Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Don't even try Nitwit, you never finished 3rd grade. OtherwiseYou are so full of shit. Massive tax cuts, greater spending, higher tax revenue. Liberal tax increases, less spending, higher taxes again, less spending, major deficit follows like 10 fucking trillion(unpatriotically of course). Dumbass , wake the fuck up.
I'll need a Moron-to-English dictionary to decipher what this idiot wrote above.
When we started losing an average of 700,000 jobs per month it wasn't GWB who caused it. Still trying to change history? Not on my watch, you nitwit. When liberals break things, they have to blame the Republicans for what they did. And what is worse, is the liberal voters actually believe them. Stupid people vote dumbocrat. Until 2016, then many woke the fuck up. bwaaaahhaaaahhhhaaaaa........
- Obama doubled the national debt
- TARP was an Obama plan
- All disbursements of cash under the "private profits, public liability" plan for GM were made by Obama
- Bailouts of GM and Chrysler under TARP added up to $80 billion, a tiny drop in the $10 TRILLION of new debt added by Obama
Here ARE some facts that contributed and STILL are contributing to our debt......
Did GWB offer massive tax cuts while involving us in TWO costly wars?
Yes or No?
Did GWB initiate Medicare Advantage without a clue of how and who was going to pay for it?
Yes or No?
While the tax cuts were implemented, did we lose at an average of 700,000 jobs per month under GWB?
Yes or No?
[
I don't hate Republicans. I am one. I hate pseudocons like you who have infected my party.
You are a complete waste of time. The tard is just too deep and too embedded in you.
Don't even try Nitwit, you never finished 3rd grade. OtherwiseYou are so full of shit. Massive tax cuts, greater spending, higher tax revenue. Liberal tax increases, less spending, higher taxes again, less spending, major deficit follows like 10 fucking trillion(unpatriotically of course). Dumbass , wake the fuck up.
I'll need a Moron-to-English dictionary to decipher what this idiot wrote above.
When we started losing an average of 700,000 jobs per month it wasn't GWB who caused it. Still trying to change history? Not on my watch, you nitwit. When liberals break things, they have to blame the Republicans for what they did. And what is worse, is the liberal voters actually believe them. Stupid people vote dumbocrat. Until 2016, then many woke the fuck up. bwaaaahhaaaahhhhaaaaa........
- Obama doubled the national debt
- TARP was an Obama plan
- All disbursements of cash under the "private profits, public liability" plan for GM were made by Obama
- Bailouts of GM and Chrysler under TARP added up to $80 billion, a tiny drop in the $10 TRILLION of new debt added by Obama
Here ARE some facts that contributed and STILL are contributing to our debt......
Did GWB offer massive tax cuts while involving us in TWO costly wars?
Yes or No?
Did GWB initiate Medicare Advantage without a clue of how and who was going to pay for it?
Yes or No?
While the tax cuts were implemented, did we lose at an average of 700,000 jobs per month under GWB?
Yes or No?
I love these reports, have any of these "experts" been right about anything?
WTF are you smoking?
You know we actually did this tax cutting thing before and have since collected record low revenues, which account for significant portion of our accumulated debt.
I love these reports, have any of these "experts" been right about anything?
WTF are you smoking?
You know we actually did this tax cutting thing before and have since collected record low revenues, which account for significant portion of our accumulated debt.
Show me the chart of fed govt revenue
Don't even try Nitwit, you never finished 3rd grade. OtherwiseYou are so full of shit. Massive tax cuts, greater spending, higher tax revenue. Liberal tax increases, less spending, higher taxes again, less spending, major deficit follows like 10 fucking trillion(unpatriotically of course). Dumbass , wake the fuck up.
I'll need a Moron-to-English dictionary to decipher what this idiot wrote above.
When we started losing an average of 700,000 jobs per month it wasn't GWB who caused it. Still trying to change history? Not on my watch, you nitwit. When liberals break things, they have to blame the Republicans for what they did. And what is worse, is the liberal voters actually believe them. Stupid people vote dumbocrat. Until 2016, then many woke the fuck up. bwaaaahhaaaahhhhaaaaa........
- Obama doubled the national debt
- TARP was an Obama plan
- All disbursements of cash under the "private profits, public liability" plan for GM were made by Obama
- Bailouts of GM and Chrysler under TARP added up to $80 billion, a tiny drop in the $10 TRILLION of new debt added by Obama
Here ARE some facts that contributed and STILL are contributing to our debt......
