🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

USA's "gun problem"

We have more guns than criminals have hands, how could they all be used for murder?
One gun used for murder is one gun too many.

If it saves one life, a complete confiscation is justified

While you mean well you need to consider some things. The gun nuts won't all give up their guns. Some might need to be killed to get them. And criminals certainly won't give them up.

And if you look at other countries who have done what you want homicide rates haven't gone down.

We should do a few things but confiscation I don't think so.
We confiscated handguns in 1996, and everything worked out fine.

Australia confiscated guns in 1996 as well and everything worked out fine.

If Murica' can put a man on the moon, they can successfully get rid of handguns and assault rifles in private hands

Did homicide rates go down?
Gun crime did. And gun crime is preventable. You can;t ban kitchen knives or cricket bats, but guns serve no positive purpose in society, and therefore, gun crime is the most preventable type of crime

So you spend time, money and possibly lives banning guns, but the same number of people still are killed each year? Wouldn't the effort be better spent somewhere else?
 
You gun nuts dont care about innocent people being shot as long as you have your metal death dildoes to stick up your arses
Have you noticed that whenever these fanatical big-govt pushers can't refute the truth, they start thinking about sex toys and people's "arses" instead?

Happens every time.

:rolleyes-41:
 
One gun used for murder is one gun too many.

If it saves one life, a complete confiscation is justified

While you mean well you need to consider some things. The gun nuts won't all give up their guns. Some might need to be killed to get them. And criminals certainly won't give them up.

And if you look at other countries who have done what you want homicide rates haven't gone down.

We should do a few things but confiscation I don't think so.
We confiscated handguns in 1996, and everything worked out fine.

Australia confiscated guns in 1996 as well and everything worked out fine.

If Murica' can put a man on the moon, they can successfully get rid of handguns and assault rifles in private hands

Did homicide rates go down?
Gun crime did. And gun crime is preventable. You can;t ban kitchen knives or cricket bats, but guns serve no positive purpose in society, and therefore, gun crime is the most preventable type of crime

So you spend time, money and possibly lives banning guns, but the same number of people still are killed each year? Wouldn't the effort be better spent somewhere else?
Repeat after me:

guns have ZERO positive uses in society. ZERO. ZILCH.

Gun murders are the only type of murders that are really preventable. We can;t ban kitchen knives or cars. But we can ban guns.

We are cutting down the numbers of PREVENTABLE murders by banning guns, which is a very very good thing in my book
 
Repeat after me:

guns have ZERO positive uses in society. ZERO. ZILCH.
(yawn) Already refuted, in this thread and elsewhere in this forum.

But as I said, when the big-govt hysteric gets disproved and can't refute the truth, he simply ignores it and pretends it wasn't pointed out in the first place.

You have to wonder: Who does this person think he's fooling? I mean, the evidence is right here, and the people he's screeching at have already read it.....

These gun-right-hating people apparently have serious mental problems.
 
While you mean well you need to consider some things. The gun nuts won't all give up their guns. Some might need to be killed to get them. And criminals certainly won't give them up.

And if you look at other countries who have done what you want homicide rates haven't gone down.

We should do a few things but confiscation I don't think so.
We confiscated handguns in 1996, and everything worked out fine.

Australia confiscated guns in 1996 as well and everything worked out fine.

If Murica' can put a man on the moon, they can successfully get rid of handguns and assault rifles in private hands

Did homicide rates go down?
Gun crime did. And gun crime is preventable. You can;t ban kitchen knives or cricket bats, but guns serve no positive purpose in society, and therefore, gun crime is the most preventable type of crime

So you spend time, money and possibly lives banning guns, but the same number of people still are killed each year? Wouldn't the effort be better spent somewhere else?
Repeat after me:

guns have ZERO positive uses in society. ZERO. ZILCH.

Gun murders are the only type of murders that are really preventable. We can;t ban kitchen knives or cars. But we can ban guns.

We are cutting down the numbers of PREVENTABLE murders by banning guns, which is a very very good thing in my book

So rather than shot the person is knifed to death? Show that a ban has lowered homicide rates and you have an argument. Otherwise the effort and money is better spent on something else.
 
guns serve no positive purpose in society, and therefore, gun crime is the most preventable type of crime
(sigh) Is there no limit to this person's blindness and ignorance?

