Trump Is Hiding His Taxes

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Psst: guess what?? SO DO I !!!

lmao

Pssst: Bill Clinton CHEATED !!!!



Greg

Cool. Trump has one golfer who just happened to have already campaigned for him to say Clinton cheated. Nothing biased about that.

lmao

Greg

Trump's game is a lot like Kim from Korea. In one round, he made 11 holes in one.

LIAR!! He's a good player. Not GREAT but GOOD. Get over it you ditz!!

Greg

He cheats.

You lie. If he does cheat, which hurts people more, his cheating or your lying?

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

Alright, then the court could limit the tax returns to Trump time in office...

The Congress does not need anything before that.

why do you support him hiding them from us? What do you believe he is trying to hide?

You need many years of taxes, to actually understand the taxes....on someone like Trump or any billionaire, 6 years is about right....

what evidence do you have he is hiding anything?

He's afraid to show his tax returns ,will sue if anyone shows his grades Use the brains God gave you and figure out why the fear?

Fear or just playing a game costing Taxpayers money?

I say playing you fools for the fools you are.

The only thing you will discover if I am correct is he is not worth as much as he claims...

That is it...

let's hope so! If that is all that is found, it would make me feel more at ease with him!

I doubt that you would be at ease but the fact is Trump is someone I have been watching since the 1970's and let me ge clear Trump is a charlatan and hell he is dirty but nothing that will get him impeached.

Bush is more dangerous than Trump will ever dream of, well except with twatter rants...

 

[Bruce_T_Laney]

what evidence do you have he is hiding anything?

He's afraid to show his tax returns ,will sue if anyone shows his grades Use the brains God gave you and figure out why the fear?

Fear or just playing a game costing Taxpayers money?

I say playing you fools for the fools you are.

The only thing you will discover if I am correct is he is not worth as much as he claims...

That is it...

well we do know he paid taxes. that's about 95% of the charges from lefts.

He does?

Are you sure??

I heard he ate puppies for breakfast, cheat at rummy and plays Krampus during Christmas, so I say what you said is fake news...

I mean would the left ever lie or distort the facts to benefit them in the upcoming 2020 election when they walk on water and never told a lie!?!

unfortunately for them, Rachel Maddow fked them and provided the evidence on live tv. wow, I'm not sure why she's allowed to stay on air.

It is MSNBC, so does anyone really watch it?

 

[jc456]

He's afraid to show his tax returns ,will sue if anyone shows his grades Use the brains God gave you and figure out why the fear?

Fear or just playing a game costing Taxpayers money?

I say playing you fools for the fools you are.

The only thing you will discover if I am correct is he is not worth as much as he claims...

That is it...

well we do know he paid taxes. that's about 95% of the charges from lefts.

He does?

Are you sure??

I heard he ate puppies for breakfast, cheat at rummy and plays Krampus during Christmas, so I say what you said is fake news...

I mean would the left ever lie or distort the facts to benefit them in the upcoming 2020 election when they walk on water and never told a lie!?!

unfortunately for them, Rachel Maddow fked them and provided the evidence on live tv. wow, I'm not sure why she's allowed to stay on air.

It is MSNBC, so does anyone really watch it?

that day they did. then they went, what? wait, ah fk, got fked again by the fake media. and now they are gone again. But, i maintain, not sure how she is still on air.

 

[Care4all]

what evidence do you have he is hiding anything?

He's afraid to show his tax returns ,will sue if anyone shows his grades Use the brains God gave you and figure out why the fear?

Fear or just playing a game costing Taxpayers money?

I say playing you fools for the fools you are.

The only thing you will discover if I am correct is he is not worth as much as he claims...

That is it...

well we do know he paid taxes. that's about 95% of the charges from lefts.

He does?

Are you sure??

I heard he ate puppies for breakfast, cheat at rummy and plays Krampus during Christmas, so I say what you said is fake news...

