Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
H.Res.183 - Condemning anti-Semitism as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contradictory to the values and aspirations that define the people of the United States and condemning anti-Muslim discrimination and bigotry against minorities as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contrary to the values and aspirations of the United States.Link itThey condemn it.Yes and few if any challenge their open antisemitism. So you will abstain. That is your right.It has Tlaib and Omar because they were voted in by their respective districts. Still, the party condemns anti-Semitism.It does? But it has Tlaib and Omar. So if Sanders is the nominee, you abstain?My party condemns anti-Semitism. As far as Sanders, I can't stand him and won't vote for him in the general, should he make it, for a variety of reasons.
As far as abstaining, I will likely vote 3rd party (depending on who is running), which has the same effect as abstaining.
LOLWhatever. You knew what I meant.LOLThat is what I meant by submit. Believe what you like. LOLNo, I don't know you meant that nor would any sane person think you meant that since "submit" and "finalize" are not synonymous. One initiating a process and the other ending it. Seems more to me that you simply lack the character to admit to me that you're wrong.Why are you so obsessed with certain verbiage. By “submit” I meant have final say. And you knew that.LOLOLOLOL
Dumbfuck, you actually said... "He doesn't submit them [budgets]."
Now in the face of being proven dead wrong, you try to call me the dumbfuck,
I believe what you wrote before you tried to correct your idiocy.... "He doesn't submit them, he signs the budgets Congress submits."
It should have been a Censure on that terrorist Omar (If that IS her name)H.Res.183 - Condemning anti-Semitism as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contradictory to the values and aspirations that define the people of the United States and condemning anti-Muslim discrimination and bigotry against minorities as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contrary to the values and aspirations of the United States.Link itThey condemn it.Yes and few if any challenge their open antisemitism. So you will abstain. That is your right.It has Tlaib and Omar because they were voted in by their respective districts. Still, the party condemns anti-Semitism.It does? But it has Tlaib and Omar. So if Sanders is the nominee, you abstain?
As far as abstaining, I will likely vote 3rd party (depending on who is running), which has the same effect as abstaining.
Yea/Nay
Democrats: 234/0
Republicans: 173/23
Yep...they just refused to call out those specifically who are antisemites and masked it as an outrage over all of racism.H.Res.183 - Condemning anti-Semitism as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contradictory to the values and aspirations that define the people of the United States and condemning anti-Muslim discrimination and bigotry against minorities as hateful expressions of intolerance that are contrary to the values and aspirations of the United States.Link itThey condemn it.Yes and few if any challenge their open antisemitism. So you will abstain. That is your right.It has Tlaib and Omar because they were voted in by their respective districts. Still, the party condemns anti-Semitism.It does? But it has Tlaib and Omar. So if Sanders is the nominee, you abstain?
As far as abstaining, I will likely vote 3rd party (depending on who is running), which has the same effect as abstaining.
Yea/Nay
Democrats: 234/0
Republicans: 173/23
He has to agree to it. Does he not and sign it.LOLWhatever. You knew what I meant.LOLThat is what I meant by submit. Believe what you like. LOLNo, I don't know you meant that nor would any sane person think you meant that since "submit" and "finalize" are not synonymous. One initiating a process and the other ending it. Seems more to me that you simply lack the character to admit to me that you're wrong.Why are you so obsessed with certain verbiage. By “submit” I meant have final say. And you knew that.
I believe what you wrote before you tried to correct your idiocy.... "He doesn't submit them, he signs the budgets Congress submits."
I know you meant what you said...
"He doesn't submit them, he signs the budgets Congress submits."
You even said the president signs the budget after the Congress submits it. The president submits it before the Congress ever votes on it.
LOLHe has to agree to it. Does he not and sign it.LOLWhatever. You knew what I meant.LOLThat is what I meant by submit. Believe what you like. LOLNo, I don't know you meant that nor would any sane person think you meant that since "submit" and "finalize" are not synonymous. One initiating a process and the other ending it. Seems more to me that you simply lack the character to admit to me that you're wrong.
I believe what you wrote before you tried to correct your idiocy.... "He doesn't submit them, he signs the budgets Congress submits."
I know you meant what you said...
"He doesn't submit them, he signs the budgets Congress submits."
