The Official Trump/Harris Debate Thread....With Live Feed

[el midgetron]

Yes, he always liked them. Glad to see you recognise that.

Though his wittering about groups provided no clarity at all. We have to depend on the evidenced support he receives from Nazis for context.

You are a prime example of a Kamala voter.

 

[postman]

Nope. parts can be ruled unconstitutional.

That's not the position that Texas took with the ACA

Nonetheless, the plaintiffs in Texas, joined by the Trump administration, urge that, as amended, the ACA’s now zeroed-out individual mandate exceeds the powers of Congress because it can no longer be justified as a tax. More shockingly, they argue that the courts should invalidate the Act in its entirety; that is, that the courts should destroy, not save, the ACA, striking down every single one of its 974 pages because of one supposedly unconstitutional provision.

 

[JoeB131]

Our REVENGE on Democrats will be sweet. We want to make them suffer and cry as punishment for Dem's attacks on democracy and our great country.

Anger and bitterness is not a good counter to Joy and Hope.

We get you guys are angry. History hasn't unfolded the way you want.

 

[postman]

I'm talking about the general concept that allowing minors to be transported across state lines by someone not their parent or guardian for ANY reason is a bad fucking idea.

There goes my kids class trip to the statue of liberty.

 

[citygator]

Daaaaang.....

 

[martybegan]

That's not the position that Texas took with the ACA

Nonetheless, the plaintiffs in Texas, joined by the Trump administration, urge that, as amended, the ACA’s now zeroed-out individual mandate exceeds the powers of Congress because it can no longer be justified as a tax. More shockingly, they argue that the courts should invalidate the Act in its entirety; that is, that the courts should destroy, not save, the ACA, striking down every single one of its 974 pages because of one supposedly unconstitutional provision.

They can take any position they want, they can also change their position based on the law.

Amazing you demand perfection from your opposition while excusing hypocrisy of your own side.

 

[martybegan]

There goes my kids class trip to the statue of liberty.

Did you have to sign a permission slip for that designating the school as legal guardian for the trip?

 

[postman]

They can take any position they want, they can also change their position based on the law.

Amazing you demand perfection from your opposition while excusing hypocrisy of your own side.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

If a state argues against separability in law, then that should be the petard by which they hang.

 

[Delldude]

Or, Mike, take the firearms first and then go to court, because that’s another system.

You do know that's exactly the way the government does it, don't you?

 

[postman]

They can take any position they want, they can also change their position based on the law.

You mean "what's good for me, but not for thee".

 

[80zephyr]

What are you trying to prove with that link? I do not understand.

That Trump was right. The Dems are for allowing a baby born alive during a botched abortion to be left to die.

 

[martybegan]

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

If a state argues against separability in law, then that should be the petard by which they hang.

It depends on the law, and if the separation impacts the overall application of the law.

Removing the part on out of state prosecution does nothing to inherently impact a limit on abortion to 6 weeks in-state.

 

[Luckyone]

Here it is, what the debate was all about, in a clear way. The fact that some humor is involved, does make it highly watchable

 

[postman]

Did you have to sign a permission slip for that designating the school as legal guardian for the trip?

It only grants permission, not guardianship.

As I said, you just said the school trip was a bad idea.

 

[Luckyone]

That Trump was right. The Dems are for allowing a baby born alive during a botched abortion to be left to die.

First of all, let me prove you wrong:

Trump’s claim is false. No state has passed or is passing a law that allows the execution of a baby after it is born. Killing a person after birth is illegal in every state. “Every state explicitly criminalizes infanticide,” Mary Ziegler, a professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law, said Thursday. “There is no basis for this claim,” Kimberly Mutcherson, a professor at Rutgers Law School, said Thursday.

Having proven that, I want you to prove that any baby has ever been killed after birth because the woman did not want it (she wanted an abortion).

I will be waiting for your answer

 

[Lesh]

No. Can't find it on YouTube

Funny that. Gee, can't understand why.................

The Crowly moment we were all waiting for was then Trump brought up the Haitians eating neighboring animals that were reported by locals on the news. The moderator then stopped him and said that it was not true because a local government official said there was no evidence of that yet. Trump then tried to point to locals being interviewed stating it was happening, but he cut him off like an ass.

You do remember Crowly, right? It was the debate between Romney and Obama where the moderator stopped Romney mid-sentence as well and stated his facts were wrong. A debate then began between Romney and the moderator. LOL.

But after the debate, fact checkers found out Romney was correct and Crowly was wrong. Trouble is, the lies had their desired effect as Obama won the election.

So Haitians are actually eating our pets?

No they are not and hey… they’re not even illegals

 

[Unkotare]

...

Trump, and the people spreading this story as if it means anything beyond a “gee that’s weird as shit” story, are doing so to stoke racist sentiment.
...

"Racist"? What race?

 

[Luckyone]

Nail in Trump's coffin?

Taylor Swift, with 283 million subscribers to her Facebook page, made it known last night after the debate, that she is endorsing Harris. She also made it known that the Fake AI image of her endorsing Trump is not her. It was made by Trump or by those supporting Trump. In other words, another Trump lie.

 

[Unkotare]

First of all, let me prove you wrong:

Trump’s claim is false. No state has passed or is passing a law that allows the execution of a baby after it is born. Killing a person after birth is illegal in every state. “Every state explicitly criminalizes infanticide,” Mary Ziegler, a professor at the University of California, Davis School of Law, said Thursday. “There is no basis for this claim,” Kimberly Mutcherson, a professor at Rutgers Law School, said Thursday.

Having proven that, I want you to prove that any baby has ever been killed after birth because the woman did not want it (she wanted an abortion).

I will be waiting for your answer

Again, it does happen.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Nail in Trump's coffin?

Taylor Swift, with 283 million subscribers to her facebook page, made is known last night after the debate, that she is endorsing Harris. She also made it known that the Fake AI image of her endorsing Trump is not her. It was made by Trump or by those supporting Trump. In other words, another Trump lie.

Is she writing a song about it? Lol.