The Carrier Deal

I wasn't joking all this time when I have been saying the pseudocons remind me of the 60s and 70s liberals.
 
google "hypocrisy". Kasich "cashed- in" on public service. He could've just gone home and done anything but he chose to go *cough* "work" for one of the "fast and loose" Wall St companies that helped bring the econmy down in the Great Recession that cost this great nation EXPONENTIALLY MORE THAN a paltry $7 mil kid. Be proud.
I guess that's why you support the guy who is hiring a lot of people from a firm that helped bring down the economy, eh? A guy who is enacting liberal policies to interfere in the free market with taxpayer bribes and high tariffs.

Yeah. Google "hypocrisy". You do that.

I guess that's why you support the guy who is hiring a lot of people from a firm that helped bring down the economy, eh?

Which firm, "helped bring down the economy"? How did they do it?
Goldman Sachs. Just like Lehman.

Let's have some fun and ask Dot Com what Lehman did to bring down the economy that Goldman didn't. :lol:

No specifics?
Why don't you ask Dot Com? He started this vein.

I have PLENTY of specifics. About both Lehman and Goldman.

I find it very interesting you have not asked Dot Com.

Google hypocrisy. ;)

When you're done tweaking dot, please post your theory about how they "helped bring down the economy".
 
I guess that's why you support the guy who is hiring a lot of people from a firm that helped bring down the economy, eh? A guy who is enacting liberal policies to interfere in the free market with taxpayer bribes and high tariffs.

Yeah. Google "hypocrisy". You do that.

I guess that's why you support the guy who is hiring a lot of people from a firm that helped bring down the economy, eh?

Which firm, "helped bring down the economy"? How did they do it?
Goldman Sachs. Just like Lehman.

Let's have some fun and ask Dot Com what Lehman did to bring down the economy that Goldman didn't. :lol:

No specifics?
Why don't you ask Dot Com? He started this vein.

I have PLENTY of specifics. About both Lehman and Goldman.

I find it very interesting you have not asked Dot Com.

Google hypocrisy. ;)

When you're done tweaking dot, please post your theory about how they "helped bring down the economy".
I'll wait for Dot Com to provide that first since he brought it up.

After you discuss it with him, then I will be more than happy to respond.
 
Just tell us what we already know, that u voted for hiLIARy just like the other USB Repubs who vote Dem- FakeyJakey, Joeb131. & Toro

Sent from my VS425PP using Tapatalk
It is amusing how a tard assumes that someone opposed to Trump voted for Hillary. Or Obama.

Why do you like to show off your stupidity in public? Serious question.
So it IS true you were a Lehman John- supporter then? :eusa_think: Not looking good for you
I made it quite plain who I supported, idiot. But you just keep showing off your stupidity. It's looking real good on you.

Lehman-John? Did you come up with that all by yourself, tard? As opposed to Goldman Don?
google "hypocrisy". Kasich "cashed- in" on public service. He could've just gone home and done anything but he chose to go *cough* "work" for one of the "fast and loose" Wall St companies that helped bring the econmy down in the Great Recession that cost this great nation EXPONENTIALLY MORE THAN a paltry $7 mil kid. Be proud.
I guess that's why you support the guy who is hiring a lot of people from a firm that helped bring down the economy, eh? A guy who is enacting liberal policies to interfere in the free market with taxpayer bribes and high tariffs.

Yeah. Google "hypocrisy". You do that.
ummm..... except that I didn't vote because I was a Bernie- supporter

Care to make any other assumptions?

Sent from my VS425PP using Tapatalk
 
It is amusing how a tard assumes that someone opposed to Trump voted for Hillary. Or Obama.

Why do you like to show off your stupidity in public? Serious question.
So it IS true you were a Lehman John- supporter then? :eusa_think: Not looking good for you
I made it quite plain who I supported, idiot. But you just keep showing off your stupidity. It's looking real good on you.

