Billy000
Democratic Socialist
- Nov 10, 2011
- 32,087
- 12,836
- Thread starter
- #121
Okay I need some clarification on this. In your opinion, how much of the negative coverage is Trump’s own fault?He did a shit job. Did he mention the study excludes neutral stories?Your source is Byron York. He is biased and untrustworthy.
A Harvard study is biased and untrustworthy?
You didn't link to a Harvard study, you linked to Byron York talking about a Harvard study. Byron York is biased and untrustworthy. Should I trust that he accurately conveyed the study findings?
He didn't opine on it. He listed the findings in the Harvard Study. Here is the link to the actual study, LOL.
https://research.hks.harvard.edu/publications/getFile.aspx?Id=1590
Here are some more links for you. Since you're still not convinced.
Anti-Trump Media? 92% Of Coverage Of His Presidency Is Negative: Study | Investor's Business Daily
A broadcast tradition: 90% of Trump coverage remains negative, study finds
Here's Undeniable Proof That the Media Despises Trump
Study: News Coverage Of Trump More Negative Than For Other Presidents
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...ent-network-trump-coverage-has-been-negative/
Broadcast news slams Trump with 96 percent negative coverage since impeachment inquiry began, study says
Who's to blame for negative Trump coverage?
Study Finds TV Networks Fixated on Negative Impeachment Coverage of Trump