The hypocrisy and arrogance of atheism

[teapartysamurai]

you cannot DISCOUNT Creationism.

Creationism was debunked as religious BS by the Dover case where a conservative judge appointed by Bush sr ruled that there was no factual basis for it whatsoever and that it is simply an illegal attempt to impose religious beliefs in science classrooms.

Let me get this straight. A JUDICIAL JUDGE DECIDES WHAT IS SCIENCE????????????

Is that what you are reduced to. Saying a LEGAL case decides science?????????

That's pretty desperate!

 

[Hollie]

My next guss

I think that says you're a joke.

Yeah, but we've already established you don't think you just label and spew.

When you can think and address the op, do let me know.

Your OP was a smokescreen for ID'iot creationism. You follow a long line of hyper-religious loons who offered the same frantic tirades.

Um, no there is no smoke screen.

A) There is no hard evidence for God.

B) There is no hard evidence for how life began.

How is that a smoke screen?

It's very factual and out front.

If you can disprove those FACTS do let me know.

Until then you are just irritated that means you cannot DISCOUNT Creationism.

I actually can discount ID'iot creationism in the same way I discount all appeals to fear and ignorance.

Then you are proving it is YOU giving into fear and ignorance, because you HAVE YET TO PRODUCE FACT.

If there is more evidence for one theory than another, then PRODUCE IT.

Otherwise, to dismiss a theory sans evidence, isn't science, it's bias.

ID'iot creationism is not a theory. It's a religious claim tied to christian fundamentalists.

So actually, it is you who had not produced facts.

Let go of fear and ignorance. You will thank me when you do.

 

[Derideo_Te]

So name calling only matters when it applies to an individual?

So care to explain why you and your fellow teabaggers become so incensed when you are described as racists?

Is it because "YOU personally identify with" racism? In which case that is not the "fault" of those pointing out your racism according to your illogic.

See what happens when you flunk math and logic?

Wow, so when losing an argument change the subject?

What does the Tea Party have to do with whether or not God exists, how life began or life on other planets?

Getting pretty desperate out there!

I used an example to point out the fallacy of your position. That you either failed to comprehend the example or are just being disingenuous and deflecting because you cannot refute that you lack the basics of honesty and integrity is largely irrelevant at this juncture.

You have successfully managed to destroy your own credibility. Congratulations, you must be so proud of yourself for being the opposite of a Christian in every way that it actually matters.

But you DIDN'T prove a fallacy.

All you did was back up my first argument.

There's NO HARD EVIDENCE.

That's not a fallacy.

Try again!

Lying about what I posted does not refute the facts.

But I didn't lie.

You said you proved I posted a fallacy.

But as I pointed out you did not.

If you can refute that then do so.

Just calling me a liar sounds desperate on your part.

You are a hole for yourself now.

Would you like another shovel?

 

[teapartysamurai]

My next guss

Yeah, but we've already established you don't think you just label and spew.

When you can think and address the op, do let me know.

Your OP was a smokescreen for ID'iot creationism. You follow a long line of hyper-religious loons who offered the same frantic tirades.

Um, no there is no smoke screen.

A) There is no hard evidence for God.

B) There is no hard evidence for how life began.

How is that a smoke screen?

It's very factual and out front.

If you can disprove those FACTS do let me know.

Until then you are just irritated that means you cannot DISCOUNT Creationism.

I actually can discount ID'iot creationism in the same way I discount all appeals to fear and ignorance.

Then you are proving it is YOU giving into fear and ignorance, because you HAVE YET TO PRODUCE FACT.

If there is more evidence for one theory than another, then PRODUCE IT.

Otherwise, to dismiss a theory sans evidence, isn't science, it's bias.

ID'iot creationism is not a theory. It's a religious claim tied to christian fundamentalists.

So actually, it is you who had not produced facts.

Let go of fear and ignorance. You will thank me when you do.

It's not a theory BASED ON WHAT HARD FACT?

You LABELING it, isn't FACT OR EVIDENCE.

Give me the FACTS.

Simply labeling it as religion has no more validity than if I were to say the primordial pool theory is nothing more than "Godless atheism."

Wonderful way to dismiss something based on one's own biases and prejudices but damn lacking in EVIDENCE AND FACT.

