...old man. LOL You don't realize I know who you are LMAO
Yawn....Obamacare doesn't affect me. Our insurance is fully paid for. It's losers like you that mooch off the hard working people of this nation. Nothing to proud of old man
^^^ Old man, pretending to be female. Pathetic
Boring...old man. LOL You don't realize I know who you are LMAO
Yawn....Obamacare doesn't affect me. Our insurance is fully paid for. It's losers like you that mooch off the hard working people of this nation. Nothing to proud of old man
Funny how things work. Me and the wife lost our healthcare because of the EXCUSE that Obamacare was going to be so cheap. Yet all that happened was we were dropped and the company now picks up nothing. But I make too much for subsidizes. Success is once again punished.
A friend of mind when on the ACA website and tried to sign up. When they were asked if they were employed, when they answered no, it kicked them off the site.
Obamacare does effect you.
^^^ Old man, pretending to be female. Pathetic
Boring...old man. LOL You don't realize I know who you are LMAO
Yawn....Obamacare doesn't affect me. Our insurance is fully paid for. It's losers like you that mooch off the hard working people of this nation. Nothing to proud of old man
Saving the lives of people who struggle to pay healthcare costs is not mooching
It is considered a basic human right in most countries
And like SS, it pays for itself.How about cons quit obstructing so that it gets written correctly?Another loss for conservatives trying to take away peoples healthcare
So basically if a law is big enough, and poorly written enough, it can't be overturned no matter how much the court realizes the wording was explicit to the States?
Four words
A petty attempt by Republicans to hurt Americans just so they can destroy Obamacare
How about the people who write a law pay attention when doing it?
Exactly the same thing happened when Medicare was passed. The difference was that we didn't have an entire party intent on bringing down the country. The parties worked together and the result is that Medicare now works very well and within budget.
Prove it. I say you're lying, none of that ever happened.
Boring...old man. LOL You don't realize I know who you are LMAO
Yawn....Obamacare doesn't affect me. Our insurance is fully paid for. It's losers like you that mooch off the hard working people of this nation. Nothing to proud of old man
Funny how things work. Me and the wife lost our healthcare because of the EXCUSE that Obamacare was going to be so cheap. Yet all that happened was we were dropped and the company now picks up nothing. But I make too much for subsidizes. Success is once again punished.
A friend of mind when on the ACA website and tried to sign up. When they were asked if they were employed, when they answered no, it kicked them off the site.
Obamacare does effect you.
I can't see Scalia and Thomas backing SSM. And Alito is questionable, imo.Obama:
Lily Ledbetter act - a DEM win
Auto Bailout - a DEM win
ACA - a DEM win
Got Osama bin Ladin - an AMERICAN win under a DEM president
ending DADT/gays in the military - a DEM win
Indian Trade Pact - a DEM win.
Renegotiated STARK treaty with Russia - a DEM win
Pacific Trade Agreement - a DEM win.
President Obama will indeed be able to claim that the vast majority of what he wanted to push through the US Congress indeed came to pass.
His record of successes will be greater than either Reagan's or Eisenhower's.
Congratulations, Mr. President.
He can add nationwide samesex marriage early next week
The court wants to go out on a high note
Yes, I am suspecting that it will be a majority decision for SSM.
And then the Right will be seeing black helicopters everywhere.
But I can see Kennedy supporting it.
It will be at least a 5-4 decision, if not a 6-3 decision.
I doubt it will be a 7-2 decision.
On CNN it is being argued that Robert's decision is actually a very Conservative decision.
Reality is not in your vocabulary.Mehh. The next president will repeal and replace it. The one single thing Obama accomplished in two terms, will be gone.
It didn't say it clearly enough.Judges oppose jury nullification but here we have judicial nullification where judges ignore what the law clearly says.
I just cannot see Scalia and Thomas bucking the Pope. I think it really is that simple. Scalia is interesting because he really is a lion of a champion of individual 4th amendment rights. But both men are very socially conservative and toe the doctrinal line. Roberts, not so much. Alito more so, but law may trump religion.I can't see Scalia and Thomas backing SSM. And Alito is questionable, imo.Obama:
Lily Ledbetter act - a DEM win
Auto Bailout - a DEM win
ACA - a DEM win
Got Osama bin Ladin - an AMERICAN win under a DEM president
ending DADT/gays in the military - a DEM win
Indian Trade Pact - a DEM win.
Renegotiated STARK treaty with Russia - a DEM win
Pacific Trade Agreement - a DEM win.
President Obama will indeed be able to claim that the vast majority of what he wanted to push through the US Congress indeed came to pass.
His record of successes will be greater than either Reagan's or Eisenhower's.
Congratulations, Mr. President.
He can add nationwide samesex marriage early next week
The court wants to go out on a high note
Yes, I am suspecting that it will be a majority decision for SSM.
And then the Right will be seeing black helicopters everywhere.
But I can see Kennedy supporting it.
It will be at least a 5-4 decision, if not a 6-3 decision.
I doubt it will be a 7-2 decision.
On CNN it is being argued that Robert's decision is actually a very Conservative decision.
I can't see Scalia and Thomas backing SSM. And Alito is questionable, imo.Obama:
Lily Ledbetter act - a DEM win
Auto Bailout - a DEM win
ACA - a DEM win
Got Osama bin Ladin - an AMERICAN win under a DEM president
ending DADT/gays in the military - a DEM win
Indian Trade Pact - a DEM win.
Renegotiated STARK treaty with Russia - a DEM win
Pacific Trade Agreement - a DEM win.
President Obama will indeed be able to claim that the vast majority of what he wanted to push through the US Congress indeed came to pass.
His record of successes will be greater than either Reagan's or Eisenhower's.
Congratulations, Mr. President.
He can add nationwide samesex marriage early next week
The court wants to go out on a high note
Yes, I am suspecting that it will be a majority decision for SSM.
And then the Right will be seeing black helicopters everywhere.
But I can see Kennedy supporting it.
It will be at least a 5-4 decision, if not a 6-3 decision.
I doubt it will be a 7-2 decision.
On CNN it is being argued that Robert's decision is actually a very Conservative decision.
I think Roberts understands the inevitability of SSM in this country. It is his court and he will want to go down in history as supporting it
Scalia, Thomas and Alito are lost causes
Boring...old man. LOL You don't realize I know who you are LMAO
Yawn....Obamacare doesn't affect me. Our insurance is fully paid for. It's losers like you that mooch off the hard working people of this nation. Nothing to proud of old man
Saving the lives of people who struggle to pay healthcare costs is not mooching
It is considered a basic human right in most countries
It is a basic human right in all of the rest of the first world. Only in the greatest nation on the face of the Earth, where Conservative fucktards can muck up everything, can one still not think of basic health care as an essential to good living.
It didn't say it clearly enough.Judges oppose jury nullification but here we have judicial nullification where judges ignore what the law clearly says.