Lehman-John? Did you come up with that all by yourself, tard? As opposed to Goldman Don?
google "hypocrisy". Kasich "cashed- in" on public service. He could've just gone home and done anything but he chose to go *cough* "work" for one of the "fast and loose" Wall St companies that helped bring the econmy down in the Great Recession that cost this great nation EXPONENTIALLY MORE THAN a paltry $7 mil kid. Be proud.
I guess that's why you support the guy who is hiring a lot of people from a firm that helped bring down the economy, eh? A guy who is enacting liberal policies to interfere in the free market with taxpayer bribes and high tariffs.

Yeah. Google "hypocrisy". You do that.
ummm..... except that I didn't vote because I was a Bernie- supporter

Care to make any other assumptions?

Sent from my VS425PP using Tapatalk
"Just tell us what we already know, that u voted for hiLIARy "

Google hypocrisy.
 
So it IS true you were a Lehman John- supporter then? :eusa_think: Not looking good for you
I made it quite plain who I supported, idiot. But you just keep showing off your stupidity. It's looking real good on you.

Lehman-John? Did you come up with that all by yourself, tard? As opposed to Goldman Don?
google "hypocrisy". Kasich "cashed- in" on public service. He could've just gone home and done anything but he chose to go *cough* "work" for one of the "fast and loose" Wall St companies that helped bring the econmy down in the Great Recession that cost this great nation EXPONENTIALLY MORE THAN a paltry $7 mil kid. Be proud.
I guess that's why you support the guy who is hiring a lot of people from a firm that helped bring down the economy, eh? A guy who is enacting liberal policies to interfere in the free market with taxpayer bribes and high tariffs.

Yeah. Google "hypocrisy". You do that.
ummm..... except that I didn't vote because I was a Bernie- supporter

Care to make any other assumptions?

Sent from my VS425PP using Tapatalk
"Just tell us what we already know, that u voted for hiLIARy "

Google hypocrisy.
U were supporting the OTHER Wall St puppet. I wasn't too far off the mark

Your agenda here is clear
 
I made it quite plain who I supported, idiot. But you just keep showing off your stupidity. It's looking real good on you.

Lehman-John? Did you come up with that all by yourself, tard? As opposed to Goldman Don?
google "hypocrisy". Kasich "cashed- in" on public service. He could've just gone home and done anything but he chose to go *cough* "work" for one of the "fast and loose" Wall St companies that helped bring the econmy down in the Great Recession that cost this great nation EXPONENTIALLY MORE THAN a paltry $7 mil kid. Be proud.
I guess that's why you support the guy who is hiring a lot of people from a firm that helped bring down the economy, eh? A guy who is enacting liberal policies to interfere in the free market with taxpayer bribes and high tariffs.

Yeah. Google "hypocrisy". You do that.
ummm..... except that I didn't vote because I was a Bernie- supporter

Care to make any other assumptions?

Sent from my VS425PP using Tapatalk
"Just tell us what we already know, that u voted for hiLIARy "

Google hypocrisy.
U were supporting the OTHER Wall St puppet. I wasn't too far off the mark

Your agenda here is clear
You were WAY off the mark, retard.

But I am not the least surprised a Bernie supporter is backing Trump on protectionism and bribing corporations with tax money.
 
I guess that's why you support the guy who is hiring a lot of people from a firm that helped bring down the economy, eh? A guy who is enacting liberal policies to interfere in the free market with taxpayer bribes and high tariffs.

Yeah. Google "hypocrisy". You do that.

I guess that's why you support the guy who is hiring a lot of people from a firm that helped bring down the economy, eh?

Which firm, "helped bring down the economy"? How did they do it?
Goldman Sachs. Just like Lehman.

Let's have some fun and ask Dot Com what Lehman did to bring down the economy that Goldman didn't. :lol:

No specifics?
Why don't you ask Dot Com? He started this vein.

I have PLENTY of specifics. About both Lehman and Goldman.

I find it very interesting you have not asked Dot Com.

Google hypocrisy. ;)

When you're done tweaking dot, please post your theory about how they "helped bring down the economy".
After Lehman fell, investors putting one dollar into moneymarket accounts couldn't get a dollar back out. That never happened before, although in 1928, there weren't actual money market accounts.

