When the Voice of People Vote GOP...But 90% of Media is Liberal, Something is Wrong

I know you cannot be typing that with a straight face. Y out u nominated and elected a fucking reality TV personality that offered no policy beyond "it'll be great, beeeeeeleeeeeve me"

The Democrats had to rig their Primaries, engage in election fraud during their Primaries, and cheat during debates in order to help a corrupt, criminal - who was under multiple FBI investigations days before the election - for crimes it was proven later she DID commit - defeat Bernie Sanders, who she would not have beaten without their help, and take the nomination she was being GIVEN despite the majority will of the Democratic Party base.

HER campaign message was, "I am a woman, I am not Donald Trump, and it's my turn'.

As a result, the worst candidate in US history lost to that 'reality tv personality', becoming just another statistic in the 1,000+ elections the DNC has continued to lose.

:clap:.
Hillary wasn't the worst candidate in history. She was the most maligned. The worst Candidates were Reagan, Bush and Trump and they went on to become the worst presidents.
 
So local issues attract Republicans, national issues attract Democrats.



No

Policy attracts Republicans

Popularity attracts Democrats



.
Yea, policy to screw over as many Americans as possible. No one here can name a single GOP policy that has helped the majority of Americans in the last 50 years or more. For the GOP it's all about screwing over the middle class and the poor and cutting taxes for billionaires.


EPA stupid shit for one.



Obama/Regan phone for two



Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA, for three


Roe vs Wade for four....



Want me to go on?




.
Yea, go on.

EPA, started in 1970, GOP wants to abolish it.

GOP Senator Vitter and GOP Rep. Griffin have already introduced bills to end the phone program.

Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA was created in 1986 and is an UNFUNDED MANDATE.

Roe vs Wade was decided in 1973 by judges who had been sitting on the court for how long before that?

Yea, go on, show us GOP success. Because I'm LAUGHING at you. Get it? I'm LAUGHING.


You asked a question and I answered, did those programs not help the poor and everyone?


A simple yes or no answer ...



.
 
Hillary wasn't the worst candidate in history. She was the most maligned.
upload_2017-5-18_9-8-34.jpeg

Hillary was the 1st candidate in US history allowed to remain in the race while under multiple FBI investigations - for crimes that included Espionage - just days before the election, only to be later declared guilty of multiple crimes by the Director of the FBI testifying before Congress while under oath.

Comey testified to this AFTER the election. Let's say Hillary wins the election - Comey testifies Hillary broke laws - PRESIDENT Hillary Clinton is then immediately Impeached for breaking numerous US laws regarding the handling of classified information and for jeopardizing national security. Hillary, and the country, was spared all of that thanks to Trump beating that corrupt ass. :p
 
So if 61% of Americans are represented by GOP state governments, how is it that Trump couldn't beat Hillary in the popular vote?
Because we have federalism that allows for states rights and Constituion allows states to run their own election process.

So local issues attract Republicans, national issues attract Democrats.



No

Policy attracts Republicans

Popularity attracts Democrats



.

I know you cannot be typing that with a straight face. Y out u nominated and elected a fucking reality TV personality that offered no policy beyond "it'll be great, beeeeeeleeeeeve me"



Jobs

Get rid of illegals

Repeal Obama care

Elect a right wing Supreme court justice

Put the brakes on the EPA

Support small business

Support the police

Bomb countries that use WMDs/chemical weapons on its civilians

Stop promoting junk science Man made climate change



Want more?




.
Yea, because I'm still laughing.
Let's go over these new ones:

Jobs - 87% of manufacturing jobs were automated. They didn't go anywhere, they went away. There are over 5 million jobs availible from under Obama and unemployment is at 4.7%. Republicans aren't bringing back jobs. It's a lie, a lie. Get it? A lie.

Get rid of illegals - That's gonna hurt the country more than help it. Republicans have already devastated agriculture and farming all across Red States with their draconian policies.

Repeal Obama care - because ending healthcare for millions is a great help. Ask any tard. They'll tell you. Meanwhile, coal miners are freaking out since they were notified in March their health care is ending.

