Why are ranchers considered terrorists but not OWS?

[CaféAuLait]

Who is calling ranchers terrorist other than FOX and the RW media implying or reporting that the LW is calling ranchers terrorist? Sen. Harry said some of the folks supporting Bundy were domestic terrorist. He didn't call ranchers terrorist. So as near as I can tell, nobody is calling ranchers terrorist or linking ranchers with terrorism, except for FOX news and the RW media. If I am mistaken, I would appreciate a link. Thanks in advance.

Cliven Bundy: right-wing extremist domestic terrorist lawbreaker

Cliven Bundy: right-wing extremist domestic terrorist lawbreaker

There is not a sentence in that link calling ranchers terrorist. Not even an implication. The link specifically makes note that Bundy stands alone as a defiant rancher in the area. It mentions that all the other ranchers in the area have cooperated and worked with the BLM. The link points the finger at the Bundy supporters and in no way claims or indicates that those supporters are fellow ranchers.
You have guzzled the FOX NEWS Koolaid.

LOL Please! You just over look the title.. how hilarious!


Cliven Bundy: right-wing extremist domestic terrorist lawbreaker

Did you need to put on glasses? Or are you going to keep trying to wiggle out of that blazing title calling Bundy a Terrorist?

Intellectual dishonesty at its best!

 

[Camp]

Cliven Bundy: right-wing extremist domestic terrorist lawbreaker

Cliven Bundy: right-wing extremist domestic terrorist lawbreaker

There is not a sentence in that link calling ranchers terrorist. Not even an implication. The link specifically makes note that Bundy stands alone as a defiant rancher in the area. It mentions that all the other ranchers in the area have cooperated and worked with the BLM. The link points the finger at the Bundy supporters and in no way claims or indicates that those supporters are fellow ranchers.
You have guzzled the FOX NEWS Koolaid.

LOL Please! You just over look the title.. how hilarious!


Cliven Bundy: right-wing extremist domestic terrorist lawbreaker

Did you need to put on glasses? Or are you going to keep trying to wiggle out of that blazing title calling Bundy a Terrorist?

I read the entire article. It calls one rancher, Bundy, a terrorist. The thread implies "ranchers" are being called terrorist. Pay attention, this is the point I am attempting to make, neither Reid nor the media are calling ranchers terrorist. They are calling the armed persons who came to a protest and demonstration armed. Or, those who came with weapons to interfere with government agents performing a task ordered and approved by a court or government agency. That can not be defended. Those people are clearly law breakers and terrorist. They have to hide behind the "rancher" label. They can not stand on their own. Their supporters can not defend them if they are represented on their own. Without the "rancher" label they are just trouble makers using a cause of ranchers as an excuse to promote their own cause.
So, where is the link that shows a news source calling ranchers, plural, terrorist?

 

[CaféAuLait]

There is not a sentence in that link calling ranchers terrorist. Not even an implication. The link specifically makes note that Bundy stands alone as a defiant rancher in the area. It mentions that all the other ranchers in the area have cooperated and worked with the BLM. The link points the finger at the Bundy supporters and in no way claims or indicates that those supporters are fellow ranchers.
You have guzzled the FOX NEWS Koolaid.

LOL Please! You just over look the title.. how hilarious!


Cliven Bundy: right-wing extremist domestic terrorist lawbreaker

Did you need to put on glasses? Or are you going to keep trying to wiggle out of that blazing title calling Bundy a Terrorist?

I read the entire article. It calls one rancher, Bundy, a terrorist. The thread implies "ranchers" are being called terrorist. Pay attention, this is the point I am attempting to make, neither Reid nor the media are calling ranchers terrorist. They are calling the armed persons who came to a protest and demonstration armed. Or, those who came with weapons to interfere with government agents performing a task ordered and approved by a court or government agency. That can not be defended. Those people are clearly law breakers and terrorist. They have to hide behind the "rancher" label. They can not stand on their own. Their supporters can not defend them if they are represented on their own. Without the "rancher" label they are just trouble makers using a cause of ranchers as an excuse to promote their own cause.
So, where is the link that shows a news source calling ranchers, plural, terrorist?

As I said earlier intellectual dishonesty at its best.

Bundy and his son (Ranchers) run that ranch.

 

[Stephanie]

Who is calling ranchers terrorist other than FOX and the RW media implying or reporting that the LW is calling ranchers terrorist? Sen. Harry said some of the folks supporting Bundy were domestic terrorist. He didn't call ranchers terrorist. So as near as I can tell, nobody is calling ranchers terrorist or linking ranchers with terrorism, except for FOX news and the RW media. If I am mistaken, I would appreciate a link. Thanks in advance.

Cliven Bundy: right-wing extremist domestic terrorist lawbreaker

Cliven Bundy: right-wing extremist domestic terrorist lawbreaker

couldn't they fit a couple more words in that title like, American CITIZEN

good grief, this is the type of crap you get off these left wing hate sites

 

[bucs90]

The OWS people just wanted a government handout or freebie.

They should've started a ranch...and used federal land without paying for it!

 

[rdean]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

I only know one rancher like that. He's a welfare queen. Getting for free what every other rancher in the country pays for.

 

[Againsheila]

let me hazard a guess.....OWS are dependent deadbeats who need the government while ranchers are independent people who work for a living and don't want government interference in their lives...