I mean would the left ever lie or distort the facts to benefit them in the upcoming 2020 election when they walk on water and never told a lie!?!

unfortunately for them, Rachel Maddow fked them and provided the evidence on live tv. wow, I'm not sure why she's allowed to stay on air.

I'd hardly call a 13 year old PARTIAL tax return anything of importance, yep, Rachel did get stumped by Trump, who likely released the partial, dated, tax return....

 

[jc456]

He's afraid to show his tax returns ,will sue if anyone shows his grades Use the brains God gave you and figure out why the fear?

Fear or just playing a game costing Taxpayers money?

I say playing you fools for the fools you are.

The only thing you will discover if I am correct is he is not worth as much as he claims...

That is it...

well we do know he paid taxes. that's about 95% of the charges from lefts.

He does?

Are you sure??

I heard he ate puppies for breakfast, cheat at rummy and plays Krampus during Christmas, so I say what you said is fake news...

I mean would the left ever lie or distort the facts to benefit them in the upcoming 2020 election when they walk on water and never told a lie!?!

unfortunately for them, Rachel Maddow fked them and provided the evidence on live tv. wow, I'm not sure why she's allowed to stay on air.

I'd hardly call a 13 year old PARTIAL tax return anything of importance, yep, Rachel did get stumped by Trump, who likely released the partial, dated, tax return....

sure it is. It put to bed the notion that trump didn't pay his fair share. that was the original claim bubbette. And that one tax document however partial it was, said one very loud thing, Trump paid his fair share of tax. Period, end of the story bubbette.

 

[OKTexas]

Is It Worth It For Congress To Obtain Trump’s Tax Returns By Force?

"A person’s tax return is confidential.

"The Internal Revenue Service takes this very seriously as no one has leaked President Trump’s tax return to this day.

"However, Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code specifies certain instances where someone’s tax return must be disclosed.

"The section states that the IRS must provide anyone’s tax return to the chairman (and only to the chairman) of the House Ways And Means Committee upon request.

"The entire committee can review the tax return in a closed executive session away from the public.

"Section 6103 does not state that a House Ways And Means Committee member is authorized to release a tax return to the public.

" But it allows the committee to forward the returns to the full House or the Senate.

"Professor Andy Grewal stated that by voting to release the returns to the full House, the committee can effectively release the tax return to the public."

nope

nope

26 U.S. Code § 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information

"Disclosure to Committees of Congress
Secretary shall furnish such committee with any return or return information specified in such request, except that any return or return information which can be associated with, or otherwise identify, directly or indirectly, a particular taxpayer shall be furnished to such committee only when sitting in closed executive session unless such taxpayer otherwise consents in writing to such disclosure."

Why are law and order conservatives afraid of what Trump's tax returns will reveal?

Fishing expeditions are NOT a legitimate legislative purpose, the courts will tell them to pound sand.

.

Fishing expeditions are NOT a legitimate legislative purpose, the courts will tell them to pound sand.

"Congressional oversight is oversight by the United States Congress over the Executive Branch, including the numerous U.S. federal agencies.

"Congressional oversight includes the review, monitoring, and supervision of federal agencies, programs, activities, and policy implementation.[1]

"Congress exercises this power largely through its congressional committee system.

"Oversight also occurs in a wide variety of congressional activities and contexts.

"These include authorization, appropriations, investigative, and legislative hearings by standing committees; specialized investigations by select committees; and reviews and studies by congressional support agencies and staff."

Congressional oversight - Wikipedia

And? All your crap has no bearing on what I said.

.

 

[OKTexas]

And when the Democrats leak his tax returns, then do you support prison time for those that chose to violate a persons right to privacy.

think if they go for impeachment they can legally get his taxes

Wrong again commie, that's not a legitimate legislative end. And out of curiosity what possible impeachment charge would include the need for his taxes?

.

Wrong again commie, that's not a legitimate legislative end. And out of curiosity what possible impeachment charge would include the need for his taxes?