Sorry, but you can keep repeating that, and I'm sure it will console you, but it won't carry a debate.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Wow, so when losing an argument change the subject?

What does the Tea Party have to do with whether or not God exists, how life began or life on other planets?

Getting pretty desperate out there!

I used an example to point out the fallacy of your position. That you either failed to comprehend the example or are just being disingenuous and deflecting because you cannot refute that you lack the basics of honesty and integrity is largely irrelevant at this juncture.

You have successfully managed to destroy your own credibility. Congratulations, you must be so proud of yourself for being the opposite of a Christian in every way that it actually matters.

But you DIDN'T prove a fallacy.

All you did was back up my first argument.

There's NO HARD EVIDENCE.

That's not a fallacy.

Try again!

Lying about what I posted does not refute the facts.

But I didn't lie.

You said you proved I posted a fallacy.

But as I pointed out you did not.

If you can refute that then do so.

Just calling me a liar sounds desperate on your part.

You are a hole for yourself now.

Would you like another shovel?

Then why is it you reduced to emoticons and snarky retreats?

 

[Derideo_Te]

you cannot DISCOUNT Creationism.

Creationism was debunked as religious BS by the Dover case where a conservative judge appointed by Bush sr ruled that there was no factual basis for it whatsoever and that it is simply an illegal attempt to impose religious beliefs in science classrooms.

Let me get this straight. A JUDICIAL JUDGE DECIDES WHAT IS SCIENCE????????????

Is that what you are reduced to. Saying a LEGAL case decides science?????????

That's pretty desperate!

The judge made a determination that creationism is NOT science because it fails to conform to the scientific method.

Once again you display your appalling home schooled ignorance.

 

[Syriusly]

I told you it was easy to defeat atheists.

I don't know why so many Christians are afraid to do so.

You are a liar

And a hypocrite

And a false Christian

Wow, I told you these guys would just twist themselves into pretzels.

This is usually the last part of the break down.

They are reduced to just shrieking insults to salve their bruised egos.

Sad, really!

This entire thread is nothing more than a tantrum- I am an atheist and I am more of a Christian than you are.

You are a liar

And a hypocrite

And a false Christian

I think Syriusly has had a mental breakdown.

All he can do is throw a tantrum and repeat the same thing.

I told you guys it isn't hard to beat atheists.

I don't know why some Christians are intimidated by it.

I staged this thread for that reason. To show Christians there's nothing to it.

I've done it so many times.

Once again- Show me where I have demanded hard evidence for God?

So far all you have done in this thread is rant about atheists- clearly you have some issue with persons who don't believe in your god- but that doesn't justify lying about me.

Because I am an atheist. And your OP accused me of hypocrisy.

So prove it.

And you can't.

Just a liar

And a hypocrite

And a blemish on the name of all real Christians.

Yes, you are ranting and having a tantrum because you lost.

Yes, you lost because I ALREADY SAID I WAS WILLING TO CONCEDE I COULD BE WRONG YOU WANT HARD EVIDENCE THAT GOD EXISTS.

BUT ARE YOU WILLING TO CONCEDE THAT MEANS YOU DENY GOD BASED ON FAITH????????

You can't have it both ways. You either do or don't!

That's why you are reduced to this tantrum, wailing and name calling.

Liar

Hypocrite

False Christian.

I am surprised your god hasn't struck you with lightning.......oh wait.....

 

[Hollie]

My next guss

Your OP was a smokescreen for ID'iot creationism. You follow a long line of hyper-religious loons who offered the same frantic tirades.

Um, no there is no smoke screen.

A) There is no hard evidence for God.

B) There is no hard evidence for how life began.

How is that a smoke screen?

It's very factual and out front.

If you can disprove those FACTS do let me know.

Until then you are just irritated that means you cannot DISCOUNT Creationism.

I actually can discount ID'iot creationism in the same way I discount all appeals to fear and ignorance.

Then you are proving it is YOU giving into fear and ignorance, because you HAVE YET TO PRODUCE FACT.

If there is more evidence for one theory than another, then PRODUCE IT.

Otherwise, to dismiss a theory sans evidence, isn't science, it's bias.

ID'iot creationism is not a theory. It's a religious claim tied to christian fundamentalists.

So actually, it is you who had not produced facts.

Let go of fear and ignorance. You will thank me when you do.