Elect a right wing Supreme court justice - they are appointed and not elected. And we've seen how well that's worked out in the last 30 years.

Put the brakes on the EPA - You just touted that as a GOP accomplishment. Make up you mind.

Support small business - what support? Imaginary support?

Support the police - making them enemies in their communities is not support. Explain how Republicans support police.

Bomb countries that use WMDs/chemical weapons on its civilians - bomb the civilians to save them from chemical weapons. Have you thought this through?

Stop promoting junk science Man made climate change - 6% of scientists are Republican. About 6% of scientists don't believe in climate change. No surprise there.

You are f*cking delusional. That is the most pathetic list I have ever seen on the USMB.

q0Mx7.gif


There, I've administered some reality.
 
No

Policy attracts Republicans

Popularity attracts Democrats



.
Yea, policy to screw over as many Americans as possible. No one here can name a single GOP policy that has helped the majority of Americans in the last 50 years or more. For the GOP it's all about screwing over the middle class and the poor and cutting taxes for billionaires.


EPA stupid shit for one.



Obama/Regan phone for two



Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA, for three


Roe vs Wade for four....



Want me to go on?




.
Yea, go on.

EPA, started in 1970, GOP wants to abolish it.

GOP Senator Vitter and GOP Rep. Griffin have already introduced bills to end the phone program.

Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act, or EMTALA was created in 1986 and is an UNFUNDED MANDATE.

Roe vs Wade was decided in 1973 by judges who had been sitting on the court for how long before that?

Yea, go on, show us GOP success. Because I'm LAUGHING at you. Get it? I'm LAUGHING.


You asked a question and I answered, did those programs not help the poor and everyone?


A simple yes or no answer ...



.
NASA was started by the GOP.
The Interstate Highway was built by the GOP.

But that was when the GOP was filled with liberals.
Look at what the GOP did under Bush.

The greatest redistribution of wealth in the history of the world called the deficit creating Bush Tax cuts. Two unfunded wars. Letting Bin Laden go.
They used reconciliation THREE times. Can you remember on what?

And then promising to ruin the administration of the first black president. Thank God they failed.

The GOP blocked any meaningful investigation of BP after the terrible Gulf Oil Spill and complained when Obama managed to get 20 billion from BP to pay for cleanup.

And what do they want to do under Trump?
Cut healthcare for tens of millions.
And infrastructure spending? Democrats have been trying to do that for decades. Republicans squeeze every cent out of this economy so they can give billionaires tax cuts. Even you know that. All Republicans know that.
 
What I want to know is how does WAPO and the NY Times stay in business? Are there that many people that own parakeets?
Amazing any idiot would buy or subscribe to their media outlet.

Idiots don't subscribe to or read any media. Those who seek FACTS, read a variety of media to get a variety of takes on the story.

MSM bias has been pegged at 7% which is a slight bias. Anyone who thinks the media is 90% liberal is too stupid to be one person.
Lmfao. Media has been exposed for decades as liberal biased.

No it hasn't. CONSERVATIVE media tells you the MSM is biased and not to be trusted, but they're eggagerating the extent of that bias so idiots like you won't listen to facts.

Conservatives don't fact check ever. Conservative media, is rabidly biased and lies constantly because YOU like what you hear.

Pull your head out of your ass and fact check.
 
Last edited:
So if 61% of Americans are represented by GOP state governments, how is it that Trump couldn't beat Hillary in the popular vote?
Because we have federalism that allows for states rights and Constituion allows states to run their own election process.

So local issues attract Republicans, national issues attract Democrats.



No

Policy attracts Republicans

Popularity attracts Democrats



.

I know you cannot be typing that with a straight face. Y out u nominated and elected a fucking reality TV personality that offered no policy beyond "it'll be great, beeeeeeleeeeeve me"



Jobs

Get rid of illegals

Repeal Obama care

Elect a right wing Supreme court justice

Put the brakes on the EPA

Support small business

Support the police

Bomb countries that use WMDs/chemical weapons on its civilians

Stop promoting junk science Man made climate change



Want more?




.