Tax fraud and money laundering charges for starters.

How to Make Trump's Tax Returns Public | DCReport.org

"On June 14, the New York State attorney general, Barbara Underwood, filed a civil complaint against President Trump and his three oldest children, accusing them of 'persistently illegal conduct' in using the Donald J. Trump Foundation as ''ittle more than a checkbook for payments from Mr. Trump or his businesses to nonprofits, regardless of their purpose or legality.'

Ms. Underwood believes there is abundant evidence to bring criminal charges against Mr. Trump as well.

"She made that position very clear in the letters she sent to the Internal Revenue Service and the Federal Election Commission in Washington recommending 'further investigation and legal action.'"

You might as well argue Trump never lies as contend he doesn't cheat on taxes and launder money for rich Russians.

You seem to be confused, congress is NOT a law enforcement agency, they have no constitutional authority to act as one. If you think Mueller hasn't already looked at these things, you're kidding yourself.

.

You seem to be confused, congress is NOT a law enforcement agency, they have no constitutional authority to act as one. If you think Mueller hasn't already looked at these things, you're kidding yourself.

We won't know what Mueller looked at until Republican hack Bill Barr releases the report.

Congress has all the constitutional authority it needs to investigate the "Red Don's" alleged tax fraud and money laundering.

Congressional oversight - Wikipedia

"Oversight, as an outgrowth of this principle, ideally serves a number of overlapping objectives and purposes:

• improve the efficiency, economy, and effectiveness of governmental operations;
• evaluate programs and performance;
• detect and prevent poor administration, waste, abuse, arbitrary and capricious behavior, or illegal and unconstitutional conduct;
• protect civil liberties and constitutional rights;
• inform the general public and ensure that executive policies reflect the public interest;
• gather information to develop new legislative proposals or to amend existing statutes;
• ensure administrative compliance with legislative intent; and
• prevent executive encroachment on legislative authority and prerogatives.

"In sum, oversight is a way for Congress to check on, and check, the executived directors."

Funny how only republican administration officials are hacks for their party, if you commies didn't have your hypocrisy and double standards you'd have nothing at all.

.

 

[Care4all]

why do you support him hiding them from us? What do you believe he is trying to hide?

You need many years of taxes, to actually understand the taxes....on someone like Trump or any billionaire, 6 years is about right....

what evidence do you have he is hiding anything?

He's afraid to show his tax returns ,will sue if anyone shows his grades Use the brains God gave you and figure out why the fear?

Fear or just playing a game costing Taxpayers money?

I say playing you fools for the fools you are.

The only thing you will discover if I am correct is he is not worth as much as he claims...

That is it...

let's hope so! If that is all that is found, it would make me feel more at ease with him!

I doubt that you would be at ease but the fact is Trump is someone I have been watching since the 1970's and let me ge clear Trump is a charlatan and hell he is dirty but nothing that will get him impeached.

Bush is more dangerous than Trump will ever dream of, well except with twatter rants...

it would ease concerns on him having foreign nation business allegiances over what's best for the country.... but yeah, he's all those other things too...

I was a kid, living in NYC (Brooklyn) when I first began watching and following him, with Trump Tower opening and during his divorce from Ivana and affair with Marla, MY grandparents still lived there, so I still followed him, and we were in South Jersey on the shore when he opened his casino in Atlantic city.... so, I've followed him, for quite a few decades now.... I knew he was a dick face/ a-hole, long ago,(still got a lot of laughs out of him during that period) but I had no idea, he was this much of one!

 

[OKTexas]

It's an IRS policy to do such for every President for every year they are in office, but it is NOT a law.... the head of IRS could tell his people NOT to follow the policy.

This is also why Chairman Neal is requesting the tax returns, if the IRS is not following their policy, then the congress may choose to codify it under a LAW instead of a policy that the president could order his IRS director, not to do....