You even said the president signs the budget after the Congress submits it. The president submits it before the Congress ever votes on it.
He can veto it. Google it.LOLHe has to agree to it. Does he not and sign it.LOLWhatever. You knew what I meant.LOLThat is what I meant by submit. Believe what you like. LOL
I believe what you wrote before you tried to correct your idiocy.... "He doesn't submit them, he signs the budgets Congress submits."
I know you meant what you said...
"He doesn't submit them, he signs the budgets Congress submits."
You even said the president signs the budget after the Congress submits it. The president submits it before the Congress ever votes on it.
No, he does not have to agree to it.
You're batting 0.000 on this issue. You should just go back to the dugout and sit quietly on the bench about this.
The debt is due to the tax cuts and excessive military spending, and we know the military spending is excessive because Tramp is stealing billions from it to pay for his "Mexico will pay for it" wall.The debt is due to entitlements. The spend there is out of control and interest expense is higher as rates are not at the floor. Our income is actually higher despite the tax cuts but spending is also way higher. No president can attack entitlements in their first term but the 2nd term is fair game. If Trump wins and doesn’t fix the deficit then I will agree with you.And yet with all that and the increase in debt on top of it, Tramp's "recovery" from the Obama recovery was SLOWER than Obama's recovery from the Great BUSH Recession shitstorm.But FASTER than Tramp's recovery from a recovery!!!!Eight years and the slowest recovery since WW2. Obama did not do a very good job.So Food stamp use increases from the Great BUSH Recession and Obama turns the tide of increases and Tramp takes the credit.
Nope. Trump just took what we had and put it on super speed by eliminating regulations and lowering the corp tax rate to halt corporate inversions. He also put in place the USMCA. You may dislike the man but he has been very good for the economy and most voters agree with that statement. Look up his approval rating on the economy alone.
The graph is fake when being used to claim WAGE EARNERS incomes have increased when the graph clearly includes capital gains income as well as wage income skewing the graph. You are deflecting because you were DISHONEST for introducing the fake graph into the argument!The graph is real and that 10% is not stagnant. Why can you not admit that?You can't admit your fake graph is skewed so all you can do is deflect.Again YOU lie with a half truth, even after I clearly pointed out that 50% of American households own some small amount of stock, but as the DATA proves that stock is NOT evenly distributed among the 50%, which was the key point of my post.I own stocks. I am far from “wealthy”. Many own stocks through IRAs and 401ks. The Leftist lies are comical. You’re a little liar too as over half of all Americans own stocks. Back to your troll cave.Now there is a FAKE graph from the lying scum at Freedom Works, no surprise there. Notice they put the post recession that peaked in near the end of 2010 at the beginning of 2009 to skew the graph.
And also notice the graph is NOT WAGES, but household income which includes income from STOCKS which are heavily concentrated with the wealthy even though 50% of Americans own at least some small amount of stock. A whopping 84 percent of all stocks owned by Americans belong to the wealthiest 10 percent of households. And that includes everyone’s stakes in pension plans, 401(k)’s and individual retirement accounts, as well as trust funds, mutual funds and college savings programs like 529 plans. Further skewing the graph!!!
What Percentage of Americans Owns Stock?
The part YOU deliberately ignored; A whopping 84 percent of all stocks owned by Americans belong to the wealthiest 10 percent of households.
That 10% moves, you know that right? It is not always the same people. We all have an opportunity to get into that 10% or 15% or 20%. Those people are not stagnant. In America everyone is born with equal rights. No one is born with equal opportunities. Such is life.
That scripted statement was 3 days later to try to walk back his Nazis are fine people.Actually YOU are the liar simply by the wayBecause when you say that Trump said that those people were "very fine people"
you are just lying.
you edit his quote dishonestly leaving out his "ON BOTH SIDES," if BOTH sides are very fine people he is saying that Nazi/White Nationalists are very fine people!!!
You are the one playing games with the quotes.
Full transcript: Donald Trump’s press conference defending the Charlottesville rally
Trump: ...You had people and i'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists. They should be condemned totally. You had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists."
