LittleNipper
Gold Member
- Jan 3, 2013
- 5,613
- 839
- 130
The eyewitnesses all seem to have been related or friends, and not some unbiased notary public.
And yet, they exist.
And there is reason not to consider them honest. If the eyewitnesses had nothing to gain, nothing to lose, and were indifferent, then what they claimed might be acceptable. But then is the issue of character. Are they known to be truthful or have they been caught in twisting the truth in the past..?
Last edited: