Why Hillary Will Win (probably)

[rightwinger]

One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.

Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.

The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.

Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.

She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race

Hillary will lose. She is a known quantity with far too much baggage that will weigh her down. After 8 years of Obama, America wants a change as evidenced in the 2014 election and she isn't it.

Very true

But who are the Republicans offering that will bring about change? All Republicans offer is a return to the Bush policy of 2001-2008.....we saw how that turned out

You realize there's more candidates to come, right?

The clown car has plenty of room

Jeb is the only candidate who can compete with Hillary

 

[Edgetho]

Bill Clinton had a great Presidency

Booming economy and relative worldwide peace

If Hillary can deliver half the results, we will be well off

the rapist had a great Newt Gingrich.

Before Newt took over the House, the economy was in turmoil. All the rapist did was sign whatever Newt put in front of him.

 

[Kondor3]

I've said this before and I'll say it again...

Hillary and Bill Clinton are the most scandal-ridden and potentially corrupt man-and-wife tag-team to ever soil the American political landscape.

America deserves and can do much better than Hillary.

Unfortunately, it may not get anything better, given the airheads and sheeple willing to play follow-the-leader and all the bandwagon-jumpers-on.

Pity.

Bill Clinton had a great Presidency

Booming economy and relative worldwide peace

If Hillary can deliver half the results, we will be well off

Yes.

Indeed.

At the cost of great corruption.

Why not have a great Presidency and booming economy and relative worldwide peace WITHOUT the stink of corruption?

Why not have a great Presidency and booming economy and relative worldwide peace WITHOUT feeding the evil of Political Dynasty Families in a Republic?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.

Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.

The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.

Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.

She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race

Hillary will lose. She is a known quantity with far too much baggage that will weigh her down. After 8 years of Obama, America wants a change as evidenced in the 2014 election and she isn't it.

Very true

But who are the Republicans offering that will bring about change? All Republicans offer is a return to the Bush policy of 2001-2008.....we saw how that turned out

You realize there's more candidates to come, right?

The clown car has plenty of room

Jeb is the only candidate who can compete with Hillary

Jeb and Hillary are the two worst candidates of all.

 

[hortysir]

Both parties have become watered down versions in their fight for the middle

 

[rightwinger]

Bill Clinton had a great Presidency

Booming economy and relative worldwide peace

If Hillary can deliver half the results, we will be well off

the rapist had a great Newt Gingrich.

Before Newt took over the House, the economy was in turmoil. All the rapist did was sign whatever Newt put in front of him.

The economy was booming before Newt came in

Can we talk about Newts love life too?

 

[rightwinger]

One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.

Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.

The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.

Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.

She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race

Hillary will lose. She is a known quantity with far too much baggage that will weigh her down. After 8 years of Obama, America wants a change as evidenced in the 2014 election and she isn't it.

Very true

But who are the Republicans offering that will bring about change? All Republicans offer is a return to the Bush policy of 2001-2008.....we saw how that turned out

You realize there's more candidates to come, right?

The clown car has plenty of room

Jeb is the only candidate who can compete with Hillary

Jeb and Hillary are the two worst candidates of all.

Who is the best?

 

[Edgetho]

The economy was booming before Newt came in

That's a lie and you are a lying sack of shit.

 

[Siete]

Bill Clinton had a great Presidency

Booming economy and relative worldwide peace

If Hillary can deliver half the results, we will be well off

the rapist had a great Newt Gingrich.

Before Newt took over the House, the economy was in turmoil. All the rapist did was sign whatever Newt put in front of him.

The economy was booming before Newt came in

Can we talk about Newts love life too?

NO !
RW's get a free pass to cheat on their wife...

 

[Siete]

The economy was booming before Newt came in

That's a lie and you are a lying sack of shit.

you called it !



the economy SUCKED !!

 

[timslash]

Hillary is too old.
She's often lie.
Remember Benghazi and her e-mail scandal.
Zero record of accomplishment.
She was fired during the Watergate investigation.
Remember her words about Iraq and other conflicts.
So should i continue?

 

[hangover]

One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.

Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.

The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.

Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.

She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race

Were you asleep during the midterms?

If only 20% of the electorate votes like the mid-terms in 2016, the cons will win. Really think that will happen?

 

[hangover]

The cons will vote to turn the country to the far right. The libs will vote to keep the cons from doing it. The center will vote for the lesser of two evils.

 

[rightwinger]

The economy was booming before Newt came in

That's a lie and you are a lying sack of shit.

 

[hortysir]

The economy was booming before Newt came in

That's a lie and you are a lying sack of shit.

What percentage of Clinton's added jobs were government jobs?

 

[rightwinger]

The economy was booming before Newt came in

That's a lie and you are a lying sack of shit.

What percentage of Clinton's added jobs were government jobs?

Maybe 5% or less

Most were in the areas of telecommunications and software

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

No kidding..the election is over a year and a half away. But look at the battlefield.

Cruz & Paul have no chance of winning the election. Fact.
That Curz and Paul are in the primaries forces those to their left to move right. Fact.
Once the GOP nomination is settled, whomever wins will have to move back to the middle to attract independents. Fact.
It would be much easier to move back to the middle if they never had to leave it thus fostering consistency and confidence in supporters and voters. Fact.
Hillary will not have to move one iota to win the nomination. Fact.
If the hard right does not get their guy, they stay home as we saw in 2012. Fact.
The hard left will not stay home regardless of who wins the DNC nomination. Fact.

Can Hillary sabotage her campaign? Sure. Ask 47% Mitt about that or the boob who picked Palin for VP... But she won't make the same tactical mistakes she made in 08. For one thing, she can'. For a second thing, the fences have mended between the moderates and Clinton since she came on board for Obama as SoS.

These are not facts; these are your own very biased opinions. You're telling us what you want things to be like, not necessarily how they may be.

 

[Zoom-boing]

Hillary is too old.
She's often lie.
Remember Benghazi and her e-mail scandal.
Zero record of accomplishment.
She was fired during the Watergate investigation.
Remember her words about Iraq and other conflicts.
So should i continue?

Dems see these as positive qualities.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Why Hillary Will Win (probably)

ROFLMNAO!

How ADORABLE is THAT?

 

[Liminal]

If she does not permanently distance herself from her Wall Street buddies she have to win without my vote.

I think you're going to be disappointed.

There are plenty of Democrats who do not support Clinton. That's one reason Obama is President now.