Why Hillary Will Win (probably)

[deltex1]

One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.

Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.

The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.

Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.

She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race

C- Thanks for your opinion.

 

[Wildman]

Walker would worry me if he had a college degree. That will sink him.

..., how many presidents did NOT have college degrees ? and exactly what does a degree have to do with intelligence, i see it has not helped you one tiny bit.

 

[LeftofLeft]

If she does not permanently distance herself from her Wall Street buddies she have to win without my vote.

Obama, Clinton, Warren.....all have Wall Street buddies. Many Liberals on Wall Street. George Soros became a billionaire playing the ultimate zero sum game: Hedging. All of the Democrats "demonization" of the 1% and Wall Street is met with laughter in back rooms when campaign donation checks are being cut.

The ones who get left behind and demonized are the Main Street businesses; entrepreneurs, and Middle Class Americans who "had a good year" income wise. I am voting for the candidate D, R, or I that puts these people as a top priority.

 

[Siete]

Obama won't release his college records and RW take a red shit.

Walker doesn't have any college records and the RW chirp ...AWWWW, who needs em


LMAO

 

[Manonthestreet]

And that's only one of the many ongoing scandals

 

[Siete]

Walker would worry me if he had a college degree. That will sink him.

..., how many presidents did NOT have college degrees ? and exactly what does a degree have to do with intelligence, i see it has not helped you one tiny bit.

Walker doesn't have one. He did GO to college, He met a girl who liked cross-eyed guys and married her.

 

[rightwinger]

If Hillary runs against Jeb she will win around 320 EV and will have to fight it out in some of the swing states

If she runs against Walker she will win around 350 EV

Any other Republican and she will win 400+ EV

Shouldn't she win the nomination first, or should we just submit and crown her now?

Hillary will face token Democratic opposition

Jeb is the only Republican offering more than token opposition

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Walker would worry me if he had a college degree. That will sink him.

..., how many presidents did NOT have college degrees ? and exactly what does a degree have to do with intelligence, i see it has not helped you one tiny bit.

Walker doesn't have one. He did GO to college, He met a girl who liked cross-eyed guys and married her.

Yeah, and look at the mess the Ivy Leaguers have given us.... perhaps a drop-out would be a bit refreshing. I mean Obama was supposed to be the smartest guy like ever, and look at the mess he has made in 6 short years.

 

[bodecea]

One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.

Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.

The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.

Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.

She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race

Were you asleep during the midterms?

Tell us how THESE midterms were any more of a "mandate" than any of the other midterms that go against a current President's party.

 

[Statistikhengst]

Hillary will win because she gets to run against a Republican and Republicans can't win swing states

Yepp.

Demographics is destiny.

The elephants have still not learned this lesson.

 

[Kondor3]

American men like children... might run to Momma Hillary....

to have their nappies changed...idiot weaklings that they are!

Uhhhhhh... wow...

 

[Kondor3]

I've said this before and I'll say it again...

Hillary and Bill Clinton are the most scandal-ridden and potentially corrupt man-and-wife tag-team to ever soil the American political landscape.

America deserves and can do much better than Hillary.

Unfortunately, it may not get anything better, given the airheads and sheeple willing to play follow-the-leader and all the bandwagon-jumpers-on.

Pity.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I think it's a pity that in 2015, we're discussing Bush's and Clintons as viable choices... I mean, seriously?

 

[rightwinger]

I've said this before and I'll say it again...

Hillary and Bill Clinton are the most scandal-ridden and potentially corrupt man-and-wife tag-team to ever soil the American political landscape.

America deserves and can do much better than Hillary.

Unfortunately, it may not get anything better, given the airheads and sheeple willing to play follow-the-leader and all the bandwagon-jumpers-on.

Pity.

Bill Clinton had a great Presidency

Booming economy and relative worldwide peace

If Hillary can deliver half the results, we will be well off

 

[kwc57]

One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.

Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.

The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.

Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.

She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race

Hillary will lose. She is a known quantity with far too much baggage that will weigh her down. After 8 years of Obama, America wants a change as evidenced in the 2014 election and she isn't it.

 

[Mac1958]

I think it's a pity that in 2015, we're discussing Bush's and Clintons as viable choices... I mean, seriously?

Our REAL Best & Brightest know to stay the fuck out of politics.

.

 

[rightwinger]

One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.

Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.

The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.

Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.

She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race

Hillary will lose. She is a known quantity with far too much baggage that will weigh her down. After 8 years of Obama, America wants a change as evidenced in the 2014 election and she isn't it.

Very true

But who are the Republicans offering that will bring about change? All Republicans offer is a return to the Bush policy of 2001-2008.....we saw how that turned out

 

[hortysir]

If Hillary runs against Jeb she will win around 320 EV and will have to fight it out in some of the swing states

If she runs against Walker she will win around 350 EV

Any other Republican and she will win 400+ EV

Shouldn't she win the nomination first, or should we just submit and crown her now?

Hillary will face token Democratic opposition

Jeb is the only Republican offering more than token opposition

Jeb's too Common Core for real conservatives

 

[hortysir]

One smart thing the GOP did was limit the number of debates. On the surface, at least, this was smart because it gives the whackjob candidacies of Cruz and Paul less official forums to announce their positions. Contrary to the belief that the Parties pick the candidtes; they actually have very little authority over them let alone control what they say. The flip side is that the urge to make a "big splash" may be too great for either of them to understand. Those who are looking to put their marker down somewhere between the hard right and the moderate right are probably the most dangerous.

Every karem to or pander toward the hard right forces the eventual nominee to move in that direction. This will, of course, hamstring him in the general election when the enevitable move back to the center has to be made.

The reason Hillary will win is because no such force sits to her left which would force her to react in such an irrational manner. Also, if such a force were to materialize, there would still be no need for Clinton to make the move; the voters on the hard left will be there for her in November. If we learned anything from 2012 it is that the hard right will abandon a GOP candidate that is seen as not willing to carry their water and message.

Obama fatigue and the ocassional flub (if they are ocassional) and tactical mis-step of the Clinton campaign will play a role as well but there shouldn't be enough of them to swing the election.

She isn't a shoo-in for the Presidency; there is still a long way to go. But it would be hard to imagine a better set-up for Secretary Clinton than what has happened in the last few weeks with Cruz, Paul and Rubio entering the race

Hillary will lose. She is a known quantity with far too much baggage that will weigh her down. After 8 years of Obama, America wants a change as evidenced in the 2014 election and she isn't it.

Very true

But who are the Republicans offering that will bring about change? All Republicans offer is a return to the Bush policy of 2001-2008.....we saw how that turned out

You realize there's more candidates to come, right?

 

[rightwinger]

If Hillary runs against Jeb she will win around 320 EV and will have to fight it out in some of the swing states

If she runs against Walker she will win around 350 EV

Any other Republican and she will win 400+ EV

Shouldn't she win the nomination first, or should we just submit and crown her now?

Hillary will face token Democratic opposition

Jeb is the only Republican offering more than token opposition

Jeb's too Common Core for real conservatives

"Real Conservatives" never get to pick the eventual Republican candidate

They are too radical for "Real Republicans"