Both were fighting for just causes.

'income equality' is a just cause....? that's really just more socialism nonsense...

a few had good points.....like the corruption between government and business...

Study concludes: The US is an oligarchy, not a democracy - UPI.com

 

[Luddly Neddite]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

Why do ranchers get welfare payments from the taxpayers when other self employed Americans do not?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Why are ranchers considered terrorists but not OWS?

The side that was armed to the teeth like a bunch of Brazilian gangsters?

The next time that the women get in front of the cowboy banditti, they will be charged with obstruction and the gunmen with attempted murder of the women.

 

[Stephanie]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

Why do ranchers get welfare payments from the taxpayers when other self employed Americans do not?

call your damn Dear Leader and your Democrat party and ASK THEM WHY?

 

[Vandalshandle]

I am a whole lot more terrified of militiamen aiming rifles at American government employees in the desert than I am of a bunch of camel jockeys threatening to build rafts to cross the Atlantic from Afghanistan to launch soviet built rockets at Savannah, Georgia.

 

[Againsheila]

The OWS people just wanted a government handout or freebie.

They should've started a ranch...and used federal land without paying for it!

No, they want a living wage and jobs and an America with a strong middle class instead of the disastrous increasing income gap we have now..

 

[jasonnfree]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

Where else would they protest? In free speech zones out in the desert? As far as I know, OWS people didn't show up armed like these wannabees did in Nevada.

But their effect/AFFECT was far greater now wasn't it?

OWS impeded the liberty of others...didn't they? WHAT right did they have to do that? Hmm?

Grasping for straws you are. How did OWS impede the liberty of others? Make the banks uncomfortable?

 

[CaféAuLait]

The OWS people just wanted a government handout or freebie.

They should've started a ranch...and used federal land without paying for it!

They did use federal and public lands without paying for it, in fact the taxpayer has had to PAY THEM.


Occupy Wall Street Lawsuits: NYC Agrees To Pay Protesters For Destroying Library, Property

Bundy claims the Feds killed two cows, and damaged other items, should the feds pay him for being on public land "illegally". Ill bet the answer in no.


Another case of 'do as I say, and not as I do' BS.

 

[impalero]

OWS had no spokesperson or leader and the messages they were trying to convey varied from many. I supported them in ending the incestuous relationship that exists between Wall Street and DC. Let us also not forget that Obama the puppet was bankrolled into DC by some of the Big Wall Street Banks as well.

I also support the rancher and his fight against the elite that wanted to take his land away from him.

 

[guno]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

Terrorized people? there is no question you are a complete moron devoid of any facts


Transparency activist Ryan Shapiro discusses a growing controversy over the FBI's monitoring of Occupy Houston in 2011. The case centers on what the FBI knew about an alleged assassination plot against Occupy leaders and why it failed to share this information. The plot was first revealed in a heavily redacted document obtained by the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund through a FOIA request. The document mentioned an individual "planned to engage in sniper attacks against protesters in Houston, Texas." When Shapiro asked for more details, the FBI said it found 17 pages of pertinent records and gave him five of them, with some information redacted. Shapiro sued, alleging the FBI had improperly invoked FOIA exemptions. Last week, Federal District Judge Rosemary Collyer agreed with Shapiro, ruling the FBI had to explain why it withheld the records.
Why Did FBI Monitor Occupy Houston, and Then Hide Sniper Plot Against Protest Leaders?

 

[jasonnfree]

OWS had guns aimed at the police?

Must have missed that

Neither did Bundy or his family members. When people were raped and or died at Occupy, what was the response?

"These protests have a history of welcoming everyone and just assuming they're on your side," said David Meyer, a professor of sociology at the University of California at Irvine, who studies protest movements.

Sexual Assaults in Occupy Wall Street Camps - ABC News


And then of course there were pedophiles too. But none of that bad behavior was the fault of Occupy. GMAB.

With a movement like OWS there's not a lot of control who will join in. In any large movement including the vietnam war protests and during the world trade riots, the establishment (the banks, police) can hire thugs to act as protesters.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Why don't we get the opinion of a real terrorist and see how that compares to the current mood, sentiment, and opinions of the Right in this matter?

"For all intents and purposes, federal agents had become "soldiers" (using military training, tactics, techniques, equipment, language, dress, organization, and mindset) and they were escalating their behavior."

Sound familiar? Well, that was followed by this:

"Therefore, this bombing was also meant as a pre-emptive (or pro-active) strike against these forces and their command and control centers within the federal building."

- Timothy McVeigh, April 27th, 2001

McVeigh Letter

 

[impalero]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

Where else would they protest? In free speech zones out in the desert? As far as I know, OWS people didn't show up armed like these wannabees did in Nevada.

I am amazed that people don't come together against these "Free Speech Zones" that have been popping up in what is supposed to be a Constitutionally Protected Right.

So it is limited speech for the peons and unlimited speech if you are a politician, crony corporation or crony bank?

 

[guno]

The answer is simple. Ranchers work. They put food on the tables of others. Their horses work. Their dog's work. The cats work. The only thing ranchers want is to be left alone. OWS wants free condoms.

More idiotic talking points from you ! What a surprise!!

Does this moronic crap just come into your little brain or do you have you work on it?