Those aren't policies, they're bumper stickers.

The real loser of the 2016 campaign is policy | Brookings Institution

But cries of foul from the policy analysts have fallen on deaf ears. Each time Trump makes a ludicrous suggestion, these experts fill the airwaves with their reasoned arguments against it, Trump ignores them, and his poll ratings go up. Every time an establishment expert attacks one of his proposals, his anti-establishment credentials are burnished.

Meanwhile, the uber-wonk of the Republican field, Jeb Bush, became a piece of political marginalia. He produced some thoughtful and sensible policy ideas, on student financing, economic growth, health care, energy, school reform, and so on. Look where that got him.[...]

But just as the unhinged ideas from Trump are doing nothing to dampen his fans, so the unrealistic ones from Sanders are not putting off his core supporters. And just as the scorn of the establishment helps Trump, so the attacks from experts on the mainstream left on Sanders’ ideas bolster his image as a revolutionary idealist, refusing to accept the status quo.


The real loser of the 2016 campaign is policy | Brookings Institution

Donald Trump needs less personality, more policy to get things done
 
Because we have federalism that allows for states rights and Constituion allows states to run their own election process.

So local issues attract Republicans, national issues attract Democrats.



No

Policy attracts Republicans

Popularity attracts Democrats



.

I know you cannot be typing that with a straight face. Y out u nominated and elected a fucking reality TV personality that offered no policy beyond "it'll be great, beeeeeeleeeeeve me"



Jobs

Get rid of illegals

Repeal Obama care

Elect a right wing Supreme court justice

Put the brakes on the EPA

Support small business

Support the police

Bomb countries that use WMDs/chemical weapons on its civilians

Stop promoting junk science Man made climate change



Want more?




.

Those aren't policies, they're bumper stickers.

The real loser of the 2016 campaign is policy | Brookings Institution

But cries of foul from the policy analysts have fallen on deaf ears. Each time Trump makes a ludicrous suggestion, these experts fill the airwaves with their reasoned arguments against it, Trump ignores them, and his poll ratings go up. Every time an establishment expert attacks one of his proposals, his anti-establishment credentials are burnished.

Meanwhile, the uber-wonk of the Republican field, Jeb Bush, became a piece of political marginalia. He produced some thoughtful and sensible policy ideas, on student financing, economic growth, health care, energy, school reform, and so on. Look where that got him.[...]

But just as the unhinged ideas from Trump are doing nothing to dampen his fans, so the unrealistic ones from Sanders are not putting off his core supporters. And just as the scorn of the establishment helps Trump, so the attacks from experts on the mainstream left on Sanders’ ideas bolster his image as a revolutionary idealist, refusing to accept the status quo.


The real loser of the 2016 campaign is policy | Brookings Institution

Donald Trump needs less personality, more policy to get things done



You asked a question and those are more then number stickers...


It's not my fault you guys want uneducated voters , but I see your point if you did have educated voters they would start voting for policy..


You guys would never be able to hold office again.




.
 
So local issues attract Republicans, national issues attract Democrats.



No

Policy attracts Republicans

Popularity attracts Democrats



.

I know you cannot be typing that with a straight face. Y out u nominated and elected a fucking reality TV personality that offered no policy beyond "it'll be great, beeeeeeleeeeeve me"



Jobs

Get rid of illegals

Repeal Obama care

Elect a right wing Supreme court justice

Put the brakes on the EPA

Support small business

Support the police

Bomb countries that use WMDs/chemical weapons on its civilians

Stop promoting junk science Man made climate change



Want more?




.

Those aren't policies, they're bumper stickers.

The real loser of the 2016 campaign is policy | Brookings Institution

But cries of foul from the policy analysts have fallen on deaf ears. Each time Trump makes a ludicrous suggestion, these experts fill the airwaves with their reasoned arguments against it, Trump ignores them, and his poll ratings go up. Every time an establishment expert attacks one of his proposals, his anti-establishment credentials are burnished.

