Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
how about body paint that insulates like clothes?Better products at lower cost, always increase market share. That is a management responsibility.You mean the same party that fired air traffic controllers and decimated unions in general.Except when they need their votes:The right wing, prefers to blame the poor.
Race, class and the election of Trump - World Socialist Web Site
"The interpretation of the 2016 election through the prism of race and, to a lesser extent, gender, stands in glaring contradiction to the facts. The electorate that defeated Clinton—the multimillionaire personification of the political status quo—had voted twice to put Barack Obama in the White House.
"Trump owes his victory largely to a surge in voting by non-college-educated whites aged 45-64, particularly men. This demographic voted by a lopsided margin for the Republican billionaire.
"These people, born between 1952 and 1971, entered the work force between 1970 and 1989. They therefore experienced mass layoffs, declining wages and worsening working conditions throughout their working lives."
That would be your party buying cheap crap from chins
.
Better products at cheaper cost my ass..
Levi's made in America used to last a 100 years with men like me wearing them.
Hell they were such bad asses people sell them for 1000s of dollars now a days
Now little girls can tear apart Levi's made in China in less then a week
The only thing that compelled FDR to make any of his decisions was his fascist ideology.But we don't see any Democrats proposing the solutions FDR was compelled to make at the outset of the Great Depression. Obama promised Hope and Change and eight years later millions of blue collar voters who had supported him twice turned to Trump. Any possibility of a Green New Deal that would supply millions of living wage jobs does not seem to be a solution either major party will seriously consider, possibly because of the tax burden it would place on their major funders.Seems like the democrats are willing to try to come up with some solutions, instead of having nothing but repeal.Since the mid-1970s the Democrats recognized the impending demise of organized labor's political influence and navigated into the same fund raising waters as Republicans. Imho, today both major parties serve the interests of the US investor class (about 5% of all voters) at the expense of the overwhelming majority of citizens with the lion's share of the gains going to those at the very top of the economy.You mean the same party that fired air traffic controllers and decimated unions in general.Except when they need their votes:
Race, class and the election of Trump - World Socialist Web Site
"The interpretation of the 2016 election through the prism of race and, to a lesser extent, gender, stands in glaring contradiction to the facts. The electorate that defeated Clinton—the multimillionaire personification of the political status quo—had voted twice to put Barack Obama in the White House.
"Trump owes his victory largely to a surge in voting by non-college-educated whites aged 45-64, particularly men. This demographic voted by a lopsided margin for the Republican billionaire.
"These people, born between 1952 and 1971, entered the work force between 1970 and 1989. They therefore experienced mass layoffs, declining wages and worsening working conditions throughout their working lives."
bailing out the rich had priority over equal protection of the law for the poor.But we don't see any Democrats proposing the solutions FDR was compelled to make at the outset of the Great Depression. Obama promised Hope and Change and eight years later millions of blue collar voters who had supported him twice turned to Trump. Any possibility of a Green New Deal that would supply millions of living wage jobs does not seem to be a solution either major party will seriously consider, possibly because of the tax burden it would place on their major funders.Seems like the democrats are willing to try to come up with some solutions, instead of having nothing but repeal.Since the mid-1970s the Democrats recognized the impending demise of organized labor's political influence and navigated into the same fund raising waters as Republicans. Imho, today both major parties serve the interests of the US investor class (about 5% of all voters) at the expense of the overwhelming majority of citizens with the lion's share of the gains going to those at the very top of the economy.You mean the same party that fired air traffic controllers and decimated unions in general.Except when they need their votes:
Race, class and the election of Trump - World Socialist Web Site
"The interpretation of the 2016 election through the prism of race and, to a lesser extent, gender, stands in glaring contradiction to the facts. The electorate that defeated Clinton—the multimillionaire personification of the political status quo—had voted twice to put Barack Obama in the White House.
"Trump owes his victory largely to a surge in voting by non-college-educated whites aged 45-64, particularly men. This demographic voted by a lopsided margin for the Republican billionaire.
"These people, born between 1952 and 1971, entered the work force between 1970 and 1989. They therefore experienced mass layoffs, declining wages and worsening working conditions throughout their working lives."
I have never been a proponent of the wall (I've always felt that the money would be better spent on technology and people as a means of securing our borders). But after seeing this, it's hard to argue with the results...
I have never been a proponent of the wall (I've always felt that the money would be better spent on technology and people as a means of securing our borders). But after seeing this, it's hard to argue with the results...
I have never been a proponent of the wall (I've always felt that the money would be better spent on technology and people as a means of securing our borders). But after seeing this, it's hard to argue with the results...
Yes, it is our extra-Constitutional, alleged War on Drugs, that helps create the conditions described in the video. It is what happens when we get a War on Drugs, instead of a Mission to Mars.
I have never been a proponent of the wall (I've always felt that the money would be better spent on technology and people as a means of securing our borders). But after seeing this, it's hard to argue with the results...
I hate to say it, but what do you think I've been telling you?
Damn ... there you go confusing the left with facts again!!
