justoffal
Diamond Member
- Jun 29, 2013
- 24,763
- 16,816
- 1,405
Dumbass you just showed the history of the democrat party and inserted your own biased opinion of the Republican party.Republicans have been protecting blacks civil rights since 1866This is not about what the democratic party won't allow, it is about what the republican party has never allowed.
No they haven't.
U.S. v. Cruikshank
March 27, 1876
The Cruikshank case arose from the 1873 Colfax Massacre, in which a group of armed whites killed more than a hundred African American men as a result of a political dispute. Three men convicted of violating the 1870 Enforcement Act – a law aimed primarily at curbing Ku Klux Klan violence that forbade conspiracies to deny the constitutional rights of any citizen – appealed on the grounds that their indictments were insufficient. When the case reached the Supreme Court, the Court sided with the defendants, holding that the rights they were alleged to have violated were not enforceable in this case. The First and Second Amendment rights to assembly and the bearing of arms were, according to the Court’s ruling, intended only to restrict the actions of the federal government and did not apply to the states or private citizens, and the Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process and equal protection applied only to state action and again, not to the actions of individuals.
https://www.fjc.gov/history/timeline/us-v-cruikshank
Once again Chief Justice Waite, a REPUBLICAN:
Chief Justice Morrison Waite overturned the convictions of the defendants, holding that the plaintiffs had to rely on state courts for protection. Waite ruled that neither the First Amendment nor the Second Amendment applied to the actions of state governments or to individuals. He further ruled that the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment applied to the actions of state governments, but not to individuals. The decision left African Americans in the South at the mercy of increasingly hostile state governments dominated by white Democratic legislatures, and allowed groups such as the Ku Klux Klan to continue to use paramilitary force to suppress black voting.
Republicans were complicit in the oppression of blacks. And blacks voted strictly republican for almost 100 years while republicans didn't do a damn thing for black people. So democrats started to and blacks started leaving the republican party. Now I am not going to argue this with white republicans when I am black and was told by older blacks starting when I was a child during the 60's about why blacks left the mother fucking republican party. Republicans did the same thing then they are doing now, telling blacks how we should be republicans because republicans freed the slaves. That no matter how republicans treat us, we are to be forever grateful to dead men and women that you guys claim aren't here anymore for doing something to stop a problem you guys claim you are not responsible for today. So if you weren't alive during slavery, if you did not own slaves, if you should not be held to account for the sins of your great great grandparents, stop taking credit for what your great great grandparents did.
Nope. I showed some of the history of the republican party after slavery. Like I said, I'm not arguing about this with white republicans. I know the history of the republican party and blacks, I live it every day. So some white motherfucker can't tell me shit.
For someone who claims not to be a racist you post a lot of racist screeds. It it walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it's a duck. In this case a stone cold racist.
Nope Im2 will never tell you that he's not a racist. He is unabashedly and unapologetically a black liberation activist who would be perfectly happy with a 100 percent black society excluding all other races. He's not subtle about it..... makes no bones about it. His raison d'etre here is to justify revenge in the same mode the black slaves suffered at the hands of the pre-civil war whites. At about 13..1/2% of the population I'm not sure how they think they going to achieve that revenge; Though If the crime rate statistics are any indication they sure as hell are trying. Twenty years from now when the United States becomes a majority Latino Nation the question won't be whether or not Martin Luther King matters...
The new question will be:
Martin Luther Quiero?
Jo
Last edited: