Why are ranchers considered terrorists but not OWS?

[Againsheila]

The answer is simple. Ranchers work. They put food on the tables of others. Their horses work. Their dog's work. The cats work. The only thing ranchers want is to be left alone. OWS wants free condoms.

More idiotic talking points from you ! What a surprise!!

Does this moronic crap just come into your little brain or do you have you work on it?

Why don't you people understand? It's not the democrats against the republicans. It's not the left versus the right or the conservatives versus the liberals. It's the American People against the Government and the Government against the American People. Until you realize that and stop your petty squabbles, nothing will change, America will continue it's down slope and the people will continue to lose. We need to once again have a government "of the people by the people and for the people" instead "of the rich, for the rich and by the rich"

 

[Stephanie]

I am a whole lot more terrified of militiamen aiming rifles at American government employees in the desert than I am of a bunch of camel jockeys threatening to build rafts to cross the Atlantic from Afghanistan to launch soviet built rockets at Savannah, Georgia.

really, how many people died with the militiamen and the government at this ranch?

you people and your dramatics and hate for you fellow countrymen and women, even though not one person was, KILLED OR SHOTS fired at this ranch...You're more afraid of them then (as call them, camel jockeys) who highjacks planes and rams them into building..

man oh man,

 

[guno]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

Terrorized people? there is no question you are a complete moron devoid of any facts


Transparency activist Ryan Shapiro discusses a growing controversy over the FBI's monitoring of Occupy Houston in 2011. The case centers on what the FBI knew about an alleged assassination plot against Occupy leaders and why it failed to share this information. The plot was first revealed in a heavily redacted document obtained by the Partnership for Civil Justice Fund through a FOIA request. The document mentioned an individual "planned to engage in sniper attacks against protesters in Houston, Texas." When Shapiro asked for more details, the FBI said it found 17 pages of pertinent records and gave him five of them, with some information redacted. Shapiro sued, alleging the FBI had improperly invoked FOIA exemptions. Last week, Federal District Judge Rosemary Collyer agreed with Shapiro, ruling the FBI had to explain why it withheld the records.
Why Did FBI Monitor Occupy Houston, and Then Hide Sniper Plot Against Protest Leaders?

Assassination, geeeee who might want to do that, It couldn't be some slack jawed pasty face beer belly low IQ bagger gun clutcher with two first names now could it ?

 

[Sallow]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

OWS didn't show up with Military Assault Rifles.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I am a whole lot more terrified of militiamen aiming rifles at American government employees in the desert than I am of a bunch of camel jockeys threatening to build rafts to cross the Atlantic from Afghanistan to launch soviet built rockets at Savannah, Georgia.

really, how many people died with the militiamen and the government at this ranch?

you people and your dramatics and hate for you fellow countrymen and women, even though not one person was, KILLED OR SHOTS fired at this ranch...You're more afraid of them then (as call them, camel jockeys) who highjacks planes and rams them into building..

man oh man,

Smash it down now before people are killed.

No militia with guns at protests, period.

 

[JakeStarkey]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

OWS didn't show up with Military Assault Rifles.

Grampa is staring to lose it: equating marijuana deaths with the end of civilization, militia terrorists as good guys, and so forth.

 

[Vandalshandle]

I am a whole lot more terrified of militiamen aiming rifles at American government employees in the desert than I am of a bunch of camel jockeys threatening to build rafts to cross the Atlantic from Afghanistan to launch soviet built rockets at Savannah, Georgia.

really, how many people died with the militiamen and the government at this ranch?

you people and your dramatics and hate for you fellow countrymen and women, even though not one person was, KILLED OR SHOTS fired at this ranch...You're more afraid of them then (as call them, camel jockeys) who highjacks planes and rams them into building..

man oh man,

Well of course, I am terrified that another Saudi Arabian is going to hijack a plane. That is why I make it a point never to go to Saudi Arabia on vacation.

 

[guno]

OWS had guns aimed at the police?

Must have missed that

Neither did Bundy or his family members. When people were raped and or died at Occupy, what was the response?

"These protests have a history of welcoming everyone and just assuming they're on your side," said David Meyer, a professor of sociology at the University of California at Irvine, who studies protest movements.

Sexual Assaults in Occupy Wall Street Camps - ABC News


And then of course there were pedophiles too. But none of that bad behavior was the fault of Occupy. GMAB.

With a movement like OWS there's not a lot of control who will join in. In any large movement including the vietnam war protests and during the world trade riots, the establishment (the banks, police) can hire thugs to act as protesters.

Yep a lot of Agent Provocateurs placed there by the police

 

[Kosh]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

Far left logic has never been about logic.

Ranchers standing up to a government that took family land = Bad.
American Indians standing up to a government that took their family land = good.

More proof that the far left should not be in charge of anything.

 

[CaféAuLait]

Why don't we get the opinion of a real terrorist and see how that compares to the current mood, sentiment, and opinions of the Right in this matter?

"For all intents and purposes, federal agents had become "soldiers" (using military training, tactics, techniques, equipment, language, dress, organization, and mindset) and they were escalating their behavior."