The debt is due to the tax cuts and excessive military spending, and we know the military spending is excessive because Tramp is stealing billions from it to pay for his "Mexico will pay for it" wall.The debt is due to entitlements. The spend there is out of control and interest expense is higher as rates are not at the floor. Our income is actually higher despite the tax cuts but spending is also way higher. No president can attack entitlements in their first term but the 2nd term is fair game. If Trump wins and doesn’t fix the deficit then I will agree with you.And yet with all that and the increase in debt on top of it, Tramp's "recovery" from the Obama recovery was SLOWER than Obama's recovery from the Great BUSH Recession shitstorm.But FASTER than Tramp's recovery from a recovery!!!!Eight years and the slowest recovery since WW2. Obama did not do a very good job.
Nope. Trump just took what we had and put it on super speed by eliminating regulations and lowering the corp tax rate to halt corporate inversions. He also put in place the USMCA. You may dislike the man but he has been very good for the economy and most voters agree with that statement. Look up his approval rating on the economy alone.
Revenue is up only because the population is still growing creating more tax payers, which also creates more need for government spending to keep up with the growing population.
But you knew that already!
No you are confusing her with Tramp who DID support the march of the Nazis chanting "Jews will not replace us," calling them "very fine people."I said no such thing. Again ... I support their right to protest even when I don't agree with what they're protesting. left/right makes no difference.LOL so you’re OK with Jew haters on the Left but not Jew haters on the right? Hence I am an Independent.Liar. I support their right to protest. I don't support what they're protesting.Because it was a racist rally, promoted by racists and held by racists. There was no one else there on the right but racists. Saying there were very fine people on both sides equates the racists with the ones there protesting the racists.
You abhor that but you support this, that makes you a hypocrite:
View attachment 305084
View attachment 305085
View attachment 305086
So you support the march of the Nazis chanting "Jews will not replace us"?
That scripted statement was 3 days later to try to walk back his Nazis are fine people.Actually YOU are the liar simply by the wayBecause when you say that Trump said that those people were "very fine people"
you are just lying.
you edit his quote dishonestly leaving out his "ON BOTH SIDES," if BOTH sides are very fine people he is saying that Nazi/White Nationalists are very fine people!!!
You are the one playing games with the quotes.
Full transcript: Donald Trump’s press conference defending the Charlottesville rally
Trump: ...You had people and i'm not talking about the neo-Nazis and the white nationalists. They should be condemned totally. You had many people in that group other than neo-Nazis and white nationalists."
No you are confusing her with Tramp who DID support the march of the Nazis chanting "Jews will not replace us," calling them "very fine people."I said no such thing. Again ... I support their right to protest even when I don't agree with what they're protesting. left/right makes no difference.LOL so you’re OK with Jew haters on the Left but not Jew haters on the right? Hence I am an Independent.Liar. I support their right to protest. I don't support what they're protesting.You abhor that but you support this, that makes you a hypocrite:
View attachment 305084
View attachment 305085
View attachment 305086
So you support the march of the Nazis chanting "Jews will not replace us"?
But the entitlements did NOT increase enough to account for the increase in deficit! The doubling of the deficit was mainly due to tax cuts and increased military spending, without those two the growth in revenue from increased population would have covered the increase in entitlement spending due to the population increase.The debt is due to the tax cuts and excessive military spending, and we know the military spending is excessive because Tramp is stealing billions from it to pay for his "Mexico will pay for it" wall.The debt is due to entitlements. The spend there is out of control and interest expense is higher as rates are not at the floor. Our income is actually higher despite the tax cuts but spending is also way higher. No president can attack entitlements in their first term but the 2nd term is fair game. If Trump wins and doesn’t fix the deficit then I will agree with you.And yet with all that and the increase in debt on top of it, Tramp's "recovery" from the Obama recovery was SLOWER than Obama's recovery from the Great BUSH Recession shitstorm.But FASTER than Tramp's recovery from a recovery!!!!
Nope. Trump just took what we had and put it on super speed by eliminating regulations and lowering the corp tax rate to halt corporate inversions. He also put in place the USMCA. You may dislike the man but he has been very good for the economy and most voters agree with that statement. Look up his approval rating on the economy alone.
Revenue is up only because the population is still growing creating more tax payers, which also creates more need for government spending to keep up with the growing population.
But you knew that already!
The majority of the budget is entitlements, and has been for several years. And always will be, from now on.