So....it's not Trump they are after, it's the IRS?
That is going to be a tough sell when it ends up in the courts. just sayin'

the law is clear, I doubt it will make it to court, without being thrown out....

the law is the law, follow it or change it, through legislative means.... the courts are not for anything else, but determining if a law is broken, or a law or action, is unconstitutional.

I do not believe Trump's stacking of the courts, will be able to help him on this....

Why are you supporting him hiding them from Congress or anyone? What do you think he is hiding?

The court has been clear in similar cases, congress can not request things just for the sake of exposure. When congress is abusing the law, the courts are the proper venue.

.

 

[OKTexas]

#MuellerDenier!!

Greg

there is nothing to deny about the Mueller report.... we've seen absolutely ZERO of it... not even the mueller team redacted summaries that they made on each aspect of their investigations, so they could be released to the public immediately....

Barr used 2 PARTIAL sentences of Mueller's in his Barr report... he could not even put in Mueller's full sentences.... had to cut out from even those!

#MuellerDenier

Nope: you're a liar. No collusion, no obstruction. You should be ashamed of yourself for being so stupid as to still hold onto that canard. Amuses me immensely. lmao

Greg

nope, you are the fool for believing Trump....

the barr report did not say there was no collusion... Barr never used the word collusion, remember... although collusion may be something ''wrong'', collusion is not a crime....

allegedly, the Mueller report said that they could not establish, (beyond a reasonable doubt), that the Trump campaign team committed CONSPIRACY, conspiracy to defraud the United States... is the law that would be broken....

Barr's summary report did NOT SAY there was NO evidence of it, anywhere.... by using the word establish, basically tells us that there was evidence of it, but not enough to establish it beyond a reasonable doubt, which was Mueller's thresh hold, for an indictment.

As far as the obstruction charge for President Trump, one of Mueller's partial quotes used said that president Trump COULD NOT BE EXONERATED for it.... that means there is most certainly evidence collected on President Trump, for his obstruction in this official investigation....

so, basically, it really is all up in the air at this point, without having the Mueller report to read.

It's not a prosecutors job to "exonerate", it's his job to determine if there's evidence to support a prosecution. There wasn't, and by our system of justice, Trump is innocent until proven guilty is a court of law and that ain't gonna happen.

.

10 to 1, there was enough evidence to prosecute him, but since the rule for Presidents, is that they can not get indicted while in office, Mueller likely left that up to congress, to impeach or not.

Starr did not charge president clinton with obstruction or perjury either, he left it opened for Congress to decide on articles of impeachment, or not...

Jaworsky did not press charges on Richard Nixon either, they passed their information on the Congress, for them to decide on articles of impeachment, or not....

Mueller did the same....

but the Barr man came in and overstepped his bounds and cleared him.... instead of just passing it to Congress, as he was suppose to do.... as with all cases involved with a President previous to this....

the crooks are running the show in Washington DC now, don't cha know?

No the State of AR charged Clinton with perjury and obstruction, he struck a deal with them. Jaworski was operating under the independent counsel law which on longer exist, it mandated a direct report to congress. The special counsel law does not. You commies were all about privacy when it comes to abortions, not so much for your political adversaries. Barr was doing his job, even if prosecutors thought there might have been obstruction, there was not enough evidence to proceed with a prosecution. As Barr said today in congressional testimony, a prosecutors decisions are binary, charge or not. And as he said in his letter to congress, there was not sufficient probable cause to support a charge. So feel free to keep whining and being your typical hypocritical self.

.

 

[OKTexas]

So....it's not Trump they are after, it's the IRS?
That is going to be a tough sell when it ends up in the courts. just sayin'

the law is clear, I doubt it will make it to court, without being thrown out....

the law is the law, follow it or change it, through legislative means.... the courts are not for anything else, but determining if a law is broken, or a law or action, is unconstitutional.

