WinterBorn
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2011
- 57,725
- 23,814
LOL the observation that the universe is expanding has led scientist to an impasse because the expansion is both faster than light and faster than gravity can create, so they invented dark matter. Simplified the universe can not even be proved to exist mathematically. So according to science the universe is not realThere is no science based answer as to what the universe is, all science can do is observe. The answer is not knowable from humanities current position on EarthThere is nothing wrong with the question, the problem rest with the sanity of the people who claim to knowWhere the universe came from is a silly question when humanity still has no idea what the universe isActually the latter is quite possible as if the universe was not here then it must have been created by some means. Not meaning God either but something has to come from somewhereThere are only two possibilities and these possibilities have been debated since man first became aware; the universe began or the universe has always existed.The universe can not actually have a beginning, perhaps the current phase that we are in had a beginning but the matter always had to exist.I see no reason why creation, meaning the beginning of the universe, is something humanity can never understand.ExactlyKnowing that a dog's, or a chimpanzee's brain are made from the same stuff as a human brain isn't it reasonable to think that even the human brain has a limit as to what types of information is can process?
We cannot understand Creation and yet it happened
Looking at nature its obvious to me that there must be a Creator
We could not have come to exist though dumb luck as Darwin claims
Some higher intelligence must be responsible
I see nothing in nature that points to any creator. In any event, any creator implies a hierarchy of creators.
lastly, Darwin never made any claims to dumb luck about a force of nature. In fact, his theory proposed clearly identifiable circumstances that guided the evolution of species.
Or you can babble that everything just popped into existence because nothing wanted to make a universe.
That is pure non scientific babble
There is no scientific theory that the universe had a beginning.
I am not babbling that everything popped into existence. You are the one claiming scientists claim that. They don't.
The latter just isn't possible for a number of good reasons and the former has been proven through observations.
So you are claiming that the Universe came from nothing? Hmmmm
Most scientists believe in the Big Bang. And that the Universe has always existed.
I agree that it is a silly question. But many people seem obsessed with it.
I accept the science based answer. And, I say again, I do not believe that nothing created something. Which you claim means I am not an atheist, despite the fact I do not believe in God.
Actually, we can observe that the universe is expanding. And we can observe that the rate of expansion is slowing, however small the incremental slowing may be.
Apparently, what cannot be proven is your repeated claim that atheists believe nothing created something, and that anyone who does not believe nothing created something is not an atheist.
There is no science that proves your claim "Dude atheist means one does not believe in God and that everything came from nothing.". You don't seem to have a problem repeating it over and over.