It's not a theory BASED ON WHAT HARD FACT?

You LABELING it, isn't FACT OR EVIDENCE.

Give me the FACTS.

Simply labeling it as religion has no more validity than if I were to say the primordial pool theory is nothing more than "Godless atheism."

Wonderful way to dismiss something based on one's own biases and prejudices but damn lacking in EVIDENCE AND FACT.

Sorry but you can keep repeating that, and I'm sure it will console you, but it won't carry a debate.

What debate? There's nothing to debate because you have no argument.

 

[teapartysamurai]

I told you it was easy to defeat atheists.

I don't know why so many Christians are afraid to do so.

Wow, I told you these guys would just twist themselves into pretzels.

This is usually the last part of the break down.

They are reduced to just shrieking insults to salve their bruised egos.

Sad, really!

This entire thread is nothing more than a tantrum- I am an atheist and I am more of a Christian than you are.

You are a liar

And a hypocrite

And a false Christian

I think Syriusly has had a mental breakdown.

All he can do is throw a tantrum and repeat the same thing.

I told you guys it isn't hard to beat atheists.

I don't know why some Christians are intimidated by it.

I staged this thread for that reason. To show Christians there's nothing to it.

I've done it so many times.

Once again- Show me where I have demanded hard evidence for God?

So far all you have done in this thread is rant about atheists- clearly you have some issue with persons who don't believe in your god- but that doesn't justify lying about me.

Because I am an atheist. And your OP accused me of hypocrisy.

So prove it.

And you can't.

Just a liar

And a hypocrite

And a blemish on the name of all real Christians.

Yes, you are ranting and having a tantrum because you lost.

Yes, you lost because I ALREADY SAID I WAS WILLING TO CONCEDE I COULD BE WRONG YOU WANT HARD EVIDENCE THAT GOD EXISTS.

BUT ARE YOU WILLING TO CONCEDE THAT MEANS YOU DENY GOD BASED ON FAITH????????

You can't have it both ways. You either do or don't!

That's why you are reduced to this tantrum, wailing and name calling.

Liar

Hypocrite

False Christian.

I am surprised your god hasn't struck you with lightning.......oh wait.....

The sad part is he thinks he's helping his side instead of proving my op.

 

[teapartysamurai]

My next guss

Um, no there is no smoke screen.

A) There is no hard evidence for God.

B) There is no hard evidence for how life began.

How is that a smoke screen?

It's very factual and out front.

If you can disprove those FACTS do let me know.

Until then you are just irritated that means you cannot DISCOUNT Creationism.

I actually can discount ID'iot creationism in the same way I discount all appeals to fear and ignorance.

Then you are proving it is YOU giving into fear and ignorance, because you HAVE YET TO PRODUCE FACT.

If there is more evidence for one theory than another, then PRODUCE IT.

Otherwise, to dismiss a theory sans evidence, isn't science, it's bias.

ID'iot creationism is not a theory. It's a religious claim tied to christian fundamentalists.

So actually, it is you who had not produced facts.

Let go of fear and ignorance. You will thank me when you do.

It's not a theory BASED ON WHAT HARD FACT?

You LABELING it, isn't FACT OR EVIDENCE.

Give me the FACTS.

Simply labeling it as religion has no more validity than if I were to say the primordial pool theory is nothing more than "Godless atheism."

Wonderful way to dismiss something based on one's own biases and prejudices but damn lacking in EVIDENCE AND FACT.

Sorry but you can keep repeating that, and I'm sure it will console you, but it won't carry a debate.

What debate? There's nothing to debate because you have no argument.

No it is YOU that has no argument.

My argument is presented in the op, quite clearly.

A) There is no evidence for God.

B) There is no evidence for how life began.

If you then dismiss Creationism it is based on bias and NOT FACT.

When you can produce fact and not just labels, let me know.

 

[Derideo_Te]

I used an example to point out the fallacy of your position. That you either failed to comprehend the example or are just being disingenuous and deflecting because you cannot refute that you lack the basics of honesty and integrity is largely irrelevant at this juncture.

You have successfully managed to destroy your own credibility. Congratulations, you must be so proud of yourself for being the opposite of a Christian in every way that it actually matters.

But you DIDN'T prove a fallacy.

All you did was back up my first argument.

