Truth Social Accused of Stiffing Internet Hosting Firm Out of $1.6 Million

[Indeependent]

wow so many!

As opposed to less than 10K for CNN or MSNBC.

 

[SavannahMann]

Because on the face they looked legitimate. In those states, no signature verifications or ID were provided. Dozens of people living at the same nonexistent single family home address and things like that.

One Jurisdiction investigated all claims. Guess what they found?

Vigilantes claimed voter fraud. A thousand false leads later, investigators found one case

The Riverside County investigation illustrates the challenge authorities face when dealing with allegations of massive voter fraud.

www.latimes.com

 

[The Duke]

One Jurisdiction investigated all claims. Guess what they found?

Vigilantes claimed voter fraud. A thousand false leads later, investigators found one case

The Riverside County investigation illustrates the challenge authorities face when dealing with allegations of massive voter fraud.

www.latimes.com

In CA, really? Democrats have had the voting system there corrupted for decades. Drop boxes and ballot harvesting is legal there.

Really CA should lose all of their electoral votes until they clean up their voting system.

 

[SavannahMann]

In CA, really? Democrats have had the voting system there corrupted for decades. Drop boxes and ballot harvesting is legal there.

Really CA should lose all of their electoral votes until they clean up their voting system.

Claims were that people voted twice. They found one person out of a thousand reported fraud’s who had actually voted twice.

There were hundreds of reports of dead people voting. The Investigators checked and even held mirrors under the noses and found the dead people were very much alive.

There were people at supposed non existent addresses. The Investigators found them easily enough.

All the claims were checked. Every single one. They found one valid claim. One.

That is the only full and complete investigation. One where cops actually investigated each report of a crime. And you don’t like it because it didn’t turn out the way you want.

Texas showed a dramatic increase in Democratic Voters. Texas. So obviously this was the result of fraud right? Why didn’t Texas find any proof? The only way to explain an increase in Democratic Voters is Fraud right?

Or is Texas moving closer to being a Purple state?

 

[The Duke]

Claims were that people voted twice. They found one person out of a thousand reported fraud’s who had actually voted twice.

There were hundreds of reports of dead people voting. The Investigators checked and even held mirrors under the noses and found the dead people were very much alive.

There were people at supposed non existent addresses. The Investigators found them easily enough.

All the claims were checked. Every single one. They found one valid claim. One.

That is the only full and complete investigation. One where cops actually investigated each report of a crime. And you don’t like it because it didn’t turn out the way you want.

Texas showed a dramatic increase in Democratic Voters. Texas. So obviously this was the result of fraud right? Why didn’t Texas find any proof? The only way to explain an increase in Democratic Voters is Fraud right?

Or is Texas moving closer to being a Purple state?

Alive in a nursing home and mentally incompetent? Yeah, Democrats harvest votes like that.

 

[Indeependent]

Alive in a nursing home and mentally incompetent? Yeah, Democrats harvest votes like that.

Big time.

 

[The Duke]

Really? Someone took advantage of Trump's ignorance? I thought you conservatives were telling us how great of a businessman he was. Guess he isn't, eh?

Trump's old. The chances of him being very internet savvy are slim.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Trump's old. The chances of him being very internet savvy are slim.

Luckily for him he only hires the best and the brightest.

 

[The Duke]

Luckily for him he only hires the best and the brightest.

Yeah, that hasn't held to be the case.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yeah, that hasn't held to be the case.

Ya think?

 

[ABikerSailor]

Trump's old. The chances of him being very internet savvy are slim.

Then why in the hell did you idiots believe that he was such a great businessman? Either he's a great businessman or he's old and not internet savvy (incidentally, if you aren't internet savvy, or have people whom you trust working for you who are, you can't do very good in the business world in this day and age). What's more, even in spite of a very demonstrated failure, why do you continue to defend him?

 

[Indeependent]

Then why in the hell did you idiots believe that he was such a great businessman? Either he's a great businessman or he's old and not internet savvy (incidentally, if you aren't internet savvy, or have people whom you trust working for you who are, you can't do very good in the business world in this day and age). What's more, even in spite of a very demonstrated failure, why do you continue to defend him?

One has to be Internet savvy to send and read e-mail?
Really?!

 

[ABikerSailor]

One has to be Internet savvy to send and read e-mail?
Really?!

Not to send and read e-mail, but if a person is a great business person in this day and age, they MUST have at least a decent working knowledge about how the internet works, as most of the advertising and quite a bit of sales are internet based nowadays. And even if you aren't internet savvy, you MUST have someone working for you that you trust who is, or your businesses will not do very well.

 

[Indeependent]

Not to send and read e-mail, but if a person is a great business person in this day and age, they MUST have at least a decent working knowledge about how the internet works, as most of the advertising and quite a bit of sales are internet based nowadays. And even if you aren't internet savvy, you MUST have someone working for you that you trust who is, or your businesses will not do very well.

Billionaires assign other people to do their back office work.
Billionaires meet each other face to face.

 

[The Duke]

Then why in the hell did you idiots believe that he was such a great businessman? Either he's a great businessman or he's old and not internet savvy (incidentally, if you aren't internet savvy, or have people whom you trust working for you who are, you can't do very good in the business world in this day and age). What's more, even in spite of a very demonstrated failure, why do you continue to defend him?

That's a false dichotomy cooked up in your mind.

There are many other possibilities than the obtuse ones you presented.

Here's another example of the same thing:

Either you're a douchebag idiot or a cocksmokin' faggot!

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[bodecea]

Question. If the Hosting Facility shuts down Truth website and services for nonpayment of bills. Is that a result of a grand conspiracy of the Left trying to silence Trump? Or is it the normal business practice in the real world where people expect payment for services rendered?

Then the MAGA-thugs will dox and threaten workers/owners of the hosting facility.

 

[bodecea]

It would be nice if someone was concerned about inflation and open borders. Are those things out of league?

What open borders?

 

[The Duke]

Then the MAGA-thugs will dox and threaten workers/owners of the hosting facility.

You're attributing tactics of your side to people that rarely use them.

The reality is that Truth Social sucked and they didn't earn more than $30-$50k

 

[The Duke]

What open borders?

The ones you should buried up to your neck at so all the illegals coming across could step on your head.