the article is a propaganda rag. The writers have lifted techniques which are prevalent in publications
found in STORMFRONT
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
- Thread starter Billy_Kinetta
- Start date
the article is a propaganda rag. The writers have lifted techniques which are prevalent in publications
found in STORMFRONT
How about giving us some proof of what you're claiming, since Bolton (no fan of Trump) has even publically stated that it's a lie????How about acting as if you are not a blind follower of a deeply flawed leader? The reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known. When Trump is finally out of office and the price of telling the truth is no longer so high all these people will come forward, will you still think it's a lie?How about giving us a verifiable witness????You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.If you have one, post it....If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Not to the journalists.
Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....
If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....
Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...
We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....
You don't have one, do you????
occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,198
- 1,590
Your wish for absolute verification is a lie since you probably totally accept all the totally unverified Qanon crap.How about giving us some proof of what you're claiming, since Bolton (no fan of Trump) has even publically stated that it's a lie????How about acting as if you are not a blind follower of a deeply flawed leader? The reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known. When Trump is finally out of office and the price of telling the truth is no longer so high all these people will come forward, will you still think it's a lie?How about giving us a verifiable witness????You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.If you have one, post it....If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Not to the journalists.
Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....
If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....
Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...
We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....
You don't have one, do you????
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 67,026
- 48,702
- 3,565
Liberal trump haters believe what they want to believeThe reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known.
CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 146,806
- 69,955
- 2,330
Lol..That proposal was nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Never happened
“Journalists?”Not to the journalists.
no one cares what the lib reporters think
[/QUOTE
so true----over the years I have come to understand that "Journalists" write for money. Their observations, recordings and expressed opinions are based on THE BOTTOM LINE (in most, but not ALL cases......just most)
Well, asking you to give us some reason to believe you, like actual statements from witnesses (where we don't assume that you're just trying to feed us some fabricated bullshit) isn't unreasonable....Your wish for absolute verification is a lie since you probably totally accept all the totally unverified Qanon crap.How about giving us some proof of what you're claiming, since Bolton (no fan of Trump) has even publically stated that it's a lie????How about acting as if you are not a blind follower of a deeply flawed leader? The reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known. When Trump is finally out of office and the price of telling the truth is no longer so high all these people will come forward, will you still think it's a lie?How about giving us a verifiable witness????You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.If you have one, post it....If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Not to the journalists.
Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....
If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....
Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...
We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....
You don't have one, do you????
occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,198
- 1,590
In the end you are going to believe whatever you want. The real tragedy is that when Trump is out of office for a few years you will not admit having ever supported him.Well, asking you to give us some reason to believe you, like actual statements from witnesses (where we don't assume that you're just trying to feed us some fabricated bullshit) isn't unreasonable....Your wish for absolute verification is a lie since you probably totally accept all the totally unverified Qanon crap.How about giving us some proof of what you're claiming, since Bolton (no fan of Trump) has even publically stated that it's a lie????How about acting as if you are not a blind follower of a deeply flawed leader? The reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known. When Trump is finally out of office and the price of telling the truth is no longer so high all these people will come forward, will you still think it's a lie?How about giving us a verifiable witness????You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.If you have one, post it....If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Not to the journalists.
Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....
If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....
Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...
We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....
You don't have one, do you????
Translation: You've got nothing.....In the end you are going to believe whatever you want. The real tragedy is that when Trump is out of office for a few years you will not admit having ever supported him.Well, asking you to give us some reason to believe you, like actual statements from witnesses (where we don't assume that you're just trying to feed us some fabricated bullshit) isn't unreasonable....Your wish for absolute verification is a lie since you probably totally accept all the totally unverified Qanon crap.How about giving us some proof of what you're claiming, since Bolton (no fan of Trump) has even publically stated that it's a lie????How about acting as if you are not a blind follower of a deeply flawed leader? The reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known. When Trump is finally out of office and the price of telling the truth is no longer so high all these people will come forward, will you still think it's a lie?How about giving us a verifiable witness????You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.If you have one, post it....If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Not to the journalists.
Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....
If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....
Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...
We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....
You don't have one, do you????
Just as I thought....
Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,205
- 2,320
- Thread starter
- #30
If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Not to the journalists.
Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....
If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....
You don't, so your statement is asinine.
Billy_Kinetta
Paladin of the Lost Hour
- Mar 4, 2013
- 52,766
- 22,205
- 2,320
- Thread starter
- #31
Proof right wingers don't care about misuse of power.Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Please explain the "misuse of power" you describe in legal terms.
occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,198
- 1,590
I've already stated that there is nothing that could sway your blind support for your dear leader. You are probably proud of that fact.Translation: You've got nothing.....In the end you are going to believe whatever you want. The real tragedy is that when Trump is out of office for a few years you will not admit having ever supported him.Well, asking you to give us some reason to believe you, like actual statements from witnesses (where we don't assume that you're just trying to feed us some fabricated bullshit) isn't unreasonable....Your wish for absolute verification is a lie since you probably totally accept all the totally unverified Qanon crap.How about giving us some proof of what you're claiming, since Bolton (no fan of Trump) has even publically stated that it's a lie????How about acting as if you are not a blind follower of a deeply flawed leader? The reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known. When Trump is finally out of office and the price of telling the truth is no longer so high all these people will come forward, will you still think it's a lie?How about giving us a verifiable witness????You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.If you have one, post it....If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Not to the journalists.
Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....
If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....
Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...
We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....
You don't have one, do you????
Just as I thought....