Don't you know the left can't count past 20? Well, the men can count to 21, (probably closer to 20 1/2) .... ??
Damn ... there you go confusing the left with facts again!!
Don't you know the left can't count past 20? Well, the men can count to 21, (probably closer to 20 1/2) .... ??
The Comrade's wall is not going to get built.. Congress has already said NO--they're not going to fund it, and for good reason--they don't work. A great video on this--at the end of this video it will tell you how much we already wasted on walls and fences. Then it will move into another video regarding the terrain issues, and the problems with structural security.
Watch the above video through it's entirety.
They have found 240 of these in the San Diego region alone.
The ins and outs of U.S.-Mexico border tunnels
The only way to secure the border is with high tech motion detectors and more border patrol stations. Anything they can see--can and will always be compromised.
Damn ... there you go confusing the left with facts again!!
Don't you know the left can't count past 20? Well, the men can count to 21, (probably closer to 20 1/2) .... ??
The Comrade's wall is not going to get built.. Congress has already said NO--they're not going to fund it, and for good reason--they don't work. A great video on this--at the end of this video it will tell you how much we already wasted on walls and fences. Then it will move into another video regarding the terrain issues, and the problems with structural security.
I have never been a proponent of the wall (I've always felt that the money would be better spent on technology and people as a means of securing our borders). But after seeing this, it's hard to argue with the results...
Yes, it is our extra-Constitutional, alleged War on Drugs, that helps create the conditions described in the video. It is what happens when we get a War on Drugs, instead of a Mission to Mars.
Figured the dopers would oppose the wall.
Damn ... there you go confusing the left with facts again!!
Don't you know the left can't count past 20? Well, the men can count to 21, (probably closer to 20 1/2) .... ??
The Comrade's wall is not going to get built.. Congress has already said NO--they're not going to fund it, and for good reason--they don't work. A great video on this--at the end of this video it will tell you how much we already wasted on walls and fences. Then it will move into another video regarding the terrain issues, and the problems with structural security.
Watch the above video through it's entirety.
They have found 240 of these in the San Diego region alone.
The ins and outs of U.S.-Mexico border tunnels
The only way to secure the border is with high tech motion detectors and more border patrol stations. Anything they can see--can and will always be compromised.
Damn ... there you go confusing the left with facts again!!
Don't you know the left can't count past 20? Well, the men can count to 21, (probably closer to 20 1/2) .... ??
The Comrade's wall is not going to get built.. Congress has already said NO--they're not going to fund it, and for good reason--they don't work. A great video on this--at the end of this video it will tell you how much we already wasted on walls and fences. Then it will move into another video regarding the terrain issues, and the problems with structural security.
Watch the above video through it's entirety.
They have found 240 of these in the San Diego region alone.
The ins and outs of U.S.-Mexico border tunnels
The only way to secure the border is with high tech motion detectors and more border patrol stations. Anything they can see--can and will always be compromised.
So you showed, what, a dozen people getting through it? How many got through before they built those walls, 600,000/year? All your stupid transparent claims about the wall not working depend on it not being watched. The effectiveness of anyone guarding the boarder without a wall will be magnified 1000 times by the wall.
Build the fucking wall, moron.
the right wing prefers to, "ditch capitalism" for their "national socialism" at every opportunity.Damn ... there you go confusing the left with facts again!!
Don't you know the left can't count past 20? Well, the men can count to 21, (probably closer to 20 1/2) .... ??
The Comrade's wall is not going to get built.. Congress has already said NO--they're not going to fund it, and for good reason--they don't work. A great video on this--at the end of this video it will tell you how much we already wasted on walls and fences. Then it will move into another video regarding the terrain issues, and the problems with structural security.
The average idiot - and you're certainly not average, are you - knows that the wall is but a single tool in a large toolbox of techniques, resources, and disciplines that can be used to manage the border.
To attempt to ignore those tools in order to try to prove your position is, at the least, intellectually dishonest, demonstrates your lack of engineering knowledge, and - at the most - is just plain dumb.
“Walls work — just ask Israel.” - President Trump
That's left-wing ideology, snowflake. Right-wing ideology "ditches" fascism for liberty.the right wing prefers to, "ditch capitalism" for their "national socialism" at every opportunity.
We have a Commerce Clause not a common offense or general warfare clause.Epic. At every single turn, President Trump continues to be vindicated.
View attachment 127992“Walls work — just ask Israel.” - President Trump
Trump Tells Reporters: ‘Walls Work - Just Ask Israel’ - Breitbart
You have to be able to recognize it, first, right winger.That's left-wing ideology, snowflake. Right-wing ideology "ditches" fascism for liberty.the right wing prefers to, "ditch capitalism" for their "national socialism" at every opportunity.
Exactly. And you don't. That's why I stepped in and set the record straight.You have to be able to recognize it, first, right winger.That's left-wing ideology, snowflake. Right-wing ideology "ditches" fascism for liberty.the right wing prefers to, "ditch capitalism" for their "national socialism" at every opportunity.