Meanwhile, the uber-wonk of the Republican field, Jeb Bush, became a piece of political marginalia. He produced some thoughtful and sensible policy ideas, on student financing, economic growth, health care, energy, school reform, and so on. Look where that got him.[...]

But just as the unhinged ideas from Trump are doing nothing to dampen his fans, so the unrealistic ones from Sanders are not putting off his core supporters. And just as the scorn of the establishment helps Trump, so the attacks from experts on the mainstream left on Sanders’ ideas bolster his image as a revolutionary idealist, refusing to accept the status quo.


The real loser of the 2016 campaign is policy | Brookings Institution

Donald Trump needs less personality, more policy to get things done



You asked a question and those are more then number stickers...


It's not my fault you guys want uneducated voters , but I see your point if you did have educated voters they would start voting for policy..


You guys would never be able to hold office again.




.
If it's under 20 words, it's not a policy, it's a "bumper sticker". Try to figure out why.
 
No

Policy attracts Republicans

Popularity attracts Democrats



.

I know you cannot be typing that with a straight face. Y out u nominated and elected a fucking reality TV personality that offered no policy beyond "it'll be great, beeeeeeleeeeeve me"



Jobs

Get rid of illegals

Repeal Obama care

Elect a right wing Supreme court justice

Put the brakes on the EPA

Support small business

Support the police

Bomb countries that use WMDs/chemical weapons on its civilians

Stop promoting junk science Man made climate change



Want more?




.

Those aren't policies, they're bumper stickers.

The real loser of the 2016 campaign is policy | Brookings Institution

But cries of foul from the policy analysts have fallen on deaf ears. Each time Trump makes a ludicrous suggestion, these experts fill the airwaves with their reasoned arguments against it, Trump ignores them, and his poll ratings go up. Every time an establishment expert attacks one of his proposals, his anti-establishment credentials are burnished.

Meanwhile, the uber-wonk of the Republican field, Jeb Bush, became a piece of political marginalia. He produced some thoughtful and sensible policy ideas, on student financing, economic growth, health care, energy, school reform, and so on. Look where that got him.[...]

But just as the unhinged ideas from Trump are doing nothing to dampen his fans, so the unrealistic ones from Sanders are not putting off his core supporters. And just as the scorn of the establishment helps Trump, so the attacks from experts on the mainstream left on Sanders’ ideas bolster his image as a revolutionary idealist, refusing to accept the status quo.


The real loser of the 2016 campaign is policy | Brookings Institution

Donald Trump needs less personality, more policy to get things done



You asked a question and those are more then number stickers...


It's not my fault you guys want uneducated voters , but I see your point if you did have educated voters they would start voting for policy..


You guys would never be able to hold office again.




.
If it's under 20 words, it's not a policy, it's a "bumper sticker". Try to figure out why.



You going to fucking pay me if you want me to write a novel on it sunshine?



..
 
When the people speak so strongly against them, but the media continues to be a voice box for the socialist/ Democrats, it indicates a huge bias. The liberal media are elites that look down down their noses at little people. The peasant class who they can tell how they should vote.
Republicans now dominate state government, with 32 legislatures and 33 governors
Oh right of course. Republican gerrymandering never happens! Republicans are always noble and love true democracy!
So do the Democrats...but they can't win elections. No support from people.
Republicans do it a lot more.
 
I don't see anything as being wrong that people can see right through the 90% of the media. That 90% is probably its own worse enemy.
 
I know you cannot be typing that with a straight face. Y out u nominated and elected a fucking reality TV personality that offered no policy beyond "it'll be great, beeeeeeleeeeeve me"



Jobs

Get rid of illegals

Repeal Obama care

Elect a right wing Supreme court justice

Put the brakes on the EPA

Support small business

Support the police

Bomb countries that use WMDs/chemical weapons on its civilians

Stop promoting junk science Man made climate change



Want more?




.

Those aren't policies, they're bumper stickers.

The real loser of the 2016 campaign is policy | Brookings Institution

But cries of foul from the policy analysts have fallen on deaf ears. Each time Trump makes a ludicrous suggestion, these experts fill the airwaves with their reasoned arguments against it, Trump ignores them, and his poll ratings go up. Every time an establishment expert attacks one of his proposals, his anti-establishment credentials are burnished.