USA s gun problem Page 3 US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum
You gun nuts dont care about innocent people being shot as long as you have your metal death dildoes to stick up your arses







And yet not one of us has screamed out wishing for an innocent person to be raped and murdered such as you did. I think we ALL KNOW, who the deranged nut is. And you're looking at him in the mirror.
 
If we take away gang related murders in American no-go zones and trailer parks...you would see there is no problem. Most of the murdered aren't innocent souls...they are gang bangers and drug addicts playing a game that is defined as dangerous.
 
We confiscated handguns in 1996, and everything worked out fine.

Australia confiscated guns in 1996 as well and everything worked out fine.

If Murica' can put a man on the moon, they can successfully get rid of handguns and assault rifles in private hands

Did homicide rates go down?
Gun crime did. And gun crime is preventable. You can;t ban kitchen knives or cricket bats, but guns serve no positive purpose in society, and therefore, gun crime is the most preventable type of crime

So you spend time, money and possibly lives banning guns, but the same number of people still are killed each year? Wouldn't the effort be better spent somewhere else?
Repeat after me:

guns have ZERO positive uses in society. ZERO. ZILCH.

Gun murders are the only type of murders that are really preventable. We can;t ban kitchen knives or cars. But we can ban guns.

We are cutting down the numbers of PREVENTABLE murders by banning guns, which is a very very good thing in my book

So rather than shot the person is knifed to death? Show that a ban has lowered homicide rates and you have an argument. Otherwise the effort and money is better spent on something else.

Its hard to prevent knife murders, but whats clear is that banning guns reduces gun crime. Gun crime is the only form of crime thats completely PREVENTABLE.

Wouldn't you say that getting rid of something that has no beneficial use to society, and stopping many high profile incidents such as Sandy Hook, as well as showing the world how civilised you are, is a good use of money?
 
Did homicide rates go down?
Gun crime did. And gun crime is preventable. You can;t ban kitchen knives or cricket bats, but guns serve no positive purpose in society, and therefore, gun crime is the most preventable type of crime

So you spend time, money and possibly lives banning guns, but the same number of people still are killed each year? Wouldn't the effort be better spent somewhere else?
Repeat after me:

guns have ZERO positive uses in society. ZERO. ZILCH.

Gun murders are the only type of murders that are really preventable. We can;t ban kitchen knives or cars. But we can ban guns.

We are cutting down the numbers of PREVENTABLE murders by banning guns, which is a very very good thing in my book

So rather than shot the person is knifed to death? Show that a ban has lowered homicide rates and you have an argument. Otherwise the effort and money is better spent on something else.

Its hard to prevent knife murders, but whats clear is that banning guns reduces gun crime. Gun crime is the only form of crime thats completely PREVENTABLE.

Wouldn't you say that getting rid of something that has no beneficial use to society, and stopping many high profile incidents such as Sandy Hook, as well as showing the world how civilised you are, is a good use of money?





Tell that to the English.. They are actively trying to ban pointed kitchen knives. Proving that yet again stupid people, such as yourself, will ignore the perpetrator and concentrate instead on the tool used because the tool is easier to try and control than criminal behavior.

Typical ignorant twat.
 
You're so wrong. America has gun problem, and the situation is extremely out of control. It seems like the US is at war, and that the state of being at war allows one to shoot other persons.
America does not have a gun problem.

America has a feral youth problem.
 
Did homicide rates go down?
Gun crime did. And gun crime is preventable. You can;t ban kitchen knives or cricket bats, but guns serve no positive purpose in society, and therefore, gun crime is the most preventable type of crime

So you spend time, money and possibly lives banning guns, but the same number of people still are killed each year? Wouldn't the effort be better spent somewhere else?
Repeat after me:

guns have ZERO positive uses in society. ZERO. ZILCH.

Gun murders are the only type of murders that are really preventable. We can;t ban kitchen knives or cars. But we can ban guns.

We are cutting down the numbers of PREVENTABLE murders by banning guns, which is a very very good thing in my book

So rather than shot the person is knifed to death? Show that a ban has lowered homicide rates and you have an argument. Otherwise the effort and money is better spent on something else.

