We Finally Know the Case Against Trump, and It Is Strong

[bripat9643]

On cohens felonies? It sure does.

If a squealing trumpling wants to claim,in court, that Cohen did not commit the felonies, it has to be done on cohen's behalf in a court of appeals.

If Trump's gang of criminal lawyers tries it in his trial, they will be warned or penalized by the judge.

You obviously don't know squat about the law, so why are you spouting off about it?

 

[Winco]

He will take the stand and plead the 5th. Then his lying supporters will say he isn't actually guilty of anything, but he is just worried the corrupt jury and corrupt judge and corrupt prosecutor will send him to jail for talking about the weather.

Probably.
But he might snap.
Just get him in the courtroom, even if he 'intends to' take the 5th, he might snap if prodded correctly, which I'm positive the prosecutor knows how to get under trumps thin skin.

Get him on the stand, by ANY means.

Not a lie.

It's ALL lies from the right.

Dang you whine a lot. It's kind of embarrassing.

It's all he's got.
Fun to watch him squirm, the trial is going to be epic.

 

[WorldWatcher]

How is it an in-kind contribution?

It was made to benefit the campaign.

After Access Hollywood Clinton was up in the national polls. Cohen, Pencer (AMI Media), Weisseilberg (TO CFO) and Trump (Candidate) put together the catch-n-kill scheme to benefit the campaign by keep other stories out of the press.

Problem isn't the NDA and paying for the NDA. Their problem was illegally (alledgedly) hiding the transactions in business ledgers.

WW

 

[Winco]

Dim talking points and they are all provenlies.

Give 3 proven lies.

1)
2)
3)

Honestly, I'd settle for 1)

 

[bripat9643]

Explain how.

Whether Cohen was convicted is one issue. Whether the NDA was an in-kind donation is another. One doesn't prove the other. Got it, dumbass?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Whether Cohen was convicted is one issue. Whether the NDA was an in-kind donation is another.

Oops, you confused yourself. I didn't mention anything about the NDA.

 

[bripat9643]

It was made to benefit the campaign.

After Access Hollywood Clinton was up in the national polls. Cohen, Pencer (AMI Media), Weisseilberg (TO CFO) and Trump (Candidate) put together the catch-n-kill scheme to benefit the campaign by keep other stories out of the press.

Problem isn't the NDA and paying for the NDA. Their problem was illegally (alledgedly) hiding the transactions in business ledgers.

WW

Everything in your post is wrong. You're pegging the stupid meter.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

It was made to benefit the campaign.

After Access Hollywood Clinton was up in the national polls. Cohen, Pencer (AMI Media), Weisseilberg (TO CFO) and Trump (Candidate) put together the catch-n-kill scheme to benefit the campaign by keep other stories out of the press.

Problem isn't the NDA and paying for the NDA. Their problem was illegally (alledgedly) hiding the transactions in business ledgers.

WW

It was made to benefit the campaign.

How?

the catch-n-kill scheme to benefit the campaign by keep other stories out of the press.

Stopping negative stories is a benefit? What about publishing positive stories?

Problem isn't the NDA and paying for the NDA.

You said it was a benefit.

 

[bripat9643]

Oops, you confused yourself. I didn't mention anything about the NDA.

Spare me. You din't mention the fact that you're a moron either.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The FEC has ruled otherise, you dumb asshole.

Cohen was convicted in Federal District Court. The FEC was not involved in Cohens case.

WW

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Everything in your post is wrong.

Now argue why, using your big boy words.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Spare me. You ddin't mention the fact that you're a moron either.

That's what I thought. Just another confused Trumpling.

 

[WorldWatcher]

It was made to benefit the campaign.

How?

the catch-n-kill scheme to benefit the campaign by keep other stories out of the press.

Stopping negative stories is a benefit? What about publishing positive stories?

See the post you quoted.

But yes. That is what Cohen was charged and convicted of. As to positive stories? Good question, if they are generally available to the media and widely reported, probably not. If they are campaign materials bought and paid for by the campaign, probably not.

WW

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

What an embarrassing display. We have the toddster sea lioning his little heart out, and Bri pad Throwing a grade a hissy fit using the only words he knows, half of which are vulgarities. If this is what trump is bringing to the trial, he doesn't stand a chance.

 

[WorldWatcher]

That doesn't make it a ruling on the matter, you fucking dumbass. I've already show that the contents of a plea bargain cannot be used as evidence in other trials

Sorry, yes it does. Cohen admitted to it in court before the judge.

And no, your claims of "showing" has not impact on the real world.

WW

 

[WorldWatcher]

You're only proving that you don't know your ass from a hole in the ground. You progs are just regurgitating Dim talking points and they are all provenlies. You're proving that you are all scumbags. Whenever you repeat on of these, all the sensible people reading your post just thinks "what a scumbag."

You know the difference between a Ham Sandwich and Trump?
.
.
.
.
.
A Ham Sandwich has never been indicted by the Manhattan DA on felony charges.

WW

 

[bripat9643]

Sorry, yes it does. Cohen admitted to it in court before the judge.

And no, your claims of "showing" has not impact on the real world.

WW

No it doesn't. As usual, your post contains nothing but idiocies

I can "admit" that pie is equal to 4. That doesn't make it a fact.

 

[bripat9643]

You know the difference between a Ham Sandwich and Trump?
.
.
.
.
.
A Ham Sandwich has never been indicted by the Manhattan DA on felony charges.

WW

Did you have a point of some kind, moron?

 

[WorldWatcher]

Did you have a point of some kind, moron?

Ya, you can hem and haw all you want.

But at the end of the day Trump is still under indictment and the legal process will play out. We are at the indictment/arraignment stage and there is a long road ahead. We in the public sphere actually have very little information to go from via source materials (i.e. the indictment, Statement of Facts, and arraignment proceedings). It's going to get a lot more interesting as more details come out as part of pre-trial motions. Then when we (and if) we get to Trial life will be a hoot.

WW

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

See the post you quoted.

But yes. That is what Cohen was charged and convicted of. As to positive stories? Good question, if they are generally available to the media and widely reported, probably not. If they are campaign materials bought and paid for by the campaign, probably not.

WW

As to positive stories? Good question, if they are generally available to the media and widely reported, probably not.

A publisher spends $150,000 to get a negative story, doesn't publish, illegal benefit to Trump?

A publisher spends $150,000 to get a negative story, does publish, illegal benefit to Hillary?