pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 71,466
- 27,654
- 2,210
sure he does. he invites them in and they bash him. every fking time. In fact, the last time Peloser stood up in a hissy fit and waved her finger and left. How immature.BTW, I agree, I don't like EOs at all. but, and I use this gracefully, when the congress refuses to work with a president, the president has no other options to act for the majority of citizens. Get the swamp cleaned out and eliminate the EOs. it's really that simple. get the legislators to do their jobs. impeach, impeach. The same was true for obammy. i didn't like that either.then why can't trump stop the DACA EO?Laws can't be simply ignored. The next president can simply ignore an EO. It's not law, it's tied up in the courts. It shouldn't be.
The courts have wrong stepped in. In this case it wouldn't have really mattered as Trump wouldn't have actually done anything. But in the end, it's still in the courts which is kinda my point. Even if Trump tried to enforce this it will be tied up in the courts until after he is gone.
EO's are not about doing the right thing. EO's are about dividing.
Trump NEVER tries. He never goes before Congress to push for something. He never goes before the country to argue why he needs something passed. He tweets and signs EO's. I am not singling Trump out here either......EO's are the realm of the lazy.
I think Bush is a piece of crap but I wouldn't put him in the same lazy category as Obama and Trump.
Inviting Pelosi anywhere is a waste of time. Take your argument to Congress and the people. That is what Reagan did. That is what Bush did. Bush gets condemned not for doing that but by lying to the Congress and the people to get what he wanted.