Did GWB offer massive tax cuts while involving us in TWO costly wars?
Yes or No?
Did GWB initiate Medicare Advantage without a clue of how and who was going to pay for it?
Yes or No?
While the tax cuts were implemented, did we lose at an average of 700,000 jobs per month under GWB?
Yes or No?
Bush vs. Obama: Private Sector Job Creation
That calculation doesn't count the economic expansion the tax cuts would create. Historically tax cuts do increase deficits in the short term (2-3 years), but then grow revenue from there on due to economic expansion
Dynamic effects are a small fraction (~20%) of first order revenue reduction. So instead of $10 Trillion you can argue it will be more like 8T and I'll let you do it too....as soon as you conservatives also start arguing that spending this deficit will suppress should be adjusted for dynamic effects too....which you will not, so I will not agree to such standard of accounting on revenues side.
I love these reports, have any of these "experts" been right about anything?
WTF are you smoking?
You know we actually did this tax cutting thing before and have since collected record low revenues, which account for significant portion of our accumulated debt.
Show me the chart of fed govt revenue
I did, but you of course don't like the size of economy adjusted version that is the standard for serious comparison, It just doesn't fit your ridiculous free lunch myths that I paid less taxes while government collected more revenues.
Don't even try Nitwit, you never finished 3rd grade. OtherwiseYou are so full of shit. Massive tax cuts, greater spending, higher tax revenue. Liberal tax increases, less spending, higher taxes again, less spending, major deficit follows like 10 fucking trillion(unpatriotically of course). Dumbass , wake the fuck up.
I'll need a Moron-to-English dictionary to decipher what this idiot wrote above.
When we started losing an average of 700,000 jobs per month it wasn't GWB who caused it. Still trying to change history? Not on my watch, you nitwit. When liberals break things, they have to blame the Republicans for what they did. And what is worse, is the liberal voters actually believe them. Stupid people vote dumbocrat. Until 2016, then many woke the fuck up. bwaaaahhaaaahhhhaaaaa........
- Obama doubled the national debt
- TARP was an Obama plan
- All disbursements of cash under the "private profits, public liability" plan for GM were made by Obama
- Bailouts of GM and Chrysler under TARP added up to $80 billion, a tiny drop in the $10 TRILLION of new debt added by Obama
Here ARE some facts that contributed and STILL are contributing to our debt......
Did GWB offer massive tax cuts while involving us in TWO costly wars?
Yes or No?
Did GWB initiate Medicare Advantage without a clue of how and who was going to pay for it?
Yes or No?
While the tax cuts were implemented, did we lose at an average of 700,000 jobs per month under GWB?
Yes or No?
Bush vs. Obama: Private Sector Job Creation
You are so unfair! Republicans only had 6 years of majorities in all branches of government to fix Clinton's roaring-90s economy and surplus as far as the eye can see!
That calculation doesn't count the economic expansion the tax cuts would create. Historically tax cuts do increase deficits in the short term (2-3 years), but then grow revenue from there on due to economic expansion
Dynamic effects are a small fraction (~20%) of first order revenue reduction. So instead of $10 Trillion you can argue it will be more like 8T and I'll let you do it too....as soon as you conservatives also start arguing that spending this deficit will suppress should be adjusted for dynamic effects too....which you will not, so I will not agree to such standard of accounting on revenues side.
Yes, I am a fiscal conservative. Once again you show liberals are all about money. It's the only measuring stick for you. Am I going to help you get other people's money or try to help keep you away. You're consumed with greed, and you constantly demonstrate that
I love these reports, have any of these "experts" been right about anything?
WTF are you smoking?
You know we actually did this tax cutting thing before and have since collected record low revenues, which account for significant portion of our accumulated debt.
Show me the chart of fed govt revenue
I did, but you of course don't like the size of economy adjusted version that is the standard for serious comparison, It just doesn't fit your ridiculous free lunch myths that I paid less taxes while government collected more revenues.
You pointed that out to liberals while W was President, right?
I crack myself up ...
