bendog
Diamond Member
U really do coach the broncos, right?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about we skip the church part and go with the rest of it? That would make for a better place to live.
Why not let each person decide on his/her own about church and religion? Its called freedom, something you libs have a hard time dealing with
I said nothing about not allowing people to worship as they choose. But you said nothing about freedom. You included going to church in the same category as the other things that "Don't want to do that...leave the country...or end up...in the dirt...with bullets in ya".
So when you say people will either go to church or at least pray, or you can leave or be killed, don't come back to me with your bullshit claims about freedom.
I have no problem with church or with freedom. You, on the other hand, demand that everyone pray or go to church, or they should leave or be shot.
Walllace was a racist. He was also a democrat. liberal and conservative do not apply.
The only reason Wallace was a democrat was because a republican couldn't win an election in Alabama until Guy Hunt did it. And he did it because of the way the dems screwed up and ignored the voters in the primary.
George Wallace was, first and foremost, a politician (one of the most successful in this country's history). And yes, it does matter whether he was liberal or conservative. If the actual facts matter, and not just some pretense that Wallace has something to do with the liberals of today.
Your problem is that you equate liberals to democrats and conservatives to republicans. its not that simple. but I know why you do it.
U really do coach the broncos, right?
Why not let each person decide on his/her own about church and religion? Its called freedom, something you libs have a hard time dealing with
I said nothing about not allowing people to worship as they choose. But you said nothing about freedom. You included going to church in the same category as the other things that "Don't want to do that...leave the country...or end up...in the dirt...with bullets in ya".
So when you say people will either go to church or at least pray, or you can leave or be killed, don't come back to me with your bullshit claims about freedom.
I have no problem with church or with freedom. You, on the other hand, demand that everyone pray or go to church, or they should leave or be shot.
deltex said those things, not me.
The only reason Wallace was a democrat was because a republican couldn't win an election in Alabama until Guy Hunt did it. And he did it because of the way the dems screwed up and ignored the voters in the primary.
George Wallace was, first and foremost, a politician (one of the most successful in this country's history). And yes, it does matter whether he was liberal or conservative. If the actual facts matter, and not just some pretense that Wallace has something to do with the liberals of today.
Your problem is that you equate liberals to democrats and conservatives to republicans. its not that simple. but I know why you do it.
I do it because it is accurate. You asked the question of LIBS, and now want to equate the democrats in Alabama in the 1960s with the democrats of today. That is absolutely inaccurate.
is the following a liberal belief?
"No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government"
-- Thomas Jefferson, 1 Thomas Jefferson Papers, 334
As someone pointed out earlier, that was a VERY liberal belief at the time.
Care to answer my question?
I really don't know if wallace was liberal or conservative on fiscal matters or international matters, taxation, and the other issues of today.
he was a racist, a democrat, and a loser. why is he relevant today?
Your problem is that you equate liberals to democrats and conservatives to republicans. its not that simple. but I know why you do it.
I do it because it is accurate. You asked the question of LIBS, and now want to equate the democrats in Alabama in the 1960s with the democrats of today. That is absolutely inaccurate.
please pay attention to who you are responding to. I said none of that.
Walllace was a racist. He was also a democrat. liberal and conservative do not apply.
The only reason Wallace was a democrat was because a republican couldn't win an election in Alabama until Guy Hunt did it. And he did it because of the way the dems screwed up and ignored the voters in the primary.
George Wallace was, first and foremost, a politician (one of the most successful in this country's history). And yes, it does matter whether he was liberal or conservative. If the actual facts matter, and not just some pretense that Wallace has something to do with the liberals of today.
Seems you are the one who is confused
Your problem is that you equate liberals to democrats and conservatives to republicans. its not that simple. but I know why you do it.
if the republican party was kept from cheating in elections there will be NO civil war.
stop cheating and let the people decide
The people with GUNS will come out on top.Everyone knows that at the rate things are going, we will probably have a 2nd Civil War sometime in our near future. The question is, who will come out on top?
Do you think it will be the Dems? The Right? The people? Or some dissident cell? What about a terrorist group?
My hopes and bets are on a dissident cell made up of the common people.
they really think they will just kill all the people who don't agree with them.
they don't know they are the vast minority.
the republican party lies to them all day long
Everyone knows that at the rate things are going, we will probably have a 2nd Civil War sometime in our near future. The question is, who will come out on top?
Do you think it will be the Dems? The Right? The people? Or some dissident cell? What about a terrorist group?
My hopes and bets are on a dissident cell made up of the common people.
Could you name a nation that hasnt devolved into civil war or been conquored by outsiders?
we are kind of beyond anything like that. You all talk a good game, but thats just it.
Really? Isn't that convenient? Why is it whenever you are called to actually back something up, you find some excuse not to?
actually it is the "people" who can make one shot, one kill.., of which i am very capable.
Thank You !!
You would piss your pants if you faced US military forces
hardly, i am a former Military fighter,
i fear not, you are a fucking idiot, the U.S. Military forces will be on the side of the patriots which are the black and white conservatives who want to save this nation from you commie traitors.
I'm thinking the winners will have turned you down during recruitment
Unless I am the winner! (maniacal laughter in background)
How old are you OldSchool? Too old to be of any real use in a military campaign, probably. I, on the other hand, practice shooting actual rifles (as opposed to video game ones) constantly, study military tactics and logistics, acquaint myself with military equipment and gear, condition myself for long marches and hikes and extreme weather conditions, am a very persuasive speaker (face to face), am highly manipulative, make wonderful grades throughout school, etc.
I'm thinking the winners will have turned you down during recruitment
Unless I am the winner! (maniacal laughter in background)
How old are you OldSchool? Too old to be of any real use in a military campaign, probably. I, on the other hand, practice shooting actual rifles (as opposed to video game ones) constantly, study military tactics and logistics, acquaint myself with military equipment and gear, condition myself for long marches and hikes and extreme weather conditions, am a very persuasive speaker (face to face), am highly manipulative, make wonderful grades throughout school, etc.