Meanwhile, the uber-wonk of the Republican field, Jeb Bush, became a piece of political marginalia. He produced some thoughtful and sensible policy ideas, on student financing, economic growth, health care, energy, school reform, and so on. Look where that got him.[...]

But just as the unhinged ideas from Trump are doing nothing to dampen his fans, so the unrealistic ones from Sanders are not putting off his core supporters. And just as the scorn of the establishment helps Trump, so the attacks from experts on the mainstream left on Sanders’ ideas bolster his image as a revolutionary idealist, refusing to accept the status quo.


The real loser of the 2016 campaign is policy | Brookings Institution

Donald Trump needs less personality, more policy to get things done



You asked a question and those are more then number stickers...


It's not my fault you guys want uneducated voters , but I see your point if you did have educated voters they would start voting for policy..


You guys would never be able to hold office again.




.
If it's under 20 words, it's not a policy, it's a "bumper sticker". Try to figure out why.



You going to fucking pay me if you want me to write a novel on it sunshine?



..
Don't forget blowing Putin and Eegen or whatever the fock the Orange Cretin called him. LOL

But imo you are right that Trump had an agenda 48% of the voters voted for. We'll see how much is implemented. He got a gop Justice
 
I have a feeling we're going to see more seats flip blue in the next few years.
You are out of touch with reality. There was a revolt against the establishment in 2016 and Democrats do not get it. This crybaby bullshit helps GOP.

There was a revolt against the Republican establishment in 2016, remember?

The frustration with the mainstream of conservatism, as represented by the Republican party, was so great that the people on the right threw in the towel and nominated a lunatic demagogue who offered nothing but wild, too-good-to-be-true, unfulfillable promises.
There was. It was also a revolt against WashingtonDC and Democratic establishment. But you are ideologically brainwashed.
 
When the people speak so strongly against them, but the media continues to be a voice box for the socialist/ Democrats, it indicates a huge bias. The liberal media are elites that look down down their noses at little people. The peasant class who they can tell how they should vote.
Republicans now dominate state government, with 32 legislatures and 33 governors

Most of Germany was run by Nazis in the 1930s. Doesn't mean they are right. That aside, there are many other things to take into consideration. A lot of people don't vote. In the case of the presidential election more people voted for Hillary. When I first came on this board the conservatives kept on shouting me down about the Tyranny of the Majority and that democracy was two wolves and a sheep deciding on what is for dinner. Now your guys are in charge suddenly it is no longer an issue.
The largest % of vote Nazi Party ever had was 38%. But Goebbles controlled the media.

Yeah, but due to the way their political system works, the minority ruled. A bit like the US with the popular vote. You live in a capitalistic society. The media is run by individuals not the govt.
 
There is no such thing as a liberal media. Liberal media is a myth.

If the media had a liberal bias, then why did Wapo and the NYT help Bush43 sell the Iraq war?

If there was a liberal bias in the media, then why did it give the same amount of "air time" for the pro-Iraq war rally in Washington in 2004, than it did for the anti-war rally in New York that same day?

Pro-Iraq war rally




Anti-war rally




Does that look equal to you? Both got 1:20 of air time. That's one minute and 20 seconds for each. The anti-war rally involved multiple cities all over the world with about 15 million people attending and you think a "liberal media" would've given equal air time to the pro-war tailgate party in the park?

A liberal media wouldn't have given so much air time to all the Barack Obama nonsense about not being born here, being a marxist, being a socialist, he's wants to take away your guns, etc. Those are all lunatic talking points from the right that received substantial air time and coverage. You think a liberal media would do that?

Bush43 is an elitist. All the Bushes are globalist elitists, so is who owns the

media.


Right now they're pushing for ww3 via a 1st strike on N. Korea.

Bad, unnecessary thing to do right now.

The globalists like war, it makes them money.
We have a nation to defend. Iraq War is history. I was opposed to it. North Korea is a significant threat to Asia and United States.
 

Forum List

Back
Top