Sound familiar? Well, that was followed by this:

"Therefore, this bombing was also meant as a pre-emptive (or pro-active) strike against these forces and their command and control centers within the federal building."

- Timothy McVeigh, April 27th, 2001

McVeigh Letter

Sounds just like the left wing hero Bill Ayers (praised Sirhan Sirhan) who had a hell of a lot more supporters working with him. They bombed the Pentagon, the Capitol, numerous cop cars, police stations and blew up half a city block killing three.

They also PLANNED a mass murder at Fort Dix of soldiers and their family members but fortunately blew themselves up instead.

''The only reason they were not guilty of mass murder is mere incompetence,'' he said. ''I don't know what sort of defense that is.''~ Prof Harvey Klehr

Quieter Lives for 60's Militants, but Intensity of Beliefs Hasn't Faded - NYTimes.com

The House On West 11th Street - NYTimes.com

No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives - In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen - NYTimes.com

Greenwich Village townhouse explosion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[The T]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

Far left logic has never been about logic.

Ranchers standing up to a government that took family land = Bad.
American Indians standing up to a government that took their family land = good.

More proof that the far left should not be in charge of anything.

Never has been...pure EMOTION. Logic was and IS never a factor. EVER.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Why don't we get the opinion of a real terrorist and see how that compares to the current mood, sentiment, and opinions of the Right in this matter?

"For all intents and purposes, federal agents had become "soldiers" (using military training, tactics, techniques, equipment, language, dress, organization, and mindset) and they were escalating their behavior."

Sound familiar? Well, that was followed by this:

"Therefore, this bombing was also meant as a pre-emptive (or pro-active) strike against these forces and their command and control centers within the federal building."

- Timothy McVeigh, April 27th, 2001

McVeigh Letter

Sounds just like the left wing hero Bill Ayers (praised Sirhan Sirhan) who had a hell of a lot more supporters working with him. They bombed the Pentagon, the Capitol, numerous cop cars, police stations and blew up half a city block killing three.

They also PLANNED a mass murder at Fort Dix of soldiers and their family members but fortunately blew themselves up instead.

''The only reason they were not guilty of mass murder is mere incompetence,'' he said. ''I don't know what sort of defense that is.''~ Prof Harvey Klehr

Quieter Lives for 60's Militants, but Intensity of Beliefs Hasn't Faded - NYTimes.com

The House On West 11th Street - NYTimes.com

No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives - In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen - NYTimes.com

Greenwich Village townhouse explosion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well, I hereby vow never to vote for Bill Ayers.....

 

[Pete7469]

Why are ranchers considered terrorists but not OWS?

Anyone is a terrorist who threatens the use of violence against Federal officials lawfully carrying out their duties as instructed by a court – this would include ranchers, rightwing extremists, or a member of OWS.

Your ‘question’ is as idiotic as you are an ignorant partisan hack.

Asshole...

So only if you threaten violence against your beloved statist government can you be reviled as a terrorist.

If your a thug agency committing violence against ordinary people who have done nothing illegal you're absolved of any condemnation right?

Wait till a republicrat is in the WH again....

Then everything the government does will be tyranny and terrorism again.

You people disgust me beyond comprehension.

 

[Pete7469]

Why don't we get the opinion of a real terrorist and see how that compares to the current mood, sentiment, and opinions of the Right in this matter?

"For all intents and purposes, federal agents had become "soldiers" (using military training, tactics, techniques, equipment, language, dress, organization, and mindset) and they were escalating their behavior."

Sound familiar? Well, that was followed by this:

"Therefore, this bombing was also meant as a pre-emptive (or pro-active) strike against these forces and their command and control centers within the federal building."

- Timothy McVeigh, April 27th, 2001

McVeigh Letter

Sounds just like the left wing hero Bill Ayers (praised Sirhan Sirhan) who had a hell of a lot more supporters working with him. They bombed the Pentagon, the Capitol, numerous cop cars, police stations and blew up half a city block killing three.

They also PLANNED a mass murder at Fort Dix of soldiers and their family members but fortunately blew themselves up instead.

''The only reason they were not guilty of mass murder is mere incompetence,'' he said. ''I don't know what sort of defense that is.''~ Prof Harvey Klehr

Quieter Lives for 60's Militants, but Intensity of Beliefs Hasn't Faded - NYTimes.com

The House On West 11th Street - NYTimes.com

No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives - In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen - NYTimes.com

Greenwich Village townhouse explosion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well, I hereby vow never to vote for Bill Ayers.....

Why would you need to?

His acolyte is your moonbat messiah.

 

[Plasmaball]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

let me hazard a guess.....OWS are dependent deadbeats who need the government while ranchers are independent people who work for a living and don't want government interference in their lives...

Both were fighting for just causes.

no

 

[CaféAuLait]

Why don't we get the opinion of a real terrorist and see how that compares to the current mood, sentiment, and opinions of the Right in this matter?

