The inept and corrupt federal government

I didn't say that, they submitted the information to the IRS, the IRS targeted them based on nothing but the name. Nothing illegal in the application was found. The IRS delayed their process purposely because of apparent political affiliation. They were targeted and profiled base solely on politics. It is wrong. You are a phony liberal. Real liberals would never have put up with this.

Well, yes, their NAME indicated that they weren't what they said they were.

Their NAME indicated their intention to spend money on political activity, which is NOT what that sort of exemption is in the tax code for.

You kind of like when an organization calls itself the North American Man-Boy Love Association, we might have some suspicion they are up to no good.

You had no clue or evidence what they were or were not doing, and it wasn't the fact that they were denied, but they were delayed for years without getting due process. Spin it all you want but the IRS was in trouble for it and they weren't allowed to delay for no reason. And several IRS servants were let go.
I hope that when Trump becomes president he investigates the whole thing and cleans out the stables. At least 1/3 of these IRS personnel deserved to get canned. Louis Lerner should be in prison.
 
Nope... matter of law. He ruled, correctly, the SCOTUS had no standing to intercede in a matter of state law.

Except that a majority of his colleagues disagreed with him, but that wasn't the point.

The point was, he thought it was perfectly okay to execute a person who was innocent as long as they went through the process.

That's ten kinds of fucked up and makes him sort of a horrible human being. I mean on top of the other things that made him a horrible human being.
 
IMG_1862.JPG
 
Nope... matter of law. He ruled, correctly, the SCOTUS had no standing to intercede in a matter of state law.

Except that a majority of his colleagues disagreed with him, but that wasn't the point.

The point was, he thought it was perfectly okay to execute a person who was innocent as long as they went through the process.

That's ten kinds of fucked up and makes him sort of a horrible human being. I mean on top of the other things that made him a horrible human being.

No, it makes him an excellent judge... he followed the law, that's his job. If you believe it his job to impose his morality, then don't get pissed when a judge ignores the law and imposes his morality, a morality that you don't agree with.
 
The Clinton's do NOT fuck around with their corruption. It's in your face and they DARE you to try to do anything about it.

Nixon was the most evil man who ever lived because he erased some incriminating audiotapes.

That shit is laughable by the Clinton standard of corruption.
 
Thomas Jefferson was in Paris as the framers wrote the Constitution, and Paris was becoming the beacon of the enlightenment period.
Is there a point here? Thomas Jefferson personally penned the Declaration of Independence and he was one of the most respected legal and political minds of that era (if not thee most respected). His protege James Madison did help pen the Constitution and Jefferson's vision and structure for government were well represented and implemented.
 
No, it makes him an excellent judge... he followed the law, that's his job. If you believe it his job to impose his morality, then don't get pissed when a judge ignores the law and imposes his morality, a morality that you don't agree with.

I thought not murdering innocent people was everyone's morality. Except Tony the Big Tuna Scalia, that is.
 
Thomas Jefferson was in Paris as the framers wrote the Constitution, and Paris was becoming the beacon of the enlightenment period.
Is there a point here? Thomas Jefferson personally penned the Declaration of Independence and he was one of the most respected legal and political minds of that era (if not thee most respected). His protege James Madison did help pen the Constitution and Jefferson's vision and structure for government were well represented and implemented.
So is Jefferson considered a liberal?
 
Thomas Jefferson was in Paris as the framers wrote the Constitution, and Paris was becoming the beacon of the enlightenment period.
Is there a point here? Thomas Jefferson personally penned the Declaration of Independence and he was one of the most respected legal and political minds of that era (if not thee most respected). His protege James Madison did help pen the Constitution and Jefferson's vision and structure for government were well represented and implemented.
So is Jefferson considered a liberal?
So you admit that you're a progressive because you are fiercely racists and progressives are the ideology of racism?
 
No, it makes him an excellent judge... he followed the law, that's his job. If you believe it his job to impose his morality, then don't get pissed when a judge ignores the law and imposes his morality, a morality that you don't agree with.

I thought not murdering innocent people was everyone's morality. Except Tony the Big Tuna Scalia, that is.

Then do away with legislatures and just let's be ruled by appointed judges. But like I said, don't get mad when we start jailing people for the immorality of murdering innocent babies because this is just what you are advocating.
 
Thomas Jefferson was in Paris as the framers wrote the Constitution, and Paris was becoming the beacon of the enlightenment period.
Is there a point here? Thomas Jefferson personally penned the Declaration of Independence and he was one of the most respected legal and political minds of that era (if not thee most respected). His protege James Madison did help pen the Constitution and Jefferson's vision and structure for government were well represented and implemented.
So is Jefferson considered a liberal?
So you admit that you're a progressive because you are fiercely racists and progressives are the ideology of racism?

He doesn't understand that progressivism and liberalism are miles apart. Actually, classic liberals are closer to conservatives... keeping government out of the affairs of the individual, individual freedoms, etc.
 
Thomas Jefferson was in Paris as the framers wrote the Constitution, and Paris was becoming the beacon of the enlightenment period.
Is there a point here? Thomas Jefferson personally penned the Declaration of Independence and he was one of the most respected legal and political minds of that era (if not thee most respected). His protege James Madison did help pen the Constitution and Jefferson's vision and structure for government were well represented and implemented.
So is Jefferson considered a liberal?
So you admit that you're a progressive because you are fiercely racists and progressives are the ideology of racism?

He doesn't understand that progressivism and liberalism are miles apart. Actually, classic liberals are closer to conservatives... keeping government out of the affairs of the individual, individual freedoms, etc.
Exactly. And what an immature response. I'm essentially talking about the TCP/IP protocol and he responds with "so you admit that hydrogen is not flammable". Uh....what?!? I said no such thing and we weren't even on that topic. So bizarre.
 
Then do away with legislatures and just let's be ruled by appointed judges. But like I said, don't get mad when we start jailing people for the immorality of murdering innocent babies because this is just what you are advocating.

not at all, but I totally understand how badly you need to change the subject.

Big difference between jailing someone AFTER it happens and keeping something that shouldn't happen from happening.
 
Ineptitude:

Just like every progressive program in history, conservatives warned against it and accurately predicted exactly what would happen. Social Security (like all unconstitutional progressive programs) was always unsustainable. But that reality was exacerbated by a corrupt federal government which raided the Social Security fund like it was their own personal piggy bank.

Projections Differ, but Social Security Is in Deep Trouble
 
Ineptitude:

Just like every progressive program in history, conservatives warned against it and accurately predicted exactly what would happen. Social Security (like all unconstitutional progressive programs) was always unsustainable. But that reality was exacerbated by a corrupt federal government which raided the Social Security fund like it was their own personal piggy bank.

Projections Differ, but Social Security Is in Deep Trouble
If Social Security is not sustainable; and it didn't lead to America going communistic as Republicans predicted, and Bush and the Republicans could not privatize it, America might just be stuck with it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top