There's NO HARD EVIDENCE.

That's not a fallacy.

Try again!

Lying about what I posted does not refute the facts.

But I didn't lie.

You said you proved I posted a fallacy.

But as I pointed out you did not.

If you can refute that then do so.

Just calling me a liar sounds desperate on your part.

You are a hole for yourself now.

Would you like another shovel?

Then why is it you reduced to emoticons and snarky retreats?

Don't flatter yourself that you deserve anything more.

You were provided with factual links and hard evidence.

You never read a single one of them.

You cannot refute a single one of the facts provided.

You have reduced yourself to a sniveling whiner with zero credibility.

Best of all you did this all to yourself and therefore have no one else but yourself to blame for your current predicament.

Have a nice day.

 

[Hollie]

My next guss

I actually can discount ID'iot creationism in the same way I discount all appeals to fear and ignorance.

Then you are proving it is YOU giving into fear and ignorance, because you HAVE YET TO PRODUCE FACT.

If there is more evidence for one theory than another, then PRODUCE IT.

Otherwise, to dismiss a theory sans evidence, isn't science, it's bias.

ID'iot creationism is not a theory. It's a religious claim tied to christian fundamentalists.

So actually, it is you who had not produced facts.

Let go of fear and ignorance. You will thank me when you do.

It's not a theory BASED ON WHAT HARD FACT?

You LABELING it, isn't FACT OR EVIDENCE.

Give me the FACTS.

Simply labeling it as religion has no more validity than if I were to say the primordial pool theory is nothing more than "Godless atheism."

Wonderful way to dismiss something based on one's own biases and prejudices but damn lacking in EVIDENCE AND FACT.

Sorry but you can keep repeating that, and I'm sure it will console you, but it won't carry a debate.

What debate? There's nothing to debate because you have no argument.

No it is YOU that has no argument.

My argument is presented in the op, quite clearly.

A) There is no evidence for God.

B) There is no evidence for how life began.

If you then dismiss Creationism it is based on bias and NOT FACT.

When you can produce fact and not just labels, let me know.

Christian fundie dogma under the burqa of ID'iot creationism is not an argument.

Let go of the fear and ignorance that clouds your mind.

 

[teapartysamurai]

you cannot DISCOUNT Creationism.

Creationism was debunked as religious BS by the Dover case where a conservative judge appointed by Bush sr ruled that there was no factual basis for it whatsoever and that it is simply an illegal attempt to impose religious beliefs in science classrooms.

Let me get this straight. A JUDICIAL JUDGE DECIDES WHAT IS SCIENCE????????????

Is that what you are reduced to. Saying a LEGAL case decides science?????????

That's pretty desperate!

The judge made a determination that creationism is NOT science because it fails to conform to the scientific method.

Once again you display your appalling home schooled ignorance.

A JUDGE decided, not a SCIENTIST!

ARE WE GOING THERE?

So when a JUDGE decided that Blacks were not citizens that made it true? (Dredd Scot)

I'm sure there are a LOT of decisions by judges you would not agree with.

But this one has "validity" simply because you agree with it?

Would you please explain in what "peer reviewed" science a judges decision is the final word?

 

[Syriusly]

I told you it was easy to defeat atheists.

I don't know why so many Christians are afraid to do so.

This entire thread is nothing more than a tantrum- I am an atheist and I am more of a Christian than you are.

You are a liar

And a hypocrite

And a false Christian

I think Syriusly has had a mental breakdown.

All he can do is throw a tantrum and repeat the same thing.

I told you guys it isn't hard to beat atheists.

I don't know why some Christians are intimidated by it.

I staged this thread for that reason. To show Christians there's nothing to it.

I've done it so many times.

Once again- Show me where I have demanded hard evidence for God?

So far all you have done in this thread is rant about atheists- clearly you have some issue with persons who don't believe in your god- but that doesn't justify lying about me.

Because I am an atheist. And your OP accused me of hypocrisy.

So prove it.

And you can't.

Just a liar

And a hypocrite

And a blemish on the name of all real Christians.

Yes, you are ranting and having a tantrum because you lost.

Yes, you lost because I ALREADY SAID I WAS WILLING TO CONCEDE I COULD BE WRONG YOU WANT HARD EVIDENCE THAT GOD EXISTS.

