bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,163
- 47,312
- 2,180
Wrong. Otherwise Genghis Khan is capitalism. Armed robbery is how socialism operates.Not at all.
Since capitalism is only the PROFIT motivation, transactions do NOT at all have to be voluntary. When a robber holds up a bank, that obviously is pure capitalism.
Hardly. Socialism can exist without the use of force.Socialism is the oppositive of force, because socialism is where an individual does not do something on their own, for profit, and instead get input and shared resources into the project, with the expectation of shared results.
Anyone who things socialism is at all involuntary, does not at all have even the vaguest clue.
When has it ever been voluntary?