That calculation doesn't count the economic expansion the tax cuts would create. Historically tax cuts do increase deficits in the short term (2-3 years), but then grow revenue from there on due to economic expansion
Dynamic effects are a small fraction (~20%) of first order revenue reduction. So instead of $10 Trillion you can argue it will be more like 8T and I'll let you do it too....as soon as you conservatives also start arguing that spending this deficit will suppress should be adjusted for dynamic effects too....which you will not, so I will not agree to such standard of accounting on revenues side.
Yes, I am a fiscal conservative. Once again you show liberals are all about money. It's the only measuring stick for you. Am I going to help you get other people's money or try to help keep you away. You're consumed with greed, and you constantly demonstrate that
My only thought about your comment is - WTF???
I love these reports, have any of these "experts" been right about anything?
WTF are you smoking?
You know we actually did this tax cutting thing before and have since collected record low revenues, which account for significant portion of our accumulated debt.
Show me the chart of fed govt revenue
I did, but you of course don't like the size of economy adjusted version that is the standard for serious comparison, It just doesn't fit your ridiculous free lunch myths that I paid less taxes while government collected more revenues.
You pointed that out to liberals while W was President, right?
I crack myself up ...
Yes, it seems that you do crack...by yourself. Maybe you shouldn't?
That calculation doesn't count the economic expansion the tax cuts would create. Historically tax cuts do increase deficits in the short term (2-3 years), but then grow revenue from there on due to economic expansion
Dynamic effects are a small fraction (~20%) of first order revenue reduction. So instead of $10 Trillion you can argue it will be more like 8T and I'll let you do it too....as soon as you conservatives also start arguing that spending this deficit will suppress should be adjusted for dynamic effects too....which you will not, so I will not agree to such standard of accounting on revenues side.
Yes, I am a fiscal conservative. Once again you show liberals are all about money. It's the only measuring stick for you. Am I going to help you get other people's money or try to help keep you away. You're consumed with greed, and you constantly demonstrate that
My only thought about your comment is - WTF???
I'll try to dumb it down for you, though I may not be able to dumb it down all the way to you.
I'm socially more liberal than you are, I'm more small military than you are.
Yet you think I'm a "conservative." The only thing I'm more conservative than you is money. Yet that's the only thing you hear, your obsession with money driven by your greed. Getting your hands on other people's money is the only thing you measure me by because money is the only thing you really care about. The rest is just noise to you
Don't even try Nitwit, you never finished 3rd grade. OtherwiseYou are so full of shit. Massive tax cuts, greater spending, higher tax revenue. Liberal tax increases, less spending, higher taxes again, less spending, major deficit follows like 10 fucking trillion(unpatriotically of course). Dumbass , wake the fuck up.
I'll need a Moron-to-English dictionary to decipher what this idiot wrote above.
When we started losing an average of 700,000 jobs per month it wasn't GWB who caused it. Still trying to change history? Not on my watch, you nitwit. When liberals break things, they have to blame the Republicans for what they did. And what is worse, is the liberal voters actually believe them. Stupid people vote dumbocrat. Until 2016, then many woke the fuck up. bwaaaahhaaaahhhhaaaaa........
- Obama doubled the national debt
- TARP was an Obama plan
- All disbursements of cash under the "private profits, public liability" plan for GM were made by Obama
- Bailouts of GM and Chrysler under TARP added up to $80 billion, a tiny drop in the $10 TRILLION of new debt added by Obama
Here ARE some facts that contributed and STILL are contributing to our debt......
Did GWB offer massive tax cuts while involving us in TWO costly wars?
Yes or No?
Did GWB initiate Medicare Advantage without a clue of how and who was going to pay for it?
Yes or No?
While the tax cuts were implemented, did we lose at an average of 700,000 jobs per month under GWB?
Yes or No?
Bush vs. Obama: Private Sector Job Creation
You are so unfair! Republicans only had 6 years of majorities in all branches of government to fix Clinton's roaring-90s economy and surplus as far as the eye can see!
what's new? As per Romney, 47% of Americans do not pay Federal income tax NOW....Trump Tax Plan Gives 47% Of Cuts To Richest 1%, New Analysis Finds
According to the nonpartisan Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center, Trump’s latest proposals would cut taxes by $6.2 trillion over the next decade, with 47% of all cuts in 2017 going to the top 1%.
The tax cuts that Trump is now proposing are smaller than the $9.5 trillion in cuts he floated last year, but are also more tilted in favor of the wealthy.