BUT ARE YOU WILLING TO CONCEDE THAT MEANS YOU DENY GOD BASED ON FAITH????????

You can't have it both ways. You either do or don't!

That's why you are reduced to this tantrum, wailing and name calling.

Liar

Hypocrite

False Christian.

I am surprised your god hasn't struck you with lightning.......oh wait.....

The sad part is he thinks he's helping his side instead of proving my op.

Liar

Hypocrite

False Christian.

 

[teapartysamurai]

But you DIDN'T prove a fallacy.

All you did was back up my first argument.

There's NO HARD EVIDENCE.

That's not a fallacy.

Try again!

Lying about what I posted does not refute the facts.

But I didn't lie.

You said you proved I posted a fallacy.

But as I pointed out you did not.

If you can refute that then do so.

Just calling me a liar sounds desperate on your part.

You are a hole for yourself now.

Would you like another shovel?

Then why is it you reduced to emoticons and snarky retreats?

Don't flatter yourself that you deserve anything more.

You were provided with factual links and hard evidence.

You never read a single one of them.

You cannot refute a single one of the facts provided.

You have reduced yourself to a sniveling whiner with zero credibility.

Best of all you did this all to yourself and therefore have no one else but yourself to blame for your current predicament.

Have a nice day.

Um, no you presented a table of what elements are contained in space that could contribute to life.

I replied that that SUGGESTS life could be elsewhere but it isn't HARD EVIDENCE life is elsewhere.

Plus I also pointed out the same chart could SUGGEST the existence of God, since how did those elements get there in the first place?

You are now reduced to Now insisting I accept that table, as if I hadn't already refuted it.

It's not hard evidence.

 

[teapartysamurai]

I told you it was easy to defeat atheists.

I don't know why so many Christians are afraid to do so.
I think Syriusly has had a mental breakdown.

All he can do is throw a tantrum and repeat the same thing.

I told you guys it isn't hard to beat atheists.

I don't know why some Christians are intimidated by it.

I staged this thread for that reason. To show Christians there's nothing to it.

I've done it so many times.

Once again- Show me where I have demanded hard evidence for God?

So far all you have done in this thread is rant about atheists- clearly you have some issue with persons who don't believe in your god- but that doesn't justify lying about me.

Because I am an atheist. And your OP accused me of hypocrisy.

So prove it.

And you can't.

Just a liar

And a hypocrite

And a blemish on the name of all real Christians.

Yes, you are ranting and having a tantrum because you lost.

Yes, you lost because I ALREADY SAID I WAS WILLING TO CONCEDE I COULD BE WRONG YOU WANT HARD EVIDENCE THAT GOD EXISTS.

BUT ARE YOU WILLING TO CONCEDE THAT MEANS YOU DENY GOD BASED ON FAITH????????

You can't have it both ways. You either do or don't!

That's why you are reduced to this tantrum, wailing and name calling.

Liar

Hypocrite

False Christian.

I am surprised your god hasn't struck you with lightning.......oh wait.....

The sad part is he thinks he's helping his side instead of proving my op.

Liar

Hypocrite

False Christian.

See I told you atheists are arrogant!

Why am I a "False Christian?"

Because I DARED defeat my "betters" the atheists!

 

[Syriusly]

My next guss

I actually can discount ID'iot creationism in the same way I discount all appeals to fear and ignorance.

Then you are proving it is YOU giving into fear and ignorance, because you HAVE YET TO PRODUCE FACT.

If there is more evidence for one theory than another, then PRODUCE IT.

Otherwise, to dismiss a theory sans evidence, isn't science, it's bias.

ID'iot creationism is not a theory. It's a religious claim tied to christian fundamentalists.

So actually, it is you who had not produced facts.

Let go of fear and ignorance. You will thank me when you do.

It's not a theory BASED ON WHAT HARD FACT?

You LABELING it, isn't FACT OR EVIDENCE.

Give me the FACTS.

Simply labeling it as religion has no more validity than if I were to say the primordial pool theory is nothing more than "Godless atheism."

Wonderful way to dismiss something based on one's own biases and prejudices but damn lacking in EVIDENCE AND FACT.

Sorry but you can keep repeating that, and I'm sure it will console you, but it won't carry a debate.

What debate? There's nothing to debate because you have no argument.

No it is YOU that has no argument.

