DukeU
Diamond Member
I guess that would depend on the court
The laws are not being enforced. We don't need new ones, we need people to do their jobs, enforce the laws and stop playing politics.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I guess that would depend on the court
That’s a different topicThe laws are not being enforced. We don't need new ones, we need people to do their jobs, enforce the laws and stop playing politics.
No, it's not.That’s a different topic
Your comment was that if dangerous people can’t buy guns then they will just steal them and the law preventing them from legally buying them is preventing nothing. But the fact they they would have to steal or buy on the black market are added obsticles which would lead to less dangerous people getting guns and misusing them. Of course not full proof but it would undeniably have an effect. The debate shouldn’t be whether those laws would be effective. Of course they would be. The debate should be whether the added regulations are worth the loss of freedoms that come with themNo, it's not.
When discussing guns and why the laws aren't working???
How is that a different topic?
If we don't discuss why the current laws aren't working, we're not being honest, and the effort is flawed from the beginning. You can't address the issue without addressing all of the issues and that involves current laws and the failure to enforce them.
How the FUCK do you know who I vote for?but you vote for the people that do,, I know you leftist want to distance yourself from the results of your vote but the facts are the facts,,
you can take your background checks and registrations and stick them up your ass because they only effect law abiding people and not a single criminal,,
hhaha now you are just making things up.Yet you're the one who asked the question. Seems like you don't know what it even is either.
Which is what I've been saying all alongThe laws are not being enforced. We don't need new ones, we need people to do their jobs, enforce the laws and stop playing politics.
hhaha now you are just making things up.
what’s the difference between a background check and a universial background check?
My comments also included enforcing the current laws. If laws aren't going to be enforced, why have them? And why make more only to be unenforced?Your comment was that if dangerous people can’t buy guns then they will just steal them and the law preventing them from legally buying them is preventing nothing.
I have no issues with enforcing the laws on the books.My comments also included enforcing the current laws. If laws aren't going to be enforced, why have them? And why make more only to be unenforced?
Murderers are being released from prison by people screaming for new laws.......Pitiful.
I have no issues with enforcing the laws on the books.
If you vote democrat, you're creating the issues.I have no issues with enforcing the laws on the books.
You’re saying if I voted for a dem then I’m automatically a supporter of all those things and none of the dozens of other factors that may have gone into my vote matter?If you vote for democrats you obviously do since it is democrat party prosecutors who are dropping gun charges against repeat felons and democrat judges giving no bail release to violent gun offenders
Same question as post #233If you vote democrat, you're creating the issues.
You’re saying if I voted for a dem then I’m automatically a supporter of all those things and none of the dozens of other factors that may have gone into my vote matter?
No need to try and spin you're way out.Same question as post #233
Perhaps in some cases. That would depend on the person I voted for. If I invited for a Republican and then he sexually assaulted a staffer am I a supporter of sexual assault? My vote did enable the assault to happen after allNo…by voting for democrats you are getting those judges and prosecutors elected
People who can't pass a background check know they can't. If they try to purchase a gun they know they are breaking the law. Why should the burden of checking be on anyone else? Do you idiots not understand the notion of personal responsibility?"freedom" for people who can't pass a background check to buy a gun?
Both groups have a diversity of agendas and candidates. Would have to look at an individual candidate to give you a real answerNo need to try and spin you're way out.
Who is for the release of violent criminals? Democrats or Republicans?