In the end you are going to believe whatever you want. The real tragedy is that when Trump is out of office for a few years you will not admit having ever supported him.Well, asking you to give us some reason to believe you, like actual statements from witnesses (where we don't assume that you're just trying to feed us some fabricated bullshit) isn't unreasonable....Your wish for absolute verification is a lie since you probably totally accept all the totally unverified Qanon crap.How about giving us some proof of what you're claiming, since Bolton (no fan of Trump) has even publically stated that it's a lie????How about acting as if you are not a blind follower of a deeply flawed leader? The reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known. When Trump is finally out of office and the price of telling the truth is no longer so high all these people will come forward, will you still think it's a lie?How about giving us a verifiable witness????You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.If you have one, post it....If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Not to the journalists.
Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....
If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....
Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...
We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....
You don't have one, do you????
I support Trump----SEE? now you have PROOF
Well, some evidence that you're not lying out your ass would help....I've already stated that there is nothing that could sway your blind support for your dear leader. You are probably proud of that fact.Translation: You've got nothing.....In the end you are going to believe whatever you want. The real tragedy is that when Trump is out of office for a few years you will not admit having ever supported him.Well, asking you to give us some reason to believe you, like actual statements from witnesses (where we don't assume that you're just trying to feed us some fabricated bullshit) isn't unreasonable....Your wish for absolute verification is a lie since you probably totally accept all the totally unverified Qanon crap.How about giving us some proof of what you're claiming, since Bolton (no fan of Trump) has even publically stated that it's a lie????How about acting as if you are not a blind follower of a deeply flawed leader? The reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known. When Trump is finally out of office and the price of telling the truth is no longer so high all these people will come forward, will you still think it's a lie?How about giving us a verifiable witness????You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.If you have one, post it....If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Not to the journalists.
Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....
If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....
Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...
We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....
You don't have one, do you????
Just as I thought....
But you don't have any....
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #35
Unlike the fantastical right wing?Liberal trump haters believe what they want to believeThe reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known.
danielpalos
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #36
It is not the job of the President to deny or disparage educational curriculum. We have a Department of Education to look into those matters and then provide guidance.Proof right wingers don't care about misuse of power.Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Please explain the "misuse of power" you describe in legal terms.
It is not the job of the President to deny or disparage educational curriculum. We have a Department of Education to look into those matters and then provide guidance.Proof right wingers don't care about misuse of power.Good, but not enough. The public school system needs to be purged of all revisionist nonsense.
Trump warns schools teaching 1619 Project 'will not be funded'
Please explain the "misuse of power" you describe in legal terms.
the whole USA is the president's job The idiotic
1619 program is DANGEROUS RADICAL ETHNOCENTRISM (the stuff of which fascism is made)
Mac-7
Diamond Member
- Oct 9, 2019
- 67,026
- 48,702
- 3,565
We dont fall for unsourced lies from the liberal news mediaUnlike the fantastical right wing?
occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,198
- 1,590
What do you have to prove that the biggest narcissist we have ever seen did not say those things? Your flat refusal to accept these entirely plausible allegations says a lot about you. I am not trying to change your mind. Only you can do that. If anything I am ridiculing the attitude of the Trump true believers who will follow him no matter what he defiles.Well, some evidence that you're not lying out your ass would help....I've already stated that there is nothing that could sway your blind support for your dear leader. You are probably proud of that fact.Translation: You've got nothing.....In the end you are going to believe whatever you want. The real tragedy is that when Trump is out of office for a few years you will not admit having ever supported him.Well, asking you to give us some reason to believe you, like actual statements from witnesses (where we don't assume that you're just trying to feed us some fabricated bullshit) isn't unreasonable....Your wish for absolute verification is a lie since you probably totally accept all the totally unverified Qanon crap.How about giving us some proof of what you're claiming, since Bolton (no fan of Trump) has even publically stated that it's a lie????How about acting as if you are not a blind follower of a deeply flawed leader? The reason the Atlantic article has gained so much traction is that it rings true with what is already known. When Trump is finally out of office and the price of telling the truth is no longer so high all these people will come forward, will you still think it's a lie?How about giving us a verifiable witness????You are still defending Trump after everything he has done and said right out in the open. Doubtful there is any piece of verified information that you would accept or any action by him that would move you to withdraw your support.If you have one, post it....If we had tape of these statements coming out of his mouth you would still defend him.So you think they should hide their "witnesses", where no one can tell if they even exist????Admit it. Even if everyone came forward and publicly stated what they heard the president say about our troops you would call them liars and then work to destroy them. In the end Trumpbots would forgive dear leader for pissing on anything they supposedly treasure.If they have "proof", they need to have the "witnesses" come forward....Which there is no proof of, other than an article in the Atlantic (which refused to name their "sources"), and that FOX News called a total fabrication....Lol..This was proposal nothing more than a deflection from Trump calling our fallen soldiers losers.
Not to the journalists.
Otherwise, there is no evidence that they were anywhere near what Trump is being accused of (or any proof that they even exist).....
If you can't produce a witness to something, we have to assume that you don't have one....
Otherwise, you just have an allegation with no identifiable "witnesses"...
We don't know if they even exist, or if one of the drug-addled reporters at the Atlantic just made it up....
You don't have one, do you????
Just as I thought....
But you don't have any....
occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,198
- 1,590
You damned sure swallow unsourced allegations if they come from some conservative blog no one ever heard of.We dont fall for unsourced lies from the liberal news mediaUnlike the fantastical right wing?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 290
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 589
- Views
- 8K
- Replies
- 72
- Views
- 552
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 255
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 959
- Views
- 6K
- Poll
- Replies
- 27
- Views
- 187
- Replies
- 110
- Views
- 484
- Replies
- 100
- Views
- 554
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8537
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 485
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-