My argument is presented in the op, quite clearly.

A) There is no evidence for God.

B) There is no evidence for how life began.

If you then dismiss Creationism it is based on bias and NOT FACT.

When you can produce fact and not just labels, let me know.

And none of that has anything to do with atheism.

 

[Syriusly]

Once again- Show me where I have demanded hard evidence for God?

So far all you have done in this thread is rant about atheists- clearly you have some issue with persons who don't believe in your god- but that doesn't justify lying about me.

Because I am an atheist. And your OP accused me of hypocrisy.

So prove it.

And you can't.

Just a liar

And a hypocrite

And a blemish on the name of all real Christians.

Yes, you are ranting and having a tantrum because you lost.

Yes, you lost because I ALREADY SAID I WAS WILLING TO CONCEDE I COULD BE WRONG YOU WANT HARD EVIDENCE THAT GOD EXISTS.

BUT ARE YOU WILLING TO CONCEDE THAT MEANS YOU DENY GOD BASED ON FAITH????????

You can't have it both ways. You either do or don't!

That's why you are reduced to this tantrum, wailing and name calling.

Liar

Hypocrite

False Christian.

I am surprised your god hasn't struck you with lightning.......oh wait.....

The sad part is he thinks he's helping his side instead of proving my op.

Liar

Hypocrite

False Christian.

See I told you atheists are arrogant!

Why am I a "False Christian?"

Because I DARED defeat my "betters" the atheists!

Liar

Hypocrite

False Christian

Whoever of you loves life and desires to see many good days, keep your tongue from evil and your lips from speaking lies. Psalm 34:12-13

 

[teapartysamurai]

My next guss
Then you are proving it is YOU giving into fear and ignorance, because you HAVE YET TO PRODUCE FACT.

If there is more evidence for one theory than another, then PRODUCE IT.

Otherwise, to dismiss a theory sans evidence, isn't science, it's bias.

ID'iot creationism is not a theory. It's a religious claim tied to christian fundamentalists.

So actually, it is you who had not produced facts.

Let go of fear and ignorance. You will thank me when you do.

It's not a theory BASED ON WHAT HARD FACT?

You LABELING it, isn't FACT OR EVIDENCE.

Give me the FACTS.

Simply labeling it as religion has no more validity than if I were to say the primordial pool theory is nothing more than "Godless atheism."

Wonderful way to dismiss something based on one's own biases and prejudices but damn lacking in EVIDENCE AND FACT.

Sorry but you can keep repeating that, and I'm sure it will console you, but it won't carry a debate.

What debate? There's nothing to debate because you have no argument.

No it is YOU that has no argument.

My argument is presented in the op, quite clearly.

A) There is no evidence for God.

B) There is no evidence for how life began.

If you then dismiss Creationism it is based on bias and NOT FACT.

When you can produce fact and not just labels, let me know.

And none of that has anything to do with atheism.

Why then are you here?

It obviously has SOMETHING to do with it, or you wouldn't have spent the last hour arguing with me.

If it has nothing to do with atheism are you ready to concede that Creationism has the same validity as other origins of how life began.

I mean if it has NOTHING to with atheism what skin would it be off your nose to admit that.

My guess is you'd rather eat hot nails than do that.

 

[teapartysamurai]

Yes, you are ranting and having a tantrum because you lost.

Yes, you lost because I ALREADY SAID I WAS WILLING TO CONCEDE I COULD BE WRONG YOU WANT HARD EVIDENCE THAT GOD EXISTS.

BUT ARE YOU WILLING TO CONCEDE THAT MEANS YOU DENY GOD BASED ON FAITH????????

You can't have it both ways. You either do or don't!

That's why you are reduced to this tantrum, wailing and name calling.

Liar

Hypocrite

False Christian.

I am surprised your god hasn't struck you with lightning.......oh wait.....

The sad part is he thinks he's helping his side instead of proving my op.

Liar

Hypocrite

False Christian.

See I told you atheists are arrogant!

Why am I a "False Christian?"

Because I DARED defeat my "betters" the atheists!

Liar

Hypocrite

False Christian

Whoever of you loves life and desires to see many good days, keep your tongue from evil and your lips from speaking lies. Psalm 34:12-13

And if I'm lying why are you the one reduced to a three line tantrum?