Under Trump’s new plan, every income group would still get tax cuts, but upper income households would receive the most relief, not only in dollars, but as a percentage of income.
Trump Tax Plan Gives 47% Of Cuts To Richest 1%, New Analysis Finds
He said those making >$25 Thousand indie or >$50 jointly would pay $0. Seems like the tax cuts are supposed to go to the poorest of the poor. Unless there is a new plan.
Lets see if those who are poor are still filling out 1040’s in 2018….if so; you’ll know you were sold a bill of goods.
Don't even try Nitwit, you never finished 3rd grade. OtherwiseYou are so full of shit. Massive tax cuts, greater spending, higher tax revenue. Liberal tax increases, less spending, higher taxes again, less spending, major deficit follows like 10 fucking trillion(unpatriotically of course). Dumbass , wake the fuck up.
I'll need a Moron-to-English dictionary to decipher what this idiot wrote above.
When we started losing an average of 700,000 jobs per month it wasn't GWB who caused it. Still trying to change history? Not on my watch, you nitwit. When liberals break things, they have to blame the Republicans for what they did. And what is worse, is the liberal voters actually believe them. Stupid people vote dumbocrat. Until 2016, then many woke the fuck up. bwaaaahhaaaahhhhaaaaa........
- Obama doubled the national debt
- TARP was an Obama plan
- All disbursements of cash under the "private profits, public liability" plan for GM were made by Obama
- Bailouts of GM and Chrysler under TARP added up to $80 billion, a tiny drop in the $10 TRILLION of new debt added by Obama
Here ARE some facts that contributed and STILL are contributing to our debt......
Did GWB offer massive tax cuts while involving us in TWO costly wars?
Yes or No?
Did GWB initiate Medicare Advantage without a clue of how and who was going to pay for it?
Yes or No?
While the tax cuts were implemented, did we lose at an average of 700,000 jobs per month under GWB?
Yes or No?
Bush vs. Obama: Private Sector Job Creation
You are so unfair! Republicans only had 6 years of majorities in all branches of government to fix Clinton's roaring-90s economy and surplus as far as the eye can see!
lets see, at the end of Clintons admin, MCI/WorldCom, Enron and the Dot com bubble burst leaving GW a recession, that you liberals don't ever talk about. GW didn't bitch and moan how he had to inherit that recession but went to work to revitalize the economy/ Then in 2001 9/11 happened removing trillions of dollars from the economy so GW lowered taxes put more money into WORKING peoples hands which were spent and tax revenues rose, because the economy started moving forward. Also, the contract with America had 2 years limited welfare(Clinton signed that) so people couldn't sit in their parents basement getting FREE stuff, for after 2 years the welfare went away. But in comes Obama, puts 99 weeks of unemployment, overrides Bill's welfare bill so those on welfare could be welfare queens forever. You just cant get more dishonest and stupid as a liberal.
That calculation doesn't count the economic expansion the tax cuts would create. Historically tax cuts do increase deficits in the short term (2-3 years), but then grow revenue from there on due to economic expansion
Dynamic effects are a small fraction (~20%) of first order revenue reduction. So instead of $10 Trillion you can argue it will be more like 8T and I'll let you do it too....as soon as you conservatives also start arguing that spending this deficit will suppress should be adjusted for dynamic effects too....which you will not, so I will not agree to such standard of accounting on revenues side.
Yes, I am a fiscal conservative. Once again you show liberals are all about money. It's the only measuring stick for you. Am I going to help you get other people's money or try to help keep you away. You're consumed with greed, and you constantly demonstrate that
My only thought about your comment is - WTF???
I'll try to dumb it down for you, though I may not be able to dumb it down all the way to you.
I'm socially more liberal than you are, I'm more small military than you are.
Yet you think I'm a "conservative." The only thing I'm more conservative than you is money. Yet that's the only thing you hear, your obsession with money driven by your greed. Getting your hands on other people's money is the only thing you measure me by because money is the only thing you really care about. The rest is just noise to you
Our exchange so far:
Kaz: Tax cuts have some dynamic feedback.
Anton: But they make for a small fraction of their static reduction to revenues.
Kaz: You are so fucking greedy!
WHAT. THE. FUCK is wrong with you Kaz?
Bullshit!Historically tax cuts spur economic growth.