But the entitlements did NOT increase enough to account for the increase in deficit! The doubling of the deficit was mainly due to tax cuts and increased military spending, without those two the growth in revenue from increased population would have covered the increase in entitlement spending due to the population increase.The debt is due to the tax cuts and excessive military spending, and we know the military spending is excessive because Tramp is stealing billions from it to pay for his "Mexico will pay for it" wall.The debt is due to entitlements. The spend there is out of control and interest expense is higher as rates are not at the floor. Our income is actually higher despite the tax cuts but spending is also way higher. No president can attack entitlements in their first term but the 2nd term is fair game. If Trump wins and doesn’t fix the deficit then I will agree with you.And yet with all that and the increase in debt on top of it, Tramp's "recovery" from the Obama recovery was SLOWER than Obama's recovery from the Great BUSH Recession shitstorm.Nope. Trump just took what we had and put it on super speed by eliminating regulations and lowering the corp tax rate to halt corporate inversions. He also put in place the USMCA. You may dislike the man but he has been very good for the economy and most voters agree with that statement. Look up his approval rating on the economy alone.
Revenue is up only because the population is still growing creating more tax payers, which also creates more need for government spending to keep up with the growing population.
But you knew that already!
The majority of the budget is entitlements, and has been for several years. And always will be, from now on.
More taxpayers? Are you sure? Baby Boomers are retiring at pretty high rates. Military spend is but a pittance compared to entitlements.The debt is due to the tax cuts and excessive military spending, and we know the military spending is excessive because Tramp is stealing billions from it to pay for his "Mexico will pay for it" wall.The debt is due to entitlements. The spend there is out of control and interest expense is higher as rates are not at the floor. Our income is actually higher despite the tax cuts but spending is also way higher. No president can attack entitlements in their first term but the 2nd term is fair game. If Trump wins and doesn’t fix the deficit then I will agree with you.And yet with all that and the increase in debt on top of it, Tramp's "recovery" from the Obama recovery was SLOWER than Obama's recovery from the Great BUSH Recession shitstorm.But FASTER than Tramp's recovery from a recovery!!!!Eight years and the slowest recovery since WW2. Obama did not do a very good job.
Nope. Trump just took what we had and put it on super speed by eliminating regulations and lowering the corp tax rate to halt corporate inversions. He also put in place the USMCA. You may dislike the man but he has been very good for the economy and most voters agree with that statement. Look up his approval rating on the economy alone.
Revenue is up only because the population is still growing creating more tax payers, which also creates more need for government spending to keep up with the growing population.
But you knew that already!
Capital Gains is income as well? Not sure why that should be excluded? Are capital gains not taxed?The graph is fake when being used to claim WAGE EARNERS incomes have increased when the graph clearly includes capital gains income as well as wage income skewing the graph. You are deflecting because you were DISHONEST for introducing the fake graph into the argument!The graph is real and that 10% is not stagnant. Why can you not admit that?You can't admit your fake graph is skewed so all you can do is deflect.Again YOU lie with a half truth, even after I clearly pointed out that 50% of American households own some small amount of stock, but as the DATA proves that stock is NOT evenly distributed among the 50%, which was the key point of my post.I own stocks. I am far from “wealthy”. Many own stocks through IRAs and 401ks. The Leftist lies are comical. You’re a little liar too as over half of all Americans own stocks. Back to your troll cave.
What Percentage of Americans Owns Stock?
The part YOU deliberately ignored; A whopping 84 percent of all stocks owned by Americans belong to the wealthiest 10 percent of households.
That 10% moves, you know that right? It is not always the same people. We all have an opportunity to get into that 10% or 15% or 20%. Those people are not stagnant. In America everyone is born with equal rights. No one is born with equal opportunities. Such is life.
Why can't YOU admit that?????
That never happened. Another lie by Ed.No you are confusing her with Tramp who DID support the march of the Nazis chanting "Jews will not replace us," calling them "very fine people."I said no such thing. Again ... I support their right to protest even when I don't agree with what they're protesting. left/right makes no difference.LOL so you’re OK with Jew haters on the Left but not Jew haters on the right? Hence I am an Independent.Liar. I support their right to protest. I don't support what they're protesting.You abhor that but you support this, that makes you a hypocrite:
View attachment 305084
View attachment 305085
View attachment 305086
So you support the march of the Nazis chanting "Jews will not replace us"?