"For all intents and purposes, federal agents had become "soldiers" (using military training, tactics, techniques, equipment, language, dress, organization, and mindset) and they were escalating their behavior."

Sound familiar? Well, that was followed by this:

"Therefore, this bombing was also meant as a pre-emptive (or pro-active) strike against these forces and their command and control centers within the federal building."

- Timothy McVeigh, April 27th, 2001

McVeigh Letter

Sounds just like the left wing hero Bill Ayers (praised Sirhan Sirhan) who had a hell of a lot more supporters working with him. They bombed the Pentagon, the Capitol, numerous cop cars, police stations and blew up half a city block killing three.

They also PLANNED a mass murder at Fort Dix of soldiers and their family members but fortunately blew themselves up instead.

''The only reason they were not guilty of mass murder is mere incompetence,'' he said. ''I don't know what sort of defense that is.''~ Prof Harvey Klehr

Quieter Lives for 60's Militants, but Intensity of Beliefs Hasn't Faded - NYTimes.com

The House On West 11th Street - NYTimes.com

No Regrets for a Love Of Explosives - In a Memoir of Sorts, a War Protester Talks of Life With the Weathermen - NYTimes.com

Greenwich Village townhouse explosion - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Well, I hereby vow never to vote for Bill Ayers.....

You don't have to vote for Bundy either.

Either way, the terrorists and murderers, like Ayers, his wife Bernadine Dohrn, and Kathy Boudin are respected left wing college professors PAID to teach our children. Heck, Obama has been in their home!

Obama once visited '60s radicals - Ben Smith - POLITICO.com

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/04/us/politics/04ayers.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

The home of a man who states ;

''I don't regret setting bombs,'' Bill Ayers said. ''I feel we didn't do enough.''


http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/11/b...moir-sorts-war-protester-talks-life-with.html


This guy Bundy, never drew a gun, never bombed, or killed anyone, or planned mass murder, he was protesting peacefully and many on the left think he is the biggest piece of shit there ever was, while defending what The Weathermen did.

 

[Plasmaball]

Because the left launches that accusation at anyone who isn't a liberal supporting their policies. Simple as that! Never mind the disgusting behavior of the OWS protesters, which was largely dismissed by the liberal media. They committed serious crimes including theft, rape, assault and even murder. But since the media felt that since their intentions were good, the bad stuff should be excused.

Veterans are also under constant attack. You'd think our veterans and all retired military were now the equivalent of al Qaeda operatives. Meanwhile, the real terrorists gain strength and continue to plot against us infidels while the administration looks the other way.

Things are so screwed up right now, in fact everything is backwards. Give money to the Muslim Brotherhood terrorists and take benefits from retired service members. Charge ranchers with the horrible crime of letting their cattle graze and allow illegals to come here and get benefits and stop deportations. While we're at it, let the illegals sign up for Obamacare, welfare and fight to allow them to practice law here so they can represent more illegals who want to invade. Bash Christians for not supporting gay marriage and abortion, but protect the Muslims who behead gays and treat women like possessions. That is all part of the fundamentally transformed America. How ya liking it so far?

The horrible crime with the rancher? He didnt pay his fucking fees and ignored and ignores federal laws. You stupid moron, seriously, how many times you need to be corrected before it gets through your moronic head?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

OWS had guns aimed at the police?

Must have missed that

Posession of a weapon is not an act of terrorism dumbass. Aiming it at someone may be a crime depending on the circumstances but not even close to the definition of terrorism. Especially since the fort hood shooting was considered "workplace violence"

Now sit back down and choke on some more Obama bullshit

 

[rdean]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

I only know one rancher like that. He's a welfare queen. Getting for free what every other rancher in the country pays for.

It's strange the way right wingers only seem to have the lowest values and morals of others. When you point out what Bush did, the right wingers say, "But Clinton". When you point out Republicans having strategy sessions charged to the GOP base at a faux bondage lesbian bar, they say, but Democrats did something else.

It's as if they have no morals or values beyond what they imagine others have. Their defense is always, "But they did it first" as if that absolves them of any wrong doing.

This is the first time I ever heard of a rancher refusing to pay the federal government grazing fees and they have turned him into a hero, along with Zimmerman, Koresh, and others of that ilk.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

OWS actually terrorized many of the areas they occupied. People were actually injured and property was damaged. But the ranchers are the terrorists?

Does not compute

I only know one rancher like that. He's a welfare queen. Getting for free what every other rancher in the country pays for.

It's strange the way right wingers only seem to have the lowest values and morals of others. When you point out what Bush did, the right wingers say, "But Clinton". When you point out Republicans having strategy sessions charged to the GOP base at a faux bondage lesbian bar, they say, but Democrats did something else.

It's as if they have no morals or values beyond what they imagine others have. Their defense is always, "But they did it first" as if that absolves them of any wrong doing.

This is the first time I ever heard of a rancher refusing to pay the federal government grazing fees and they have turned him into a hero, along with Zimmerman, Koresh, and others of that ilk.

You quote yourself like you're in 3rd person. What the hell is wrong with you? And you didn't even answer the op