I do not believe Trump's stacking of the courts, will be able to help him on this....

Alright, then the court could limit the tax returns to Trump time in office...

The Congress does not need anything before that.

why do you support him hiding them from us? What do you believe he is trying to hide?

You need many years of taxes, to actually understand the taxes....on someone like Trump or any billionaire, 6 years is about right....

what evidence do you have he is hiding anything?

Hiding them from us, is a good clue!

Especially when for more than 4 decades, all candidates and presidents have released them....

And? There's no constitutional requirement to do so.

.

 

[boedicca]

Congress is trying to get Trump's taxes. Every President since Nixon has released theirs and Trump "claims" he'd like to release them.

He is however fighting tooth and nail to keep them secret. His claim here is that he's under audit and for some reason that precludes him from releasing them. It doesn't.

The IRS does not lock them down for that reason, and it's CONGRESS requesting them in accordance with the law. In fact a refusal would put the the head of the IRS or Treasury Secretary in contempt of Congress.

And for what it's worth, Trump's former attorney Cohen testified under oath that Trump WASN'T under audit

What do you suppose he's hiding? Tax evasion? Money Laundering?

He's afraid of something obviously

Where can we find a downloadable version of your tax filings to review?

 

[Lovebears65]

Congress is trying to get Trump's taxes. Every President since Nixon has released theirs and Trump "claims" he'd like to release them.

He is however fighting tooth and nail to keep them secret. His claim here is that he's under audit and for some reason that precludes him from releasing them. It doesn't.

The IRS does not lock them down for that reason, and it's CONGRESS requesting them in accordance with the law. In fact a refusal would put the the head of the IRS or Treasury Secretary in contempt of Congress.

And for what it's worth, Trump's former attorney Cohen testified under oath that Trump WASN'T under audit

What do you suppose he's hiding? Tax evasion? Money Laundering?

He's afraid of something obviously

I would rather see the tax returns of congress who went in with a normal salary and are millionaires today

 

[basquebromance]

Trump is bombastic and energetic. he should be on wall street, not washington!

 

[OKTexas]

#MuellerDenier

Nope: you're a liar. No collusion, no obstruction. You should be ashamed of yourself for being so stupid as to still hold onto that canard. Amuses me immensely. lmao

Greg

nope, you are the fool for believing Trump....

the barr report did not say there was no collusion... Barr never used the word collusion, remember... although collusion may be something ''wrong'', collusion is not a crime....

allegedly, the Mueller report said that they could not establish, (beyond a reasonable doubt), that the Trump campaign team committed CONSPIRACY, conspiracy to defraud the United States... is the law that would be broken....

Barr's summary report did NOT SAY there was NO evidence of it, anywhere.... by using the word establish, basically tells us that there was evidence of it, but not enough to establish it beyond a reasonable doubt, which was Mueller's thresh hold, for an indictment.

As far as the obstruction charge for President Trump, one of Mueller's partial quotes used said that president Trump COULD NOT BE EXONERATED for it.... that means there is most certainly evidence collected on President Trump, for his obstruction in this official investigation....

so, basically, it really is all up in the air at this point, without having the Mueller report to read.

It's not a prosecutors job to "exonerate", it's his job to determine if there's evidence to support a prosecution. There wasn't, and by our system of justice, Trump is innocent until proven guilty is a court of law and that ain't gonna happen.

.

10 to 1, there was enough evidence to prosecute him, but since the rule for Presidents, is that they can not get indicted while in office, Mueller likely left that up to congress, to impeach or not.

Starr did not charge president clinton with obstruction or perjury either, he left it opened for Congress to decide on articles of impeachment, or not...

Jaworsky did not press charges on Richard Nixon either, they passed their information on the Congress, for them to decide on articles of impeachment, or not....

Mueller did the same....

but the Barr man came in and overstepped his bounds and cleared him.... instead of just passing it to Congress, as he was suppose to do.... as with all cases involved with a President previous to this....

the crooks are running the show in Washington DC now, don't cha know?