You can try to debate after the fact what would have happened to the world economy if the US allowed other banks to fail.
 
I guess that's why you support the guy who is hiring a lot of people from a firm that helped bring down the economy, eh?

Which firm, "helped bring down the economy"? How did they do it?
Goldman Sachs. Just like Lehman.

Let's have some fun and ask Dot Com what Lehman did to bring down the economy that Goldman didn't. :lol:

No specifics?
Why don't you ask Dot Com? He started this vein.

I have PLENTY of specifics. About both Lehman and Goldman.

I find it very interesting you have not asked Dot Com.

Google hypocrisy. ;)

When you're done tweaking dot, please post your theory about how they "helped bring down the economy".
After Lehman fell, investors putting one dollar into moneymarket accounts couldn't get a dollar back out. That never happened before, although in 1928, there weren't actual money market accounts.

You can try to debate after the fact what would have happened to the world economy if the US allowed other banks to fail.
g5000's guy in the last election- "Lehman John Kasich" tells me all I need to know about his agenda.
 
Goldman Sachs. Just like Lehman.

Let's have some fun and ask Dot Com what Lehman did to bring down the economy that Goldman didn't. :lol:

No specifics?
Why don't you ask Dot Com? He started this vein.

I have PLENTY of specifics. About both Lehman and Goldman.

I find it very interesting you have not asked Dot Com.

Google hypocrisy. ;)

When you're done tweaking dot, please post your theory about how they "helped bring down the economy".
After Lehman fell, investors putting one dollar into moneymarket accounts couldn't get a dollar back out. That never happened before, although in 1928, there weren't actual money market accounts.

You can try to debate after the fact what would have happened to the world economy if the US allowed other banks to fail.
g5000's guy in the last election- "Lehman John Kasich" tells me all I need to know about his agenda.
Tell us what Lehman did which "helped bring the economy down" that Goldman didn't, hypocrite.

Even easier, tell Toddster what Lehman did to bring down the economy.
 
No specifics?
Why don't you ask Dot Com? He started this vein.

I have PLENTY of specifics. About both Lehman and Goldman.

I find it very interesting you have not asked Dot Com.

Google hypocrisy. ;)

When you're done tweaking dot, please post your theory about how they "helped bring down the economy".
After Lehman fell, investors putting one dollar into moneymarket accounts couldn't get a dollar back out. That never happened before, although in 1928, there weren't actual money market accounts.

You can try to debate after the fact what would have happened to the world economy if the US allowed other banks to fail.
g5000's guy in the last election- "Lehman John Kasich" tells me all I need to know about his agenda.
Tell us what Lehman did which "helped bring the economy down" that Goldman didn't, hypocrite.

Even easier, tell Toddster what Lehman did to bring down the economy.
They got in waaay over their head kid. You didn't know that? And the guy you were supporting in the last election went to do who knows what, peddle influence no doubt, after leaving Washington

Lehman Brothers - Wikipedia
Lehman's bankruptcy filing is the largest in US history,[5] and is thought to have played a major role in the unfolding of the late-2000s global financial crisis.

yeah.
 
Another lib hate thread, they would rather 1,000 Americans lost their jobs to Mexico than credit Trump with a win. If libs were an offensive line they would just jump to the side and let the opposing team mow down their quarterback, disgusting. These people are not even true Americans.
You have a lot of nerve calling yourself a conservative when you support Trump's liberal interference in the free market.

That's why I call you tards psuedocons. You don't know fuck-all about conservativism.

I told you not long ago that Trump would have you pseudocon tards buying off on liberal programs one by one. And look at you now!

You're just mad that I called BS on your stupid sour grapes narrative. Look we all know liberals lie, they lie through their teeth there isn't a reason to believe one damn thing spewing from their lying pie hole. So blather on till your blue in the face for all we care. :blahblah:
 
Why don't you ask Dot Com? He started this vein.

I have PLENTY of specifics. About both Lehman and Goldman.

I find it very interesting you have not asked Dot Com.