Its hard to prevent knife murders, but whats clear is that banning guns reduces gun crime. Gun crime is the only form of crime thats completely PREVENTABLE.

Wouldn't you say that getting rid of something that has no beneficial use to society, and stopping many high profile incidents such as Sandy Hook, as well as showing the world how civilised you are, is a good use of money?

Yes if I thought it would work. But from everything I have seen you just trade gun murder for some other kind of murder. No lives are really being saved. I'd rather see the money and effort go into cancer or auto accidents.
 
If we take away gang related murders in American no-go zones and trailer parks...you would see there is no problem. Most of the murdered aren't innocent souls...they are gang bangers and drug addicts playing a game that is defined as dangerous.
The children at Sandy Hook were gangbangers?

Fuck you you inbred hillbilly Tea Party gun nut. I hope you go crazy and shoot your family with your guns.
:lol: I am far from a tea party supporter...but I do support the 2nd Amendment. It is shameful that every American doesn't own a gun.

As for the mass shooting incidents you speak of...i agree. The white people need to address this phenomenom among their people. I think it is a family thing...bad fathers and all. They should address it.
 
Yo, RayneWooney, another dummy! I can talk anyway I wish, this is America last I checked!!! If you wannabe Socialist had half a brain, you would be dangerous! Guns are American, without them, our(talking about real Americans) ""Forefathers"" would have been wiped out fool!!!
 
Stop holding the gun industry's water, this is a gun problem.

In the UK, we have almost zero guns, and almost zero gun murder.

And stop with your bullshit "more violent crime" argument. I'd much rather be raped or mugged than shot. Rape lasts two seconds, death is permanent.


You probably vacation in Sweden....the rape capitol of Europe..............
Probably the reason he goes there.
 
Yo, RayneWooney, another dummy! I can talk anyway I wish, this is America last I checked!!! If you wannabe Socialist had half a brain, you would be dangerous! Guns are American, without them, our(talking about real Americans) ""Forefathers"" would have been wiped out fool!!!
Did he just get banned while I was in the thread?

I didn't notice that when I clicked on this thread.
 
Yo, RayneWooney, another dummy! I can talk anyway I wish, this is America last I checked!!! If you wannabe Socialist had half a brain, you would be dangerous! Guns are American, without them, our(talking about real Americans) ""Forefathers"" would have been wiped out fool!!!
Did he just get banned while I was in the thread?

I didn't notice that when I clicked on this thread.






Yup. He made a particularly vile family attack so I gave him a week off.
 
You're so wrong. America has gun problem, and the situation is extremely out of control. It seems like the US is at war, and that the state of being at war allows one to shoot other persons.
America does not have a gun problem.

America has a feral youth problem.
9krDTnA.png
 
Yo, RayneWooney, another dummy! I can talk anyway I wish, this is America last I checked!!! If you wannabe Socialist had half a brain, you would be dangerous! Guns are American, without them, our(talking about real Americans) ""Forefathers"" would have been wiped out fool!!!
Did he just get banned while I was in the thread?

I didn't notice that when I clicked on this thread.






Yup. He made a particularly vile family attack so I gave him a week off.
Well thank you.

I'd like to see a public stockade at this forum, where the banned and temporarily banned were listed, with a reason for the ban.

It would be interesting and enlightening.
 
The problem?
Yes. 99.99705% of guns are nout used to commit murder.
How does this support the claim that the number of guns in the US is a problem?
Maybe if guns were banned...
99.99705% of guns are not used to commit murder. How does it make sense to ban guns?
To prevent the other one percent from being used to kill.
You want to ban more than 38000 guns because someone misused 1?
This, to you is a rational reasoned solution?

You also failed to answer this question:
99.99705% of guns are nott used to commit murder.
How does this support the claim that the number of guns in the US is a problem?

We have more guns than criminals have hands, how could they all be used for murder?
One gun used for murder is one gun too many.

If it saves one life, a complete confiscation is justified
Rayne...do you realize that guns save lives and stop violent criminal attack 1.6 million times a year on average here in the states....so 1.6 million lives are saved in one way or another with guns...
 

Forum List

Back
Top