10 to 1, there was enough evidence to prosecute him, but since the rule for Presidents, is that they can not get indicted while in office,

Son, know the procedures. If there were indeed any need to indict trump, all Mueller had to do was seal an indictment. After his eight year run, then they would open that sealed indictment and proceed. you're again, in error as always. Any sealed indictment? nope!!! means mueller didn't have anything. exonerates trump on that one simple missing item. oh fking well.

Princess, the rules and process was set long ago, the special or independent counsel or any prosecutor, always passes it on to the House, to the Judiciary committee who handles impeachment inquiries.

The constitution put in place, the process to follow on Presidents.

Bullshit, the special counsel law requires a confidential report to the AG, not congress.

.

 

[Papageorgio]

Wrong again commie, that's not a legitimate legislative end. And out of curiosity what possible impeachment charge would include the need for his taxes?

.

Wrong again commie, that's not a legitimate legislative end. And out of curiosity what possible impeachment charge would include the need for his taxes?

Tax fraud and money laundering charges for starters.

How to Make Trump's Tax Returns Public | DCReport.org

"On June 14, the New York State attorney general, Barbara Underwood, filed a civil complaint against President Trump and his three oldest children, accusing them of 'persistently illegal conduct' in using the Donald J. Trump Foundation as ''ittle more than a checkbook for payments from Mr. Trump or his businesses to nonprofits, regardless of their purpose or legality.'

Ms. Underwood believes there is abundant evidence to bring criminal charges against Mr. Trump as well.

"She made that position very clear in the letters she sent to the Internal Revenue Service and the Federal Election Commission in Washington recommending 'further investigation and legal action.'"

You might as well argue Trump never lies as contend he doesn't cheat on taxes and launder money for rich Russians.

You seem to be confused, congress is NOT a law enforcement agency, they have no constitutional authority to act as one. If you think Mueller hasn't already looked at these things, you're kidding yourself.

.

You seem to be confused, congress is NOT a law enforcement agency, they have no constitutional authority to act as one. If you think Mueller hasn't already looked at these things, you're kidding yourself.

We won't know what Mueller looked at until Republican hack Bill Barr releases the report.

Congress has all the constitutional authority it needs to investigate the "Red Don's" alleged tax fraud and money laundering.

Congressional oversight - Wikipedia

"Oversight, as an outgrowth of this principle, ideally serves a number of overlapping objectives and purposes:

• improve the efficiency, economy, and effectiveness of governmental operations;
• evaluate programs and performance;
• detect and prevent poor administration, waste, abuse, arbitrary and capricious behavior, or illegal and unconstitutional conduct;
• protect civil liberties and constitutional rights;
• inform the general public and ensure that executive policies reflect the public interest;
• gather information to develop new legislative proposals or to amend existing statutes;
• ensure administrative compliance with legislative intent; and
• prevent executive encroachment on legislative authority and prerogatives.

"In sum, oversight is a way for Congress to check on, and check, the executived directors."

Alleged? Who is alleging? The only people alleging is the opposition party with no reason to allege. Just another witch hunt because the last one failed

LOL many witches caught with more to come when SDNY gets through with the criminal family Trump

You may or not be right, I have no idea what they will find or not, maybe they will find collusion between Trump and New Jersey.

 

[BS Filter]

There is collusion. Pelosi and Schumer.

 

[dannyboys]

the Congress ways and Means committee chair, is one of those ones who are authorized to get them.

How's that working out for you?

stupid little girl

we'll know something by the end of the day, today... on that.

If the IRS director follows the LAW and doesn't become another one of President Trump's lawless goons covering up for him, the ways and mean's chairman, should have them by today's end....

It appears you have gone insane.

 

[edward37]

There is collusion. Pelosi and Schumer.

Yeah BS Trump has clean hands and pigs wear tuxes and fly