Google hypocrisy. ;)

When you're done tweaking dot, please post your theory about how they "helped bring down the economy".
After Lehman fell, investors putting one dollar into moneymarket accounts couldn't get a dollar back out. That never happened before, although in 1928, there weren't actual money market accounts.

You can try to debate after the fact what would have happened to the world economy if the US allowed other banks to fail.
g5000's guy in the last election- "Lehman John Kasich" tells me all I need to know about his agenda.
Tell us what Lehman did which "helped bring the economy down" that Goldman didn't, hypocrite.

Even easier, tell Toddster what Lehman did to bring down the economy.
They got in waaay over their head kid. You didn't know that? And the guy you were supporting in the last election went to do who knows what, peddle influence no doubt, after leaving Washington

Lehman Brothers - Wikipedia
Lehman's bankruptcy filing is the largest in US history,[5] and is thought to have played a major role in the unfolding of the late-2000s global financial crisis.

yeah.
You have no idea how over your head you are, dumbass.

Now what did Lehman do that Goldman didn't do to crash the economy?
 
Another lib hate thread, they would rather 1,000 Americans lost their jobs to Mexico than credit Trump with a win. If libs were an offensive line they would just jump to the side and let the opposing team mow down their quarterback, disgusting. These people are not even true Americans.
You have a lot of nerve calling yourself a conservative when you support Trump's liberal interference in the free market.

That's why I call you tards psuedocons. You don't know fuck-all about conservativism.

I told you not long ago that Trump would have you pseudocon tards buying off on liberal programs one by one. And look at you now!

You're just mad that I called BS on your stupid sour grapes narrative. Look we all know liberals lie, they lie through their teeth there isn't a reason to believe one damn thing spewing from their lying pie hole. So blather on till your blue in the face for all we care. :blahblah:
You're signing off a taxpayer bribe. Just like a liberal.

Trump is leading you all down the road to the Left. Just like I warned you.
 
Bear Stearns was allowed to fall. Lehman was allowed to fall.

But not Goldman Sachs. There were a lot of Goldman alumni in the Bush Administration, including the Secretary of the Treasury who bailed out of Goldman just before everything unraveled.

And now Trump is appointing another Goldman Sachs alum to be Secretary of the Treasury.

So, yeah. Google "hypocrisy", Dot Com. You do that.
 
Next thing you know, BluesLegend will be telling us 35% tariffs are a good thing when Trump does it. ;)
 
Another lib hate thread, they would rather 1,000 Americans lost their jobs to Mexico than credit Trump with a win. If libs were an offensive line they would just jump to the side and let the opposing team mow down their quarterback, disgusting. These people are not even true Americans.
You have a lot of nerve calling yourself a conservative when you support Trump's liberal interference in the free market.

That's why I call you tards psuedocons. You don't know fuck-all about conservativism.

I told you not long ago that Trump would have you pseudocon tards buying off on liberal programs one by one. And look at you now!

You're just mad that I called BS on your stupid sour grapes narrative. Look we all know liberals lie, they lie through their teeth there isn't a reason to believe one damn thing spewing from their lying pie hole. So blather on till your blue in the face for all we care. :blahblah:
You're signing off a taxpayer bribe. Just like a liberal.

Trump is leading you all down the road to the Left. Just like I warned you.

I'll say this slowly given your IQ, its Carrier's money, they earned that money, allowing them to keep their own money is not a bribe. I know you libs are dense but come on I'm starting to think you people need someone with a power of attorney to make your decisions for you.
 
Another lib hate thread, they would rather 1,000 Americans lost their jobs to Mexico than credit Trump with a win. If libs were an offensive line they would just jump to the side and let the opposing team mow down their quarterback, disgusting. These people are not even true Americans.
You have a lot of nerve calling yourself a conservative when you support Trump's liberal interference in the free market.

That's why I call you tards psuedocons. You don't know fuck-all about conservativism.

I told you not long ago that Trump would have you pseudocon tards buying off on liberal programs one by one. And look at you now!

You're just mad that I called BS on your stupid sour grapes narrative. Look we all know liberals lie, they lie through their teeth there isn't a reason to believe one damn thing spewing from their lying pie hole. So blather on till your blue in the face for all we care. :blahblah:
You're signing off a taxpayer bribe. Just like a liberal.

Trump is leading you all down the road to the Left. Just like I warned you.

I'll say this slowly given your IQ, its Carrier's money, they earned that money, allowing them to keep their own money is not a bribe. I know you libs are dense but come on I'm starting to think you people need someone with a power of attorney to make your decisions for you.
When a special interest pays LESS, someone else has to pay MORE, retard. Or worse, it ADDS TO THE DEBT, moron.

Which is why tax expenditures are no different from food stamps. They are paid for out of someone else's pocket.

This is Conservatism 101, pseudocon. No wonder Trump is able to lead you by the nose to Lefty Land.

The perfect con. The mark doesn't know he has been taken.
 
Another lib hate thread, they would rather 1,000 Americans lost their jobs to Mexico than credit Trump with a win. If libs were an offensive line they would just jump to the side and let the opposing team mow down their quarterback, disgusting. These people are not even true Americans.
You have a lot of nerve calling yourself a conservative when you support Trump's liberal interference in the free market.

That's why I call you tards psuedocons. You don't know fuck-all about conservativism.

I told you not long ago that Trump would have you pseudocon tards buying off on liberal programs one by one. And look at you now!

You're just mad that I called BS on your stupid sour grapes narrative. Look we all know liberals lie, they lie through their teeth there isn't a reason to believe one damn thing spewing from their lying pie hole. So blather on till your blue in the face for all we care. :blahblah:
You're signing off a taxpayer bribe. Just like a liberal.

Trump is leading you all down the road to the Left. Just like I warned you.

I'll say this slowly given your IQ, its Carrier's money, they earned that money, allowing them to keep their own money is not a bribe. I know you libs are dense but come on I'm starting to think you people need someone with a power of attorney to make your decisions for you.
When a special interest pays LESS, someone else has to pay MORE, retard. Or worse, it ADDS TO THE DEBT, moron.

Which is why tax expenditures are no different from food stamps. They are paid for out of someone else's pocket.

This is Conservatism 101, pseudocon. No wonder Trump is able to lead you by the nose to Lefty Land.

Why, because spending is out of control in government? Carrier is not your piggy bank you can raid to support your crack addict government spending habits.
 
You have a lot of nerve calling yourself a conservative when you support Trump's liberal interference in the free market.

That's why I call you tards psuedocons. You don't know fuck-all about conservativism.

I told you not long ago that Trump would have you pseudocon tards buying off on liberal programs one by one. And look at you now!

You're just mad that I called BS on your stupid sour grapes narrative. Look we all know liberals lie, they lie through their teeth there isn't a reason to believe one damn thing spewing from their lying pie hole. So blather on till your blue in the face for all we care. :blahblah:
You're signing off a taxpayer bribe. Just like a liberal.

Trump is leading you all down the road to the Left. Just like I warned you.

I'll say this slowly given your IQ, its Carrier's money, they earned that money, allowing them to keep their own money is not a bribe. I know you libs are dense but come on I'm starting to think you people need someone with a power of attorney to make your decisions for you.
When a special interest pays LESS, someone else has to pay MORE, retard. Or worse, it ADDS TO THE DEBT, moron.

Which is why tax expenditures are no different from food stamps. They are paid for out of someone else's pocket.

This is Conservatism 101, pseudocon. No wonder Trump is able to lead you by the nose to Lefty Land.

Why, because spending is out of control in government? Carrier is not your piggy bank you can raid to support your crack addict government spending habits.
Tax expenditures ARE spending, idiot.

After all the outlays for bridges to nowhere and food stamps and defense and Obamaphones and Social Security and whatnot, there then begins the real spending of $1.2 trillion on tax expenditures. You don't even know this is the most "out of control" spending in the budget! Simply amazing.

Expenditures which are paid for by higher tax rates and massive borrowing.

And that's just on the federal level!

Seriously. This is Conservatism 101. Have you ever read a book in your life? You don't even know the simplest basics of a philosophy to which you claim to adhere.

Pathetic